این مقاله به بحث در مورد قواعد و راه کار هایی برای ترجمه اشعار آپولینر می پردازد که ابعاد زیادی از این راهکار ها بازتاب اعتقادات و باورهای شخص آپولینر می باشد. اما هدف اصلی این مقاله این است که به بحث درمورد تکلیف ترجمه پرداخته و آن را ورود متن اصلی به آینده اش در نظر بگیرد نه صرفاً عملی برای نگهداری یا بهتر کردن متن. این مقاله با ارجاع به افکار بونِفوی دنبال شده و تفاوت بین معنا و احساس را نیز دربر می گیرد. قسمت پایانی در ارتباط با نقشی است که در پروژه های ترجمه ای چندزبانه توسط عکاسی و به خصوص کلاژ های قطعه های عکاسی شده ایفا می شود.
در این مقاله کوشیده ایم تا در چهارچوب دستور وابستگی ضمن برشمردن نقش های گوناگون فعل «شدن» در فارسی، از اهمیت واژگان در توصیف های نحوی سخن بگوییم. نگارندگان در این مقاله همچنین کوشیده اند تا به دقت از این اصل صورت گرایانه پیروی کنند که وجود نقش های دستوری هر زبانی را تنها با استناد به معیارهای صوری می توان پذیرفت و استعانت از معیارهای صرفاً معنایی برای تفکیک نقش های دستوری از هم، قابل قبول نیست. فعل «شدن» دارای یکی از شش نقش زیر در زبان فارسی است: فعل ربطی (در سه نوع جمله اسنادی کامل، اسنادی ناقص، و اسنادی با فاعل بندی)، جزءِ همکرد در برخی فعل های مرکب و فعل های پی بستی، فعل کمکی مجهول ساز، فعل وجهی، فعل کمکی در صورت مجهول یا ناگذرای افعال ضد سببی و در آخر فعل بسیط. در این مقاله، موارد فوق را یک به یک بررسی می کنیم.
نقش نشانه های نوایی در ابهام زدایی از عبارات مبهم فارسی در دو آزمایش تولیدی و شنیداری جداگانه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. دو نوع عبارت مبهم برای این منظور انتخاب شدند. نوع اول، زنجیره های آوایی سه هجایی بودند که بسته به محل حضور مرز واژگانی، به دو صورت یک واژه ای و دو واژه ای خوانده می شدند. نوع دوم گروه های اسمی دارای ابهام ساختاری شامل توالی یک اسم و دو صفت بودند که بسته به محل حضور مرز گروه نحوی میانی، به دو صورت خوانده می شدند. در آزمایش تولیدی تغییرات فرکانس پایه، دیرش و وقفه زمانی محدوده های زمانی مبهم در سطح عبارات هدف اندازه گیری شد. نتایج نشان داد الگوی تولیدی خوانش ها در سطح هر دو نوع عبارت از نظر هر سه نشانه نوایی فرکانس پایه، دیرش و وقفه به طور معنی داری با یکدیگر متفاوت است. در آزمایش شنیداری نقش نشانه های نوایی در تشخیص خوانش ها از یکدیگر به طور جداگانه از طریق بازسازی گفتار بررسی شد. نتایج نشان داد نقش تغییرات فرکانس پایه در ابهام زدایی، در سطح درک گفتار به طور معنی داری از نشانه های دیرشی بیشتر است.
This article reports on the findings of a study that investigated the impact of manipulating task performance conditions on listening task performance by learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). The study was designed to explore the effects of changing complexity dimensions on listening task performance and to achieve two aims: to see how listening comprehension task performance was affected and to investigate possible overlaps between EFL learners’ perceptions of task difficulty and hypothesized task complexity. A purposive sample of 54 first-year EFL learners randomly assigned to two parallel conversation classes in an English department of a major public university participated in the study and performed listening tasks in a language lab. The instruments used for data collection were seven tasks taken from a TOEFL Test Preparation Kit, each followed by listening comprehension questions and an item on the participants’ personal perception of the difficulty of the task. During counter-balanced administrations, the tasks were manipulated for one of the four dimensions of task difficulty (adequacy, immediacy, perspective, and prior knowledge). The resulting data included the participants’ perception of difficulty as well as their performance scores under less complex and more complex conditions. One-sample T-test and correlation analyses of the data revealed that for all of the four complexity dimensions, the hypothesized less complex task condition led to better learner performance. The correlation between learner-assigned difficulty score for the task at hand and theoretical task complexity level was significant only for the immediacy dimension (r=-0.67, p<.05). The results offer support for task complexity frameworks, raise doubts about learners’ perceptions of tasks, and imply possibilities for task manipulation in language learning contexts.
