درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Intercultural communication takes place when individuals influenced by different cultural communities negotiate shared meanings in interaction. As every country has its own cultural value system; consequently, nonverbal communication is different from country to country. Therefore, having knowledge about the similarities and differences of nonverbal communication in different cultures increases the possibility of being understood and reduces the risk of being misunderstood and misinterpreted by people from different cultural backgrounds. The current paper aims to investigate and compare the interpretations of nonverbal messages between the findings of Pease and Pease (2004), two prominent figures in the field of nonverbal communication in Western societies and the Iranian students of English and non-English major as an example of an Eastern society. In this study, 32 body gestures were selected from among 170 pictures used by Pease and Pease (2004) and the Iranian students’ interpretations of those body gestures were investigated. The results showed that the interpretations were significantly different across Western and Iranian students; however, there was no significant difference between English and non-English major students’ interpretations.

Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see how Kurdish-speaking learners of English employ appraisal resources in their writings. It further aimed to explore whether the appraisal framework can be utilized as an assessment scale for evaluating the students’ argumentative writing. To this end, the study investigated the argumentative essays written by 15 bilingual Kurdish-Iranian graduates of English within the framework of the appraisal theory. The instruments applied in this study consisted of a modified rating scale for assessing the essays in terms of the macrostructures exploited in them and the framework for the analysis of appraisal resources. Quantitative findings revealed high-graded essays employ more attitudinal items and fewer monoglossic resources than low-graded ones. Qualitatively, the high-graded essays articulated attitudinal values in nominal forms and sometimes in a backgrounded manner while these values were mostly presented by surge of feelings and in a foregrounded way in the low-graded essays. Regarding engagement, unlike the high-graded essays, the low-graded ones were poor in recognizing other voices and alternative positions. Inspired by the strength of the appraisal model evaluating writing, results suggest that high-graded essays are successful in positioning readers attitudinally and clarifying the ethical message to readers.

Language and culture are now deemed to be co-constitutive; hence English language teaching (ELT) textbooks should incorporate cultural aspects and promote intercultural competence. However, careful decisions should be made as regards to the cultural content of materials and the ways in which culture is represented. This study was an attempt to deconstruct the patterns of cultural representation and intercultural interactions in Interchange textbooks, an ELT textbook series taught to English as a foreign language (EFL) learners in Iran. Using content analysis of texts and images and with the focus on nationality, gender and race, it examined how different cultures were reflected in Interchange 1, Interchange 2, Interchange 3, and whether cultural bias or inequality was present. The quantitative and qualitative data analysis revealed that the white male group was dominant in all three textbooks. And, to use Kachru’s (1985) terms, inner, outer and expanding circle nationalities were represented in the textbooks, with the expanding circle constituting the major nationality, but American culture of inner circle was predominant. Additionally, the interactions were mainly limited to superficial aspects of the target culture although these textbooks sought to show various intercultural interactions. Dominance of male and white characters and the US culture indicated inequality in race and gender, and the superficial treatment of culture in the textbooks. Less attention to the hybrid culture and deeper level of intercultural aspects, i.e. critical reflections, in the textbooks suggests that the materials be supplemented by EFL teachers’ constructive discussion of the cultures that interact.

این تحقیق، با استفاده از یک برنامه ی چندرسانه ای رایانه ای، به بررسی تاثیر زیرنویس متون بر درک شنیداری ویادگیری واژگان در زبان خارجی پرداخته است. علاوه براین، تاثیر ترتیب ارائه ی زیرنویس (درمرتبه اول یا دوم) و تعامل آن با سطح دانش زبانی فراگیران زبان را درعملکرد درک شنیداری و واژگان آنان بررسی کرده است. به منظور نیل به این اهداف، یک نرم افزاری رایانه ای طراحی شد و از 200 نفر از فراگیران زبان خارجی ( 100 نفر سطح متوسط-بالا و 100 نفر سطح متوسط -پایین) خواسته شد که در این تحقیق شرکت کنند. شرکت کنندکان به طور تصادفی به چهار گروه تقسیم شدند: گروه زیرنویس (با دومرتبه گوش دادن به متون همراه با زیرنویس)، گروه بدون زیرنویس (با دومرتبه گوش دادن به متون بدون زیرنویس)، گروه اول زیرنویس (با گوش دادن به متون مرتبه ی اول همراه با زیرنویس و مرتبه-ی دوم بدون زیرنویس)، گروه دوم زیرنویس (با گوش دادن به متون مرتبه ی اول بدون زیرنویس و مرتبه ی دوم همراه با زیرنویس). آنان دومرتبه به چهار متن شنیداری (داستان کوتاه) گوش دادند و به آزمون های درک شنیداری و واژگان ازطریق نرم افزار و رایانه پاسخ دادند. نتایج بدست آمده ازآزمون تی و تحلیل واریانس دوسویه نشانگر این مسئله بود که عملکرد زبان آموزان درداستان های زیرنویس شده موثرتر بود، ولی ترتیب ارایه ی زیرنویس تاثیر معنا داری درعملکرد آنها در درک شنیداری و واژگان نداشت. بالاخره، تعامل معنا داری بین ترتیب ارایه ی زیرنویس و سطح دانش زبانی در دو گروه مشاهده نگردید.