آرشیو

آرشیو شماره ها:
۶۸

چکیده

نمادپردازی شیوه بیانی رمزآمیز و موثر در انتقال معناست که در ادوار مختلف، مورد توجه نگارگران ایرانی بوده است. به ویژه عصر صفوی که در آن با رسمیت بخشیدن مذهب شیعی و گرایش دربار و کارگاه های هنری به مصورسازی مضامین عرفانی، کاربرد عناصر نمادین بیش از پیش مطرح گردید. از جمله این کارگاه ها، کارگاه شاهزاده ابراهیم میرزا در مشهد بود که هم به دلیل اهمیت مذهبی و فرهنگی خراسان و هم مصورسازی نسخ فاخری چون هفت اورنگ جامی در آن، مورد توجه بوده است. نگاره های هفت اورنگ ابراهیم میرزا برگرفته از داستان های جامی است مانند داستان یوسف وزلیخا، که در قرآن کریم و کتب دیگر ادیان آمده و یا داستان لیلی و مجنون که مکرر در ادبیات و فرهنگ ایران بازتاب یافته است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر این است که ضمن بررسی تطبیقی نمادپردازی در نگاره های این دو داستان، رابطه آن با مضامین مختلفی چون باورهای دینی و فرهنگی این دوره را مشخص کنیم و به این پرسش ها پاسخ دهیم: 1- فرهنگ و باورهای دینی عصر صفوی چگونه در نمادپردازی دو داستان بازتاب یافته است؟ 2- چه ارتباطی بین نمادپردازی در نگاره های داستان «یوسف و زلیخا» و «لیلی و مجنون» موجود در نسخه هفت اورنگ ابراهیم میرزا با فرهنگ و باورهای دینی ایرانیان در عصر صفوی وجود دارد؟ روش پژوهش تطبیقی- تحلیلی و شیوه گردآوری اطلاعات کتابخانه ای-اسنادی است. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که نگارگران هفت اورنگ از انواع نمادهای فرارونده دینی، فرهنگی و هنری در انتقال باورهای دینی و فرهنگی عصر خود سود جسته اند که کاربرد برخی چون نیلوفر و اسلیمی به تبع از سنت نگارگری دوره صفوی و برخی چون ققنوس و اژدها بر مبنای اساطیر و فرهنگ و نمادی چون کلاه قزلباش منطبق با باورهای مذهبی عصر صفویست. بعلاوه با وجود شباهت های بسیار در استفاده از نمادهای فرارونده هنری، نمادپردازی دو داستان متاثر از محتوای دینی و فرهنگی نگاره ها، متفاوت است.

Reflection of Religious and Cultural Beliefs of the Safavid Era in the Symbolism of the Paintings of Ibrahim Mirza’s Haft Awrang (with Emphasis on the Two Stories "Yusuf and Zuleykha" and "Leily and Majnoon")

Symbolism is a cryptic and effective way of conveying meaning, handled by Iranian painters in different periods. During the Safavid period, the use of symbolic elements became more prominent with the recognition of the Shiite religion and the tendency of art workshops to portray mystical and religious themes. Among these workshops was the royal workshop of Prince Ibrahim Mirza in Mashhad, which is recognized both for its religious and cultural significance of Khorasan and for its illustration of magnificent manuscripts such as the Jami’s Haft Awrang. Ibrahim Mirza's Haft Awrang paintings are based on Jami’s stories and have different themes, such as the story of "Yusuf and Zuleykha" mentioned in the Qur’an and other books of the monotheistic religions, or the often told story of "Leily and Majnoon". It is reflected in Iranian literature and culture. The aim of this study is to comparatively examine the symbolism in the paintings of these two stories, to determine their relationship with the religious and cultural beliefs of this period, and to answer the following questions: 1. How were the culture and religious beliefs of the Safavid period reflected in the symbolism of the two stories? 2. What is the connection between the symbolism in the paintings of the two stories and religious and cultural beliefs of the Iranians during the Safavid era? The research method is comparative-analytical, and the information collection method is library research. We start with symbols classifications: One of the types of symbols classification is the placement of symbols into the type of human symbols and transcendent symbols, based on the theory of symbolism by Charles Chadwick (1996). "Human symbols" is a personal aspect of symbolism that can be considered the art of expressing thoughts and feelings by referring to how they are expressed by the artist; like a jar in Khayyam's poems. In this sense, it is the artist who brings a symbolic concept to the symbol and uses it in a certain sense in his works, and this requires the examination of all the works of an artist that are outside the scope of this study. But, in "transcendent symbolism" symbols are broad, general and ideally objective images of the world, of which the present world is only an incomplete representation, mystical symbols, and cultural symbols may be considered of this type. Transcendent religious symbols refer to religious content, and transcendental cultural symbols refer to literature and culture, and transcendent artistic symbols are derived from the principles of Iranian painting and elements of nature. We examine artistic symbols in two sub-categories of geometric and natural in 6 paintings of Haft Awrang. What can be deduced from the analysis of the research findings and the comparison of the two categories of painting is that the painters of Ibrahim Mirza’s Haft Awrang paid attention to the belief and culture of their period in the painting of religious and cultural content. The use of symbols such as the Ghezelbash Hat of the main characters of the story, Islimi, Greh, lotus, green and blue colors, mountain -tree, and the golden sky is in accordance with religious and cultural beliefs and principles. In response to the second question from the painting tradition of this period, despite the similarities in the use of some transcendent artistic symbols in both categories of painting originating from the Iranian painting tradition and originating from the seven principles of painting during the Safavids period, symbolism is different in the pantings of two stories. It is clear that in the Iranian painting tradition, symbols, like other nations, have a cultural and doctrinal basis, which is immortalized to express deep and cryptic concepts in the literature and culture of the nations. Therefore, the formation of principles based on this deep connection between religion and culture in the Iranian painting tradition has led to the use of some similar transcendent artistic symbols. As the winged angel and phoenix are combined symbols, rooted in the ancient myths of ancient Iran, and after Islam, under the influence of the common concepts of religions, the winged angel became a symbol for Gabriel and angels close to God, and phoenix found a sacred and spiritual role. Therefore, the painters paid attention to the religious and cultural context of the story in symbolism, and used symbols accordingly in their paintings. Despite the influence of religion and culture on each other and the art of the Safavid period, it can be said that some mythological symbols such as phoenix and dragon from the rich culture of ancient Iran remained strong and alive. The painters also used symbols like Lutus, Greh, etc. and they became the common ground and basic principles of Iranian painting. Some symbols such as the winged angel and the phoenix, retained their mythological forms, but took on a religious color and were used in a new sense.

تبلیغات