درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

به دنبال تحقیقات سویلز (1981) در بررسی نوع ساختاری، پژوهش های متعددی در بخش های مختلف مقالات علمی در زبان ها و حوزه های مختلف صورت گرفته، ولی توجه اندکی به چکیده ی مقالات حوزه ی ادبیات به زبان فارسی شده است. همچنین ادعای لورس (2004)در مورد تناظر دو نوع چکیده با مدل های متفاوت، و مارتین (2003) در مورد تاثیر عوامل اجتماعی-فرهنگی بر سبک نوشتار نیاز به بررسی داشت. به همین منظور، 90 چکیده ی مقالات انگلیسی و فارسی در زمینه ی ادبیات، نوشته شده توسط نویسندگان انگلیسی و فارسی زبان، بر اساس مدل های IMRD و CARS بررسی شد. نتایج این بررسی نشان داد که نخست، نویسندگان مقالات حوزه ی ادبیات عموما بر«مقدمه» و «نتایج» تاکید می کنند، «روش» و«بحث» را نادیده می گیرند، و خلاء موجود در پژوهش های قبل را ذکر نمی کنند؛ دوم، با وجود ناکارآمدی هر دو مدل، چکیده ی مقالات ادبیات عموما با مدل CARS بیشتر از IMRD سازگاری دارند. و سوم، چکیده های انگلیسی نوشته شده توسط نویسندگان فارسی با هنجارهای مقالات فارسی و بین المللی تفاوت دارند و دارای هنجار خاص خود می باشند. این پژوهش همچنین به بحث درباره ی موارد ناکارآمدی دو مدل در توصیف چکیده ها می پردازد و نهایتا راهکارهایی در زمینه ی آموزش زبان انگلیسی، خصوصا مهارت نگارش، ارائه می دهد.

خلاصه سازی متن در کلاس های رشته های مهندسی و تخصصی دانشگاه ها و موسسات صاحب نام و همچین در آزمون های بزرگ استخدامی و دولتی به خصوص در آی. ان. پی-اچ. بی یاموسوکرو جایگاه مهم و خاصی دارد. اما متاسفانه فرایند خلاصه سازی متن برای دانشجویا اغلب مشکل آفرین است. از میان مشکلات و نواقصی که وجود دارد، فرایند تفسیر عبارت برای دانشجویان و مدرسان دغدغه ای بسیار جدی و حقیقی است. موضوع اصلی پژوهش حاضر بررسی فرایندهای زبانشناختی است که قادرند متن را به سمت و سوی نوعی تفسیر عبارتی مطلوب رهنمون سازند. در پایان یک آزمون گرفته شده از دانشجویان، مشخص گردید که حداقل پنج متغیر از نمونه های ممکن تفسیر عبارت وجود دارد. این نتایج می تواند در جهت بهبود روش شناسی آموزش خلاصه سازی از متون به کار گرفته شود. اگرچه این موارد به هیچ روی نمی توانند کلیت روش های متفاوت بازگویی یک متن را که در عمل وجود دارد، در بر بگیرند.

In this research, different English translations of Sa‘di’s Bustan were studied. An anecdote was selected randomly with its three English translations to identify whether or not the translators have managed to convey the messages of the original poem. The three selected translations were examined according to two of the criteria that Larson (1984) has proposed (accuracy and naturalness) for testing a translation. By accuracy, the researcher intended to see whether, the translators have been successful in rendering the SL text accurately and precisely without radical changes, omission and addition; and by naturalness, it was meant whether the translations sound natural or they contain strange and foreign words. The results of the study show that Edwards has been successful in understanding the main idea of the original poem and conveying it into prose. Clarke’s translation is word-for-word and being literal, the natural criterion has been breached in some instances. Wickens’s has attempted to transfer the exact meaning of the original to the target text. Among the three translations studied, that of Wickens is considered to be the most accurate one.

در این مقاله، اصل صرفه جویی در گفتار به عنوان یک قانون جهان شمول در زبان شناسی تجزیه و تحلیل می شود. صرفه جویی در مصرف انرژی به هنگام گفتار معمولاً در مواردی عینیت پیدا می کند که گوینده ناگزیر است دو واحد زبانی نامتقارن با هم را در گفتار خود به کار گیرد. موضوع اصلی بحث در این مقاله، پدیده زبانی تلفیق است که به وضوح در گروه زبان های هند و اروپایی و به ویژه در زبان های روسی و انگلیسی دیده می شود. نگارنده در این پژوهش مانند بسیاری از زبان شناسان بر این باور است که وجود دوگانگی نامتقارن در نشانه های زبانی، موجب پیشرفت و پویایی نظام زبان می شود. پدیده تلفیق به عنوان نتیجه و نمادی از کارکرد اصل صرفه جویی در گفتار، در ساختارهای نحوی همه زبان های دنیا یک اصل تأثیرگذار است. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده، گویندگان استفاده از پدیده زبانی، تلفیق واحدهای زبانی با یکدیگر را بهترین شیوه برای صرفه جویی در مصرف انرژی و زمان گفتار می دانند. این واحدهای زبانی ممکن است از نظر معنایی به طور همزمان با نهاد و گزاره در زنجیره گفتار مرتبط باشند و از نظر مورفولوژیکی نیز ساختمانی شبیه ترکیب و گروه واژه داشته باشند.

