درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to design a quantum leadership model in Iranian public universities Methodology: The research method was applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of data collection method. The statistical population of the research in the qualitative section included university experts who were selected as the sample size using the snowball sampling method and the principle of saturation of 10 people. In the quantitative section, the statistical population was the available scientific research articles on the subject, from which 32 articles were selected. In this study, library method, observation, in-depth interview and semi-in-depth interview were used to collect data. In a small part, content analysis was used. The interview with the experts indicated that the interview was valid, and in order to calculate the reliability, the reliability method was used between the two coders, and the results indicated that the interview was stable and valid. For the analysis of research data in the qualitative section, point analysis of content and Delphi method, and in the quantitative section, interpretive-structural modeling was used. Findings: The results of the study showed that the components of quantum leadership included quantum view, quantum thinking, quantum sense, quantum cognition, quantum operation, quantum trust and biocenology. On the other hand, the results showed that there is a significant difference between the existing leadership and the desired leadership. Conclusion: Attention to quantum thinking and Its point of view is necessary to achieve quantum leadership, therefore the four main factors can be explained in explaining why quantum leadership includes: uncertainty phenomena, environmental complexities, extensive and reciprocal interactions and continuous and rapid changes that Taken from the characteristics of the quantum paradigm, it is a phenomenon and necessitates the use of a certain style of leadership as quantum leadership in the organization.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate teachers' experiences of social status. Methodology: The present study was conducted using descriptive phenomenological method. The statistical population of the study included all the official teachers of education in the country in the academic year of 2018-19. The research sampling method was purposive and the data collection method was semi-structured interview. Accordingly, 14 teachers with at least 10 years of experience were interviewed. The selected teachers were from all over Iran and were not limited to a specific province. To analyze the data, the descriptive phenomenological method of Kliz, which has seven stages, was used. Findings: The findings of the study indicated that teachers' lived experiences of social status fall into three general dimensions: definition of social status, deterrence of social status and promotion of social status. The definition of social status from the teachers' point of view includes three central dimensions: social status as psychological need, social status as social status, and social status as class status. Deterrence of social status includes the following categories: teacher's imagery, inappropriate social imagery of the teacher, systematic discrimination, lack of professional identity, job gaps, lack of accountability and institutional support, sense of institutional inefficiency, media inefficiency, Weak trade union organization, professional inefficiency, and unequal power relations. Also promoting social status such as macro policy reform, institutional cohesion and cooperation, job identity development, professional empowerment, strengthening social authority, strengthening social authority, reforming managerial and organizational practices, strengthening teacher-centered participation, improving welfare facilities and Includes strengthening trade union organization. Conclusion: The social status of teachers is a cultural and social matter that finds meaning based on the context of teachers' activities.