تبیین عوامل موثر بر پایستگی تحصیلی از طریق واسطه گری شکفتگی تحصیلی در دانش آموزان دختر پایه دوازدهم شهر شیراز (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین معنای تحصیلی ، انعطاف پذیری خانواده ، حمایت تحصیلی و ادراک از محیط کلاس با پایستگی تحصیلی با نقش میانجی شکفتگی تحصیلی در دانش آموزان دختر پایه دوازدهم شهرستان شیراز انجام شده است . روش تحقیق توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است . جامعه آماری شامل کلیه دانش آموزان دختر به تعداد 8681 نفر بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی خوشه ای مرحله ای 400 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند . برای گردآوری داده های پژوهش از شش پرسشنامه استاندارد معنای تحصیلی هندرسون–کینگ و اسمیت (2006) ؛ انعطاف پذیری خانواده شاکری (1382) ؛ حمایت تحصیلی ساندز و پلانکت (2005) ؛ ادراک از محیط کلاس داندی (2001) ؛ پایستگی تحصیلی مارتین و مارش ( 2008) و شکفتگی تحصیلی دینر و همکاران ( 2010) استفاده شد . روایی پرسشنامه ها با استفاده از روایی محتوایی و صوری، و پایایی آن نیز از طریق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه و به ترتیب 86/0، 84/0، 83/0، 85/0 و 82/0 آورد شد. نتایج نشان داد که انعطاف پذیری خانواده ، حمایت تحصیلی و ادراک از محیط کلاس بر پایستگی تحصیلی اثر معنادار و مثبت دارند و شکفتگی تحصیلی در مدل نقش میانجی دارد . به طور کلی ، نتایج بیانگر آن است که انعطاف پذیری خانواده ، حمایت تحصیلی و ادراک از محیط کلاس به صورت مستقیم و با واسطه گری شکفتگی تحصیلی می توانند به افزایش پایستگی تحصیلی دانش آموزان دختر پایه دوازدهم شهر شیرازکمک کنند . تلویحات آموزشی و کاربردی مورد بحث قرار گرفته استFactors affecting academic buoyancy mediated by academic flourishing in female 12th graders in Shiraz, Iran
This study examined the relationship between academic meaning, family flexibility, academic support, perceived class environment, and academic buoyancy, mediated by academic flourishing in female 12 th graders in Shiraz. This was a correlational descriptive research. The statistical population comprised 8681 female students, of whom a sample of 400 was selected via multistage cluster random sampling. Six standard questionnaires were administered: the Meaning of Education Questionnaire (Henderson–King & Smith, 2006), Flexibility of the Family Questionnaire (Shakeri, 2003), the Significant Other Academic Support Scale (Sands & Plunkett, 2005), Understanding the Classroom Environment Questionnaire (Dundee, 2001), the Academic Buoyancy Questionnaire (Martin & Marsh, 2006), and Academic Flourishing Questionnaire (Diener & Biswas-Diener, 2010). Family flexibility, academic support, and perceived classroom environment significantly and positively affected academic buoyancy, mediated by academic flourishing. Introduction Academic buoyancy of all students, especially female high-school students, is a major concern of school managers and authorities (Golestaneh & Behzad, 2019; Farid & Ashrafzadeh, 2021; Azimi, Shahani Yeylagh, & Omidian, 2021). About 20%-40% of students have academic non-buoyancy, and about 5%-10% report severe academic non-buoyancy (Najafipour & Khankashi, 2021). Factors affecting students’ academic buoyancy are categorized into three levels of psychological, school- and educational participation-related, and family- and peer-related factors (Farid & Ashrafzadeh, 2021). Academic flourishing is an antecedent of psychological factors affecting academic buoyancy (Abdi & Zandi Payam, 2020). Diener, Wirtz, Tov, Kim-Prieto, Choi, Oishi, and Biswas-Diener (2010) proposed flourishing as a multi-dimensional construct of psychological flourishing encompassing competency, optimism, having goals in life, positive interpersonal relations, and self-esteem. Academic meaning is another antecedent of factors related to school and educational participation (Soltani Banavandi & Khezri Moghaddam, 2017). Meaning refers to the internal implication of education. Career preparation, independence, finding a direction for the future, learning, social connections, the world, self-development, taking the next step, stress, and escape are the components of academic education (Jafari & Hejazi, 2020). The antecedents related to family- and peer-related factors include academic buoyancy and family flexibility (Soltani Banavandi & Khezri Moghaddam, 2020). Family flexibility refers to the degree of changes to the family’s roles, rules, control, and discipline. Research supports a potential correlation between academic meaning, family flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment, academic flourishing, and academic buoyancy. Still, the experimental evidence is limited to Western samples, the generalizability of the results to Iranian female high-school students remains to be seen. Moreover, most Iranian studies on this subject have been conducted on university students and students of medical sciences. The effect of academic meaning, family flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment, and academic flourishing on academic buoyancy of female 12 th graders remains unknown in Iran and elsewhere. So far, no experimental study in Iran or worldwide has investigated the role of academic flourishing as a possible mediator of the relationship between academic meaning, family flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment, academic flourishing, and academic buoyancy in female 12 th graders. The current study was conducted to bridge these research gaps. Methodology This was an applied descriptive correlational study using structural equation modeling (SEM). The statistical population comprised all (n = 8681) the female 12 th graders in Shiraz (Iran) in 2020-2021. A sample of 400 was selected via multistage cluster random sampling. The Department of Education of Shiraz issued the required permits. The statistics on all female 12 th graders in Shiraz was obtained, and the city was divided into four districts (with 12, 17, 13 and 10 schools in Districts 1 to 4, respectively). Two districts were randomly selected, and nine all-girls high schools were chosen randomly from each district. Of each school, two 12th-grade classes were selected, and the students responded to the questionnaires. A total of 400 questionnaires were initially distributed, of which 50 incomplete ones were excluded. Finally, 350 complete questionnaires (corresponding to the sample size) were analyzed. Questionnaires The