درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Iran’s First National Consultative Assembly (Parliament) was established when Iran was in a weak economic condition. erefore, the members of this parliament focused on overcoming the -nancial problems and economic obstacles, and they established their -rst specialized working group titled ""Malieh (Finance) Commission”. However, the parliament members faced many problems in covering their personal living expenses due to leaving their personal jobs and having to reside in Tehran. Consequently, the National Consultative Assembly had to -nd a solution to a new challenge: -nancial support of its members. e main question of this research is: being short of -nancial resources and having no -nancial and administrative experience in the parliamentary system, what -nancial and administrative measurements and framework did the parliament use to pay the salaries of its sta and members? In applying the method of historical research, all the necessary pieces of information were gathered from library resources, focusing on the records existing in the Document Center of Iran’s Parliament. is information was processed in a rational historical sequence and then analyzed. e -ndings of this research show that the First National Consultative Assembly of Iran was only able to pay a small amount of its sta and members’ salary by applying the -nancial and administrative experiences of the governmental system of Iran. A signi-cant proportion was postponed to the next rounds of the Parliament when it was paid to them or their heirs. e period of the -rst National Consultative Assembly was so short that the members only focused on solving the country’s economic problems, and its -nancial resources were so inadequate that they could only pay limited attention to the internal a airs of the Parliament. Consequently the First Parliament did not have an orderly approach to -nancial management

ولایت تکوینى از مهم ترین شئون اهل بیت علیهم السلام به شمار مى رود. برخى از معاصران توانایى مخلوقات برتصرف در امور تکوینى را منکر شده و آن را مستلزم غلو و خروج از دایره توحید برشمرده اند. در مقابل،گروه قابل توجهى از اندیشمندان آن را پذیرفته و مستلزم محذور شرک و غلو نمى دانند. همچنین گروهى اینولایت را حداقلى و برخى آن را حداکثرى و به معناى تدبیر کل عالم تفسیر کرده اند. در این مقاله با روشتوصیفى تحلیلى و گردآورى کتابخانه اى، ضمن ذکر دلایل هر کدام از اقوال سه گانه مذکور، به بررسى و نقدآنها پرداخته شده است. مقاله معتقد است: شأن ولایت تکوینى به معناى تصرف فى الجمله در جهان هستى،واقعیتى است که در راستاى توحید افعالى قابل تفسیر و پذیرش مى باشد و از طرق متعدد نقلى به اثباترسیده است. با این حال، فراتر از مقام ثبوت و امکان، حداکثرى بودن این تصرف به این معنا که اهل بیتمتصدى خلق و رزق عالم هستى باشند به اثبات نرسیده است.