درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The Covid-19 disease taught us that virtual training and evaluation should be considered together with face-to-face education. Therefore, in this article an attempt has been made to examine the various tools and methods of virtual evaluation of students' learning during the outbreak of contagious diseases. In this research, qualitative research method and grounded theory method were used for data analysis. The research participants were selected by purposeful sampling among the professors of Payam Noor University, Razavi Khorasan province, and after selecting 18 people, saturation was reached. After collecting information by semi-structured interview method, the type and amount of tools were analyzed by entering Max QDA software. In the next step, using available sampling and an open-ended questionnaire, 6 experts in the field of virtual education were asked to state the advantages, disadvantages and solutions of each of the evaluation categories. The findings indicate that virtual evaluation includes 2 main categories; exam and non-exam and 11 subcategories; Formative exam, test , descriptive exam, unique exam, oral exam, self-evaluation, attendance and absence, class presentation, research, rewriting and assignment presentation. The sub-categories of "attendance" and "test " and "research" have the most, and the category of "self-evaluation" and "unique exam" have the least amount of use among professors. In general, the main category "non-exam" is used more than the main category "exam" in professors' evaluations.

English serves as a global bridge language, prompting continuous reforms in programs aimed at achieving proficiency. Among the most sought-after skills are listening and speaking, as people spend significant time engaged in these activities. Despite the correlation between listening and speaking, these skills are taught through distinct courses at the university in Burundi. Moreover, integrating these important language skills through teaching novels is not done there; novels are mostly exploited for their thematic and literary messages. Consequently, students often struggle with listening and speaking. This study aimed at measuring the proficiency level in listening and speaking among university students in Burundi as a result of their past exposure to novels. Besides, it experimented with the Integrative Approach to check if using it in novel teaching can reverse the situation at IPA and ENS in Burundi. Fifty-two students from Burundi Higher Institute of Education and 108 from the Institute of Applied Pedagogy, second year (2022-2023), were used. The sample size was fixed using Krejcie and Morgan’s formula[1]. Selecting students was done randomly. Both the group passed a pretest, then a posttest after a lecture on the novel, Weep Not, Refugee (2014), which also used the Integrative Approach. After marking the tests' sheets, the researcher analysed and compared scores using the SPSS 21. The pretest revealed poor performance across both groups, highlighting the inefficacy of existing methods in enhancing listening and speaking skills through novel. However, posttest scores showed excellent improvement in the experimental group while the control group continued performing poorly which answers the research question, “To what extent does the Integrative Approach improve university EFL students' scores in listening and speaking if it is used in novel teaching?” Therefore, adopting this study’s findings will enhance teaching novels at university in Burundi and sustain proficiency in listening and speaking for a lifelong experience. Keywords: English proficiency, foreign language, integrative method, listening skills, speaking skills [1] n=χ2Np(1-p)e2 N-1+χ2p(1-p) (Singh and Masuku, 2014;Bukhari, 2021)

Online learning is one of the educational channels that learners and educational centers have recently turned to. However, there are still concerns about its effectiveness. The aim of the study was to explain learners' perspectives on the effectiveness of online learning. The present study was a qualitative study using content analysis method that was conducted in 1402. The participants were 38 female (n=22) and male (n=16) language learners from Tehran Language School who had experience in online learning and were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected and analyzed through interviews. The overall analysis of the interviews indicates that 63% of learners (n=24) rated the method as weak, 20% (n=8) rated the method as average, and 17% (n=6) rated the method as good. 29 percent (n=11) believed that the method was effective in improving their knowledge, and 23 percent (n=9) considered the method effective in improving speaking skills. 15 percent (n=6) are willing to participate in online learning again and 83 percent (n=31) believed that the most important problem of online learning is the lack of necessary infrastructure and 83.6 percent (n=32) of the participants believe that the best learning method to improve English language skills is face-to-face learning. The findings indicate that online learning is not a suitable method for improving English language knowledge and skills compared to face-to-face education and if it is necessary to learn English online, it is necessary to provide infrastructure.