four-item Academic Buoyancy Questionnaire (Martin & Marsh, 2008) is scored on a five-point Likert scale from totally agree (5) to totally disagree (1) and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85. The Meaning of Education Questionnaire (Henderson-King & Smith, 2006) has 86 items with the following 10 components: career preparation (11 items), independence (5), finding a direction for the future (3), learning (10), self-development (11), taking the next step (3), making social connections (12), changing the world (8), stress (12), and escape (11). The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. The 16-item Flexibility of the Family Questionnaire was developed by Shakeri (2003) based on Olson’s (1999) circumplex model of the family. Children respond to this questionnaire to show the family’s flexibility. The items are scored on a five-point Likert scale from totally agree to totally disagree, and the scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86. The 24-item Academic Support Questionnaire (Sands & Plunkett, 2005) is scored on a four-point Likert scale from totally disagree to totally agree (1 to 4, respectively). It comprises four subscales of academic support from peers, mothers, fathers, and teachers, each evaluated with six questions. The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84. Dundee (2001) developed the 49-item Understanding the Classroom Environment Questionnaire to assess different dimensions of educational quality (students’ perception of learning, the professor, their own scientific ability, the educational atmosphere, and social conditions) on a five-point Likert scale from very low (1) to very high (5). The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. The eight-item Academic Flourishing Questionnaire (Diener et al., 2010) is scored on a seven-point Likert scale from totally disagree (1) to totally agree (7). The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82. Results The correlation coefficients between all the variables were significant (p < 0.05), suggesting the appropriate selection of variables based on the literature (Table 2). This correlation analysis provides insights into the relationships between the studied variables. SEM was applied to simultaneously test the hypothesized relationships. All the direct paths in the final model were significant (Table 5). Therefore, a significant and positive correlation existed between academic meaning, flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment, and academic flourishing on the one hand, and academic buoyancy on the other. A bootstrap test was run to determine the significance of indirect relationships between the variables and investigate the mediating role of academic buoyancy (Table 6). The overall effect from the exogenous variable to the endogenous variable without the mediator was first determined, showing a significant relationship between academic meaning, flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment on the one hand, and academic buoyancy on the other, without academic flourishing. The mediator test (Table 6) revealed that, despite the significance of the indirect relationships, the direct relationships between academic meaning, flexibility, academic support, perceived classroom environment one the one hand, and academic buoyancy on the other, was still significant, without academic flourishing; therefore, academic flourishing was a slight mediator of these relationships. Discussion and Conclusion The first finding was the direct effect of family flexibility on female 12-grade Shirazi students’ academic buoyancy. This relationship was significant and positive in the present study. The second salient finding was the significant relationship between perceived classroom environment and academic buoyancy mediated by academic flourishing in these students. This finding is important because it expands the current knowledge about the meditating role of academic flourishing in the relationship between perceived classroom environment and academic buoyancy by proving credible evidence. The third finding was the direct effect of academic support on academic buoyancy of female 12 th graders in Shiraz. This relationship was significant and positive in the current study. The fourth finding was the direct effect of academic flourishing on academic buoyancy of female 12 th graders in Shiraz. This relationship was also significant and positive. A major finding was the mediating role of academic flourishing in the proposed conceptual model. As the conceptual model was confirmed, the following practical recommendations can be made: 1) Based on the significant and positive effect of academic support on academic buoyancy, authorities in teacher training sessions should recommend that teachers increase their support of students to promote their academic buoyancy. 2) Based on the significant and positive effect of the perceived classroom environment on academic buoyancy, school managers should create an open and intimate atmosphere for teachers and students in class without undue strictness. 3) Based on the significant and positive effect of family flexibility on academic buoyancy, parents must be informed of free communication management styles, and democratic leadership in the family, and respect their children's independence. Despite these significant findings, the results should be generalized with caution due to the following limitations: The statistical population was limited to female 12 th graders; SEM cannot confirm cause-effect relationships; and the accuracy of the participants’ responses could not be guaranteed due to the self-report nature of the instruments. Future studies should examine class management as a school- and educational participation-related factor, as well as parenting style as a family- and peer-related factor affecting academic buoyancy. By testing the hypotheses put forward in relevant theories, the share of each factor can be identified, and the outcomes of academic flourishing for the academic buoyancy of students and other groups can be examined from different angles. To test similar models and generalize the findings, different samples with different age groups and academic levels should be recruited.
تبلیغات
