درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Throughout his tory, the relationship between architecture and philosophy has been intricately intertwined. In the 1990s, architectural theory witnessed a significant influx of theoretical and critical debates influenced by French philosophy. This scholarly article delves into the intricate connection between architecture and philosophy, specifically focusing on transforming architectural discourse from theoretical and critical debates by French philosophy to an antitheoretical s tandpoint. Emphasizing the emergence of (neo-)pragmatism within architectural theory, it closely examines the pivotal role played by translating philosophical concepts, particularly those derived from the works of Deleuze and Guattari, in this paradigm shift. Employing a research methodology centered around thematic analysis, the s tudy explores the multifaceted relationship between architecture and philosophy, shedding light on Deleuze's philosophical framework as evident in the publications of the es teemed Anyone Corporation. The theoretical framework serves as a lens through which the difference, transformation, and change within the translation of Deleuze's ideas into architectural theory are meticulously examined. The findings conclude that architects selectively incorporate certain significant tenets from Deleuze's philosophy, such as smooth spaces, the fold, and the diagram. Furthermore, while the interaction between philosophy and architecture fos ters fruitful exchanges, it also gives rise to criticisms for ins trumentalizing philosophy and utilizing buzzwords without fully grasping their intended contexts. Ultimately, this article underscores architecture and philosophy's reciprocal dependence and interconnectedness as dis tinct yet interdependent disciplines, emphasizing the significance of transdisciplinarity and disciplinary cons titution.

While other major global players emphasize the tangible characteristics of power, this alliance focuses on intangible power structures. For this purpose, this union is the only powerful normative identity player in the world community. Analysis of the position of this union in this context and its role in the fight against terrorism is the primary goal of the present article. Now, the main question is, what effect does the European Union's identity positioning have on this union's role in the fight against terrorism in the world system? According to the findings of the research, the European Union, be-sides enjoying normative identity advantages, as an essential international actor seeks an independent role in the fight against terrorism, but the lack of growth of standard military and security power in line with the development of normative power faces this union with a challenge and continues to rely on NATO under the leadership of the United States. The surge of terrorist activities in the territorial sphere of the European Union, the perceptual and psychological environment of the strategic and security policy-makers of the European Union on how to deal with terrorism, the specific attitude of right-wing European statesmen towards trends of terrorism, and the lack of social integration of Middle Eastern Muslim immigrants in European norms have led to more alignment and coherence of the European Union's strategic and security policies against terrorist movements.