Although investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style on L2 learners’ metaphorical test performance. The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase was quantitative, and the second consisted of a series of case studies using “think-aloud protocol” and “retrospection.” In the statistical phase, aimed at shedding light on the effect of the cognitive style of field (in)dependence (FI/FD) on metaphorical test performance, 80 senior undergraduates majoring in English Translation were selected through a truncated test of TOEFL adopted from Barron (2004). Metaphorical test performance was analyzed through recognition, text-based true-false, and scripturally implicit questions, refined by conducting factor analysis. Moreover, the participants’ cognitive style of FI/FD was identified via GEFT. In the qualitative part, after analyzing the verbal reports of 8 informants, the participants’ strategy preferences were examined. Results revealed the impact of the cognitive style of FI/FD and working memory on the participants’ strategy preferences. Due to the advent of learner-centered approaches, this study has some implications for L2 pedagogy discussed in the paper.
During the last decades various researchers noticed that the traditional approaches to teaching had failed to teach learners to their utmost actual ability, therefore they put great efforts into developing post-modernist approaches and techniques such as critical thinking (CT) and cooperative learning (CL) for improving learning.The present study was an attempt to investigate the comparative effect of practicing CL and CT skills on EFL learners’ writing in a process-based approach to writing on EFL learners’ writing. Sixty Iranian female EFL learners at the intermediate level of English proficiency at Kish Language School were selected among a total number of 90 based on their performance on the Preliminary English Test (PET) and randomly assigned into two groups of CL and CT. Then the researchers administered an argumentative paragraph writing test to ensure the homogeneity of the two groups regarding argumentative writing before the treatment. Both groups were taught the same content through process-based approach throughout the 20-session treatment. Finally, the participants took a paragraph writing posttest including three writing prompts in argumentative genre. The mean scores of the two groups on the posttest were compared through an independent samples t-test. The results led to the rejection of the null hypothesis with the conclusion that CT instruction was significantly more effective than CL in improving EFL learners’ argumentative paragraph writing.
This study aimed to investigate the use of interactional metadiscourse markers in 168 comments made by 28 university students of engineering via an educational forum held as part of a general English course. The students wrote their comments on six topics, with a total of 19,671 words. Their comments during educational discussions were analyzed to determine their use of five metadiscourse categories (hedges, boosters, attitude markers, engagement markers, and self-mentions), making up interactional metadiscourse in Hyland’s (2004) model. Following descriptive analysis of the use of metadiscourse categories, chi-square tests were used to investigate the possible differences in the whole sample as well as gender-based differences. The findings showed that although female EFL learners used more metadiscourse markers than males did, the differences were minor and hence gender did not significantly influence the use of interactional metadiscourse markers. However, while male and female participants used all types of interactional metadiscourse, how they used them varied. They used engagement markers and self-mentions more frequently than boosters, hedges, and attitude markers. Since metadiscourse markers play crucial roles in mediating the relationship between what writers intend to argue and their discourse communities, the results of the present study have obvious importance in increasing students’ awareness of the way they organize their writings.
هدف این پژوهش، نخست بررسی ترجیح دانشجویان ایرانی در کاربرد خوش گوییات در زبان فارسی است و در مرتبه دوم، تاثیر عوامل زیستی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی و تحصیلی در به کارگیری خوش گوییات است. این پژوهش با استفاده از روش دلفی انجام گردید؛ برای این منظور جهت گردآوری اطلاعات، از دو نوع پرسشنامة باز و سازمان یافته استفاده شد. تعداد 130 نفر دانشجوی زن و مرد در دو مقطع تحصیلی کارشناسی و کارشناسی ارشد از میان رشته های تحصیلی علوم پایه و علوم انسانی با گویش های فارسی، ترکی، لری و کردی جهت پاسخگویی به پرسشنامه های تدوین شده، انتخاب شدند. سپس ترجیح شرکت کنندگان نسبت به واژه های خوش گویی (به گویانه) با در نظر گرفتن متغیرهای زیستی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی و تحصیلی نظیر جنسیت، زبان مادری، محل تولد و رشته تحصیلی آنان بررسی گردید. اطلاعات گردآوری شده از پرسشنامة دوم با استفاده از نرم افزار آماری SPSS تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج به دست آمده از ترجیح دانشجویان فارسی زبان در به کارگیری واژه های به گویانه در زبان فارسی حکایت می کند. همچنین نتایج آماری در مواردی، اختلافات معنی داری را بین جنسیت، گویش های مختلف، رشته های تحصیلی و محل تولد دانشجویان و ترجیح آن ها در کاربرد حسن تعبیر نشان داد.
In this article, the low back vowel // in word-final positions in Eghlidian dialect, one of Persian dialects, is studied. This vowel is represented phonetically as [], [] and [] in different phonetic environments. Therefore many words were collected via interviewing ten native speakers so that these different alternant forms can be accounted for appropriately. Since one of the authors of this article is a native speaker of the dialect, the verity of the data is confirmed. In writing this article, the collected data were classified in terms of different alternations of the vowel //, then related contexts were analyzed. Analysis of data showed that, firstly, in individual words, the final vowel // is pronounced as [o] when it is preceded by a non-glottal consonant; however, it is pronounced as [] when preceded by a glottal consonant and, secondly, in continuous speech, as a result of an assimilation, the final position vowel // is pronounced as [o] and [], respectively according to the graveness and acuteness of its preceding consonant.
مثل ها ، یکی از نمود های فرهنگ ملت هایند که به دلیل رواج آن ها در زبان روزمره ، مطالعه بین فرهنگی آن ها ضرورتی اجتناب ناپذیر است ؛ چرا که بدون آگاهی از فرهنگ و امثال زبان مقابل ، فهم آن زب ان دشوار می نماید . هدف مقاله حاضر معرفی پیشینه مثل های پارسی و مقایسه نماد ه ای آنها با مثل های آلمانی است . به این منظور مثل های پارسی به سه بخش مذهبی ، ادبی و مردمی تقسیم و در هر بخش بستر های مختلفی که خاستگاه این امثال اند، بررسی شده اند. سپس، مثال هایی همراه با برابرهای آلمانی آنها آورده و استعارات موجود در امثال هر دو زبان بررسی شده اند. از این مطالعه، این نتیجه حاصل آمد که در برابر مثل های پارسی، مثل های آلمانی با همان پیام وجود دارند. از سوی دیگر وجود استعاره های متفاوت در مثل های پارسی و آلمانی، نشانگر تأثیر فرهنگ بر ساخت و کاربرد استعاره ها است.
There is a general consensus that critical thinking can be influential in almost every occupation due to its association with the abilities such as problem solving and decision making. This paper aims at probing the role of critical thinking (CT) skills on EFL learners' reading comprehension performance using Bloom's taxonomy. Therefore, the role of CT strategies training across two language proficiency levels, high & low, was investigated. Then the difference between females and males regarding their CT was studied. In so doing, 240 male and female Iranian EFL students were selected and screened into two proficiency levels based on the Longman preparation course for TOEFL test. Each proficiency group was divided into critical and non-critical group. The results suggested CT skills significantly affected EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance. However, the effect of critical thinking strategy training didn’t vary across different language proficiency levels. Overall, the findings provide empirical support for the facilitative effect of critical thinking strategy training on reading comprehension performance of EFL learners.
This experimental study evaluated the possible effects of textual input- based enhancement on the acquisition of passive form on Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Sixty Iranian EFL learners at the pre-intermediate level of proficiency were randomly assigned into three groups; two experimental group and one comparison group. The first experimental group received passages in which the passive forms were repetitive, the second experimental group received passages in which the passive forms were underlined in different colors. The third group (comparison group) received explicit instruction of passive form with no passage. Repetition group received two texts in each session. The study followed a pre-test /treatment/ post-test design. The result indicated that both textually enhanced input, repetitive and underlined in different colors, have a statistically significant effect on the acquisition of target items than explicit instruction group. Moreover, it can be concluded that repetition can be more beneficial than underlined method of enhancement.
The aim of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate the impact of a metacognitive training program on university freshmen’s reading comprehension skill in a three-credit General English (GE) Course. The participants included eight groups of freshmen, in four disciplines: Management, Psychology, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Engineering. They were randomly assigned as four experimental and four control groups, each including approximately 30 participants. The same materials were taught to all groups after their initial homogeneity in English was assessed via Analysis of Variance of the pre-test scores obtained from a Key English Test (KET). In the experimental groups, one whole session was devoted to explicitly teaching three sets of metacognitive strategies and five reading strategies: skimming, scanning, previewing, using context clues, and making inferences. These groups also received metacognitive awareness-raising while applying the strategies in each reading lesson for six sessions. The analyses of the research data revealed that metacognitive strategy training promoted the participants’ learning when integrated with a reading-focused GE course regardless of their gender and a small effect from discipline. The findings have implications for teachers, materials developers, and teacher trainers.