درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The purpose of the study reported in this article was to explore images and metaphors English learners have in mind for vocabulary learning. First, 350 learners in seven cities in Iran with considerable experience of English learning were asked to compare vocabulary learning to concrete objects and activities. Their 130 analogies were reviewed and analyzed multiple times to identify fitting labels and assign inclusive categories. The five most frequent themes which emerged from the analysis were FOOD & DRINK, COLLECTING, JOURNEY, PUZZLE/PROBLEM, and MUSIC. Based on a scrutiny of the metaphorical themes and the images which gave rise to them, some salient practical and theoretical points with implications for teaching language and vocabulary are tentatively discussed.

The present study is an attempt to explore any significant relationships between learners’ preferences for error correction, demotivation, and language proficiency (LP). One hundred Iranian EFL students, including both males and females, studying at the departments of foreign languages of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman and Tehran University took part in this study. In order to obtain the required data, two questionnaires and a proficiency test were utilized: the learners’ preferences for error correction questionnaire (Fukuda, 2004) to measure learners’ preferences for error correction, the demotivation questionnaire (Sakai & Kikuchi, 2009) to measure demotivation, and Michigan Test (1997) to measure the learners’ language proficiency level. The findings of this study revealed that first, there was a significant negative relationship between the learners’ preferences for error correction and demotivation (- 0.79): the more satisfied learners are with the error corrections they receive, the less demotivated they will be; second, there was a significant positive relationship between learners’ preferences for error correction and LP (0.69): the higher the learners’ satisfaction with error corrections they receive, the higher their level of LP; third, there was a significant negative relationship between demotivation and LP (- 0.59): the more demotivated learners are, the less their scores of LP will be.

Vocabulary is an important component of language proficiency which provides the basis for learners’ performance in other skills. But, since vocabulary learning seems to be so demanding, learners tend to forget newly-learnt words quite soon. In order to identify vocabulary learning conditions which can produce a more lasting effect, this study investigated the effect of three kinds of gloss conditions, that is traditional non-CALL marginal gloss, audio gloss, and extended audio gloss, on vocabulary gain of EFL learners. To this end, three experimental and one control groups, each comprising 15 participants, took part in the current study. In order to ensure that the participants were from the right proficiency level, KET (Key English Test) was used as the homogenizing tool. Participants in each group read two unseen passages under one of the three mentioned conditions for experimental groups, with no gloss offered for control group. They all completed one pre-test, one reading session, one post-test, and one delayed post-test of vocabulary. The data were analyzed using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs for both immediate and delayed post-tests. Statistical analyses of the results revealed that the audio gloss group, who were provided with the voice of a speaker to read the meaning of the target word, and extended audio gloss group, who had access to audio gloss as well as L2 English example, both significantly outperformed the other groups in terms of vocabulary acquisition in both the immediate retention and in the delayed retention of key words. Further results and implications are discussed in the paper.

The present study seeks to investigate the potentiality of the translation task as a testing method for measuring reading comprehension. To achieve this objective, two types of translation tests, open-ended and multiple-choice tests, and two types of reading comprehension tests, multiple-choice reading comprehension and open-ended cloze tests were developed in this study. The reliability of the tests was computed in order to estimate which translation test was more reliable and valid. Correlation coefficients were run in order to investigate whether translation tests worked as reliable and valid measures of reading comprehension, and to examine the relationship between proficiency in reading comprehension and proficiency in translation. The results indicate that the open-ended translation test is more reliable and valid than the multiple-choice one; translation has a high potentiality to work as a reliable and valid tool to assess reading comprehension; and there exists a high positive correlation between the participants’ proficiency in reading comprehension and their proficiency in translation. The findings of this study might have pedagogical implications for instructors. They may be justified to highlight the role of translation tests and benefit from them in their reading comprehension classes.

این تحقیق تاثیر آموزش توسعه راهبردهای خودتنظیمی را بر نگارش ایجابی و خود کارایی فراگیران ایرانی زبان انگلیسی بررسی کرده و میزان تاثیر این نوع آموزش راهبردی را با آموزش غیرراهبردی (سنتی) مقایسه نموده است. در این تحقیق از مدل توسعه ی راهبردهای خودتنظیمی شامل نمودار کمک حافظه و جدول واژگان انتقالی، مقاله های نمونه ایجابی و سازمان دهنده تصویری استفاده شده است. برای بررسی اهداف تحقیق، 60 فراگیر ایرانی زبان انگلیسی در مقطع لیسانس از دو دانشگاه در این تحقیق شرکت کردند و از شیوه ی نیمه تجربی پیش آزمون-پس آزمون با گروه شاهد استفاده شد. تجزیه و تحلیل کوواریانس نشان داد که هر دو نوع آموزش راهبردی خودتنظیمی و آموزش غیرراهبردی تاثیر مثبتی بر نگارش ایجابی فراگیران داشت، لیکن تاثیر راهبردهای خودتنظیمی، بر توانش نگارش ایجابی فراگیران زبان انگلیسی در زمینه های فرم و محتوای نگارش، سازماندهی و انسجام، ساختار جمله و واژگان در مهارت نگارش به مراتب بیشتر و به لحاظ آماری معنادار بود. هم چنین خودکارایی فراگیرانی که آموزش توسعه راهبردهای خودتنظیمی داشتند در نگارش بهبود یافت، ولیکن عملکرد بهتر آن ها نسبت به فراگیرانی که آموزش غیرراهبردی داشتند در پس آزمون به لحاظ آماری چندان معناداری نشان نداد. نتایج این تحقیق توجه مدرسان زبان را به بعد آگاهی فراشناختی نگارش و اهمیت تدریس راهبردهای خود تنظیمی به عنوان راهی برای کسب خود مختاری و خود کارایی در مهارت نگارش معطوف می دارد.

