درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models, offer new possibilities for language learning. This study, grounded in sociocultural theory, examined the impact of an AI assistant ( Monica ) on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ writing development. A total of 120 male students (aged 26–36, A2 proficiency) participated in a four-month in-service program. The participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group, which engaged in AI-mediated collaborative writing, or a control group, which collaborated face-to-face. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, integrating pretest–posttest measures, questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analyses (Split-Plot ANOVA) showed that the AI-assisted group significantly outperformed the control group in Organization, Language Use, and Mechanics, but not in Content or Vocabulary. Importantly, students’ perceptions shifted dramatically: While only 23% initially held positive expectations, 90% reported positive experiences post-intervention, highlighting the role of affective factors in technology adoption. Qualitative data confirmed cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational benefits of AI interaction, but also revealed challenges including overreliance on AI, uncritical acceptance of feedback, difficulty integrating new vocabulary, and cognitive overload when faced with multiple corrections. Sociocultural concerns, such as academic integrity, face-saving practices, and peer judgment, further influenced student engagement. From a theoretical standpoint, the study contributes to sociocultural scholarship by evidencing the ways in which student–AI interaction shapes and mediates writing development. Pedagogically, it calls for intentional scaffolding to foster critical and reflective practices, reframing AI not as a functional tool but as a meaningful collaborator in the learning process.

This study investigated the effects of gamified language teaching on motivation and writing proficiency of Iranian pre-intermediate English as a foreign language (EFL) learners. Adopting a mixed-methods design, the study involved 60 learners aged 12–16, registered in four language classes of a private institute. Two classes were randomly selected as experimental groups receiving gamified language instruction, and two classes were chosen as control groups receiving traditional instruction. The quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-writing tasks scored using Jacobs et al.’s (1981) analytic rubric and a validated Persian version of Dörnyei and Taguchi’s (2009) motivation questionnaire. The results of mixed-design Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed that learners exposed to digital gamification demonstrated significantly greater gains in motivation and writing performance than those in the control group. The qualitative data from semi-structured interviews further supported these findings, revealing themes of increased motivation, enhanced engagement, perceived improvement in writing skills, user-friendly technology, and a strong preference for gamified learning. The findings suggest that well-designed digital gamification can effectively enhance both affective and linguistic outcomes in EFL writing instruction. Pedagogical implications highlight the importance of aligning game elements with instructional goals while balancing extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation.

Though research into the dynamic nature of motivation has gained momentum, there are still some aspects of the issue which are in need of further scrutiny. One such under-researched area is the effect of different learning modules on the direction and pattern of motivational changes, particularly in virtual learning environments. Informed by this gap, the current study explored how EFL learners’ motivation fluctuates based on different learning modules. In so doing, the participants were selected from institute, high school and university contexts. Thus, a major objective of the study was probing the differences among the three contexts as regards motivational fluctuations caused by involvement with different lesson modules. Motometer was utilized as the main means of data collection. Also, in an attempt to triangulate the data collection procedure, retrospective thinking was employed following the collection of Motometer data. Based on the findings, for institute learners, the mid-time of their performance process was the peak motivation time. Furthermore, it was found that the learners experienced more motivation on the activities included in the oral module as opposed to reading activities. Conversely, high school students reached higher levels of motivation on the reading module as opposed to speaking and listening sections. Finally, although significant differences were identified between the institute and school settings concerning mean motivational values for oral modules, no significant difference was observed among the patterns of motivational fluctuations occurring for institute, high school and university students on reading module. The implications of the findings are discussed throughout the paper.

Despite its pivotal importance in comprehension and production, many English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners struggle with retrieving and applying new vocabulary beyond class. This study investigated the comparative effects of the Ripple Effect Approach (REA) and the Word Wall Approach (WWA) on vocabulary retrieval and production among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Sixty participants (30 females and 30 males), aged between 18 and 23 years ( M age = 20.5), were selected through the Preliminary English Test (PET) and randomly divided into two experimental groups. The REA group was taught through interconnected, contextualized vocabulary exercises, while the WWA group received visual aids and interactive word displays. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design was employed, with data collected through vocabulary tests. Statistical analyses, including repeated-measures ANOVA and MANOVA, revealed significant improvements in vocabulary retrieval and production for both groups. However, the REA group demonstrated higher retention rates, with a mean increase of 3.6 points in retention from pre-test to post-test, compared to a 3.2-point increase for the WWA group. These findings underscore the effectiveness of interactive and varied instructional approaches in enhancing vocabulary acquisition and retention among EFL learners. Implications for educators suggest incorporating the REA and WWA to meet diverse learner needs and improve teaching practices, emphasizing the importance of integrating innovative, learner-centered techniques into educational curricula. Incorporating these approaches might develop adaptive and responsive educational frameworks, enhancing EFL learners’ learning outcomes and experiences.

Although generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping language education globally, its integration into English for Specific Purposes (ESP) instruction in Iran has remained limited by rigid curricula, restricted autonomy, and lack of authentic, discipline-specific resources. This study sought to address this gap by developing a contextualized co-design framework to align AI affordances with local pedagogical realities. Guided by theoretical triangulation, a hybrid methodology was employed that combined design-based research, co-design, and participatory qualitative approaches. The needs analysis phase involved twenty-six ESP stakeholders, including eight instructors and eighteen learners. In-depth interviews were then conducted with a subset of nineteen participants—eight instructors and eleven learners. Three instructors and three learners, chosen purposively among those involved in both prior phases, along with three policymakers and three AI experts, participated in the last co-design phase to ensure multiple perspectives in model development. As revealed by the findings, the learners prioritized personalization, writing support, and disciplinary adaptability, whereas the instructors emphasized controlled prompting, ethical literacy, and assessment redesign. Concerns shared between the two groups included overreliance, epistemic authority, and unequal digital access. The co-design process generated a cyclical instructional model incorporating dual human-check mechanisms, ethical self-reporting, bias-awareness checkpoints, multimodal feedback loops, and institutionalized teacher training. Offering a theoretically grounded and adaptable reference for discipline-specific AI use in ESP programs, this study’s framework can guide educators, curriculum designers, and policymakers in ESP contexts analogous to those investigated in this research.

Foreign language test anxiety (FLTA) affects learners' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to language assessments. Despite extensive research on its causes and effects, a comprehensive understanding from the learners' perspective remains underexplored. This study aims to synthesize qualitative and mixed-methods research on the antecedents and consequences of FLTA, with a focus on learners’ experiences and perceptions. A systematic search was conducted across primary education and psychology databases for studies published from 1990 to 2025. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidelines. Studies were appraised for methodological quality using the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting (ETR) checklist of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Thematic synthesis and meta-ethnographic translation were used to integrate findings from the selected studies. The review identified key antecedents of FLTA, including learner-level factors (e.g., low self-efficacy, perfectionism, prior academic failure, and inadequate self-regulatory skills), test-design features (e.g., time pressure, difficulty, unfamiliar formats, and unclear criteria), and broader assessment cultures marked by high stakes, exam-driven teaching, and social pressures. The consequences of FLTA were multifaceted, ranging from cognitive interference and reduced performance to avoidance behaviors, reliance on short-term strategies, and negative impacts on long-term engagement with language learning. Positive changes were associated with alternative assessment practices, such as portfolios and formative assessment. The findings suggest practical recommendations for language teachers, curriculum designers, and policymakers to create assessment environments that reduce FLTA and support learner well-being.

To be proficient in writing, learners of foreign languages are expected to communicate effectively and effortlessly with native speakers. Collocations, defined as the natural pairings of words, are essential for achieving proficiency in a language and enhancing writing quality. This research explored how incidental and intentional instruction of collocations affected the participants’ written task scores. This study included 60 students at the pre-intermediate level who studied English at Safir Language School in Tehran, Iran. These students were grouped according to their proficiency test results to ensure homogeneity. They used the Touchstone series and the English Collocations in Use as their primary textbooks. After each unit, they had to do a written task. The results indicated that both incidental and intentional instruction positively impacted the students' writing scores. Notably, those in the incidental instruction group outperformed their counterparts in the intentional group. The findings showed incidental instruction of collocations was more effective than intentional teaching.  The outcomes of the study can assist educators in choosing effective teaching strategies for collocations to boost writing performance, syllabus designers in incorporating these insights into educational materials to enhance vocabulary instruction, teachers in emphasizing the benefits of incidental learning, and learners in focusing on the importance of collocations, as unfamiliarity with these word combinations may hinder their writing skills. Conducting studies with larger sample sizes to validate the findings in broader settings, and exploring incidental/intentional teaching to students with varying skills, expertise, gender, and experiences are also suggested for further studies. 

Teaching and learning have long struggled with burnout, a condition of mental exhaustion. Burnout has turned out to be influenced by several antecedents; the effects of some such as self-efficacy, motivation, and enjoyment have already been addressed, whereas those of others remain to be considered. Due to persistent burnout among students and several unidentified contributing factors, this study investigates how proactive personality and L2 grit impact L2 burnout. The following are hypothesized: 1. proactive personality can negatively predict burnout among Iranian L2 learners. 2. L2 grit can negatively predict burnout among Iranian L2 learners. A total of 613 students, which comprise 315 females and 298 males, studying at various senior and junior high schools in Semnan, Iran, were selected through convenience sampling; they were provided with a questionnaire quantifying how proactive and gritty they are. Subsequently, the data was analyzed using SPSS 22, showing that both proactive personality and grit negatively predict burnout; proactive personality alone explained 6.4% of the variance (R² = .064), while L2 Grit explained 62.0% (R² = .620). It can be concluded that higher levels of both antecedents reduce learner burnout.

The present study examines the role of translation in promoting new sciences in Dar al-Fonun, the first modern school of higher education in Iran during the Nasseri period (1831-1896). Amir Kabir, the chief minister under Nasser al-Din Shah – following his modernization programs for the development of Iran subsequent to the Western industrial revolution after which Iran experienced a delay in benefiting from advancement in science and technology during the early 19th century – established Dar al-Fonun school in a Western and European style with the aim of promoting and strengthening science and knowledge so that Iranian specialists could be trained in various scientific fields. As a result, translation became one of the tools for introducing modern sciences to Iran in order to fight against the country’s backwardness in various fields. The period covered by this research is from 1851 to 1896 – from the foundation of the school to the end of the Nasseri era. The results of the study, conducted by using library method, second-hand sources and their content analysis, show that translation in various ways enabled Iranian students to benefit from modern higher education and after graduation, they served as experts in various fields, making a huge contribution to the expansion of modern sciences for the development of the country.

Songs in animated musicals are far from homogenous; they belong to distinct genres, each fulfilling different communicative purposes, emotional tones, and narrative functions. This diversity requires genre-sensitive translation strategies, yet much existing scholarship continues to treat song dubbing as a uniform practice, overlooking how genre shapes translational choices. To address this gap, the present study adopts a functionalist, genre-based perspective, drawing on Reiss’s (1971/2000) text typology, to investigate the role of genre in shaping dubbing strategies in the Persian versions of animated musicals. The corpus consists of six English-language animated musicals and their Persian dubbed counterparts. Songs are categorized into three genres, including background songs, plot-related songs, and entertaining songs, and examined in relation to translation strategies adapted from Gottlieb (1992) and reformulated by Ghomi (2009). The analysis reveals a strong correlation between song genre and translation method, showing that genre-specific function in animated musicals plays a critical role in sustaining narrative cohesion and enhancing audience engagement. By demonstrating how song genre systematically informs translation choices, this study contributes to the expanding field of audiovisual translation and to the specialized area of song dubbing.

This study investigates the localization of the rulebook of the board game Modern Art into its Persian version, by focusing on multimodal translation. Taylor’s (2016) framework was employed to examine multimodal translation of the rulebook by focusing on four types of elements, being linguistic, semiotic, cultural, and narrative. To analyze linguistic changes, translation techniques proposed by L. Molina and A. Hurtado Albir (2002) were used, and the findings indicate that reduction, adaptation, and amplification were the most frequently used techniques. Regarding semiotic changes, the matrix proposed by Kostelnick and Roberts (2011) was applied, and the results revealed significant changes, such as modifications in images and the use of exclamation marks. Cultural analysis demonstrated major changes, including the replacement of all the artists featured in the board game. By contrast, the localized version of the board game did not alter its narrative. Overall, the localized version adapts the artworks and artists while preserving the mechanics and essence of the original board game.

Although email correspondence is a common means of communication between scholars from different cultures, little attention is paid to writing academic emails in tertiary education. The present investigation is aimed at studying the influence of genre education on the formation of academic writing skills and understanding the principles of academic correspondence. The main methods used in the study were experiment and survey. The research was carried out on the basis of National Research Nuclear University MEPhI. The participants of the study were postgraduate (PhD) students (n = 100) with a major in Physics, Electronics, Computer Science, and other technical areas. The results of the study show that the students made considerable progress in their academic email writing skills even after a short period of explicit instruction applying the genre-based approach. Most of the students changed their way of thinking about writing emails for academic purposes in English and became aware of the norms of formal writing. Moreover, the results of the experiment and survey justify the necessity of including academic email writing in the curriculum of teaching Academic English and demonstrate strong potential of genre-based learning in other genres involving academic writing.

Navigating the technology-saturated landscape of language education poses a daunting task for present-day parents. As primary companions in EFL learners’ online learning journey, parents need to help them cultivate online language education. Guided by the parental mediation theory, the present study's primary objective was to examine any correlation between parental mediation strategies and Iranian EFL learners' online learning self-efficacy. Inspired by Vygotsky’s (1978) social development theory, which posits that knowledge is constructed within a social context, and Valkenburg et al.’s (2013) autonomy-supportive mediation, the second aim of the study was to uncover strategies that help promote digital parenting to foster learners’ self-efficacy in online language learning. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, data were gathered through questionnaires from 414 Iranian EFL learners aged between 12 and 18, selected through non-probability convenience sampling. Additionally, 47 learners, their parents, and 15 EFL teachers were voluntarily interviewed. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that restrictive mediation and monitoring strategies reduced learners’ online learning self-efficacy while active mediation enhanced it. Reflexive thematic analysis of the interviews also revealed that digital parenting practices, which consider learners’ autonomy and encourage cooperative engagement between learners and parents, will nurture self-regulated online language learners. The findings could set a new benchmark for digital parents, helping them bring up children capable of judiciously leveraging online opportunities.