It is axiomatic that L2 teaching and learning is a process that requires dynamic involvement of L2 learners in the acquisition of knowledge and skills. L2 learners need to be assisted in setting individual learning goals. They should also be given the exposure to and guidance in effective language learning strategies (LLSs) in order to build a high level of confidence in the learning process. The study was an attempt to examine the relationship between LLSs and L2 learners’ self-esteem. To achieve such objectives, a questionnaire was administered to 120 Persian L2 learners. The results revealed that LLSs had a strong correlation with self-esteem. Besides, the same strong, positive correlation was also observed between the participants’ self-esteem and their L2 proficiency level. It was finally underestood that of the L2 independent variables of the study (i.e., self-esteem and L2 proficiency level), it was the L2 participants’ proficiency level that better accounted for their use of LLSs. Conducting studies like the present one may contribute effectively to the better teaching of an L2 to L2 learners.

Although story mapping strategy has been shown to be beneficial in many reading comprehension classes, the benefits of this technique have not been thoroughly investigated in L2 writing research. The small number of previous studies (e.g., Li, 2007; Brunner, 2010) have found the potential benefits of using story mapping strategy on students’ writing performance, but they did not focus on different aspects of students’ writing. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effect of story mapping strategy on writing performance of EFL learners in terms of writing components (i.e., organization, content, grammar, mechanics, and style). After administering a standard proficiency test (OPT), 30 out of a pile of 82 Iranian EFL learners all majoring English teaching were selected and assigned to two groups: one experimental group and one control group. Both experimental and control groups completed two thirty-minute composition writing tests, one as a pre-test and the other one as a post-test. The experimental group received four sessions of instruction on how to use story mapping strategy in writing personal narratives. The results of One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Scheffé test indicated that the experimental group, which used story mapping strategy, made more progress in their personal narrative writings. Also, the results revealed that L2 learners made more progress in all writing aspects. The study contributes to teaching pedagogy by encouraging teachers to use story mapping strategy in L2 writing classes

Textbooks play a pivotal role in language learning classrooms. The problem is, among a wide range of textbooks available, which one is more appropriate for a specific classroom and a group of learners. In order to evaluate ELT textbooks, theorists and writers have offered different kinds of evaluative frameworks based on a number of principles and criteria. This study evaluates one example of such a series of ELT textbooks, namely, “American English File” using Littlejohn’s (1998) evaluative framework to see what explicit features of the book are, and what pedagogic values it has. Littlejohn believes that we should evaluate a textbook based on its own pedagogic values and we should see what is in it not what the teacher and evaluators think must exist in it. Consequently his framework is claimed to be devoid of any impressionistic ideas and it is in-depth and objective rather than being subjective. Nine ELT experts and ten ELT teachers helped the researcher rate the evaluative checklists. The results of the study show that although a number of shortcomings and drawbacks were found in American English File, it stood up reasonably well to a detailed and in-depth analysis and that its pedagogic values and positive attributes far out-weighed its shortcomings. The internal consistency between ratings was computed via the statistical tool of Cronbach’s alpha that indicated a desirable inter-rater reliability

This study aimed to assess the quality of Persian translation of Orwell's (1949) Nineteen Eighty-Four by Balooch (2004) based on House's (1997) model of translation quality assessment. To do so, 23 pages (about 10 percent) of the source text were randomly selected. The profile of the source text register was produced and the genre was realized. The source text profile was compared to the translation text profile. The result of this comparison was dimensional mismatches and overt errors. The dimensional mismatches were categorized based on different dimensions of register including field, tenor, and mode. The overt errors which were based on denotative mismatches and target system errors were categorized into omissions, additions, substitutions, and breaches of the target language system. Then, the frequencies of occurrences of subcategories of overt errors along with their percentages were calculated. The overt errors and dimensional errors were analyzed carefully. The dimensional mismatches as well as a large number of major overt errors such as omissions and substitutions indicated that the translation was not in accordance with the House's view stating that literary works needed to be translated overtly. In other words, mismatches on different levels of register showed that the cultural filter was applied in translation and the second-level functional equivalence required for overt translation was not reached. As a result, the Persian translation of Nineteen Eighty-Four did not fulfill the criteria to be an overt translation. Instead, this translation tended to be a covert one.