درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

"در عصر شتابان ارتباطات علاوه بر ترجمه های گوناگون در زمینه های مختلف شاهد ترجمه های مکرر از یک اثر نیز هستیم. دلایل پرداختن به ترجمه اثری که قبلا ترجمه شده چیست؟ این مقاله در نظر دارد با ارایه تعریفی از ترجمه مجدد به بررسی تفاوت های موجود بین ترجمه و ترجمه مجدد بپردازد. در این پژوهش تاثیر گذر زمان بر روی متون و ترجمه آنها مورد مطالعه قرار می گیرد تا مشخص گردد چرا برخی از ترجمه ها همواره می درخشند و برخی دیگر در طی زمان رنگ می بازند؟ برای مشخص کردن دلایل ترجمه کتابی که پیش از آن ترجمه شده داستان شازده کوچولو نوشته آنتوان دو سنت اگزوپری را به عنوان نمونه انتخاب کردیم تا ابعاد این مساله را بررسی کنیم.

This study aimed at investigating the relative impact of comprehensible input and comprehensible output on the development of grammatical accuracy and syntactic complexity of Iranian EFL learners’ oral production. Participants were 60 female EFL learners selected from a whole population pool of 80 based on the standard test of IELTS. To investigate the research questions, the participants were randomly divided into three groups: Input group, output group, and control group. The study involved two phases: the pre-task phase, and the main-task phase. During the pre-task phase, the input group received comprehensible input. In the same phase, the output group was pushed to be engaged in comprehensible output production. The control group neither received input, nor was engaged in output production. In the main-task phase, all subjects performed monologues that were separately recorded, and later transcribed and coded in terms of accuracy and complexity through Bygate's (2001) standard coding system and finally scored. The statistical analysis of the results revealed that while the output group outperformed the input group in grammatical accuracy, the input group proved to be more rigorous and influential in developing speech complexity. The study supports Swain’s (1985) claim that there are roles for comprehensible output that are different from and independent of comprehensible input, and Skehan & Foster's (2001) theory regarding human beings’ limited attentional capacities that can be devoted to one aspect of oral speech at the expense of the other. Generally, it is implied that the most effective way for improving oral speech, based on the literature and the results obtained from this study, is an eclectic approach which conflates both comprehensible input and comprehensible output.

The present study was conducted to investigate whether there was a relationship between EFL learners’ use of language learning strategies and their self-perceived language proficiency at the two levels of intermediate and advanced. A total of 67 subjects (39 intermediate-level and 28 advanced) were selected to participate in this study based on their scores on a piloted language proficiency test. They were asked to respond to two questionnaires: one assessing their self-perceived language proficiency and the other the strategy inventory of language learning. The results of the statistical analysis demonstrated that there was a significant relationship between the two variables among advanced-level subjects while no such relationship existed among intermediates. Thence, as learners reach higher stages of language proficiency, they become more capable of assessing their language abilities and also use their learning strategies more often. Further analysis also revealed that subjects did not change their attitude in using strategies as they reached higher stages of proficiency except for memory and social strategies. Finally, the results showed that the most frequently used set of strategies among both intermediate and advanced learners were cognitive while the least were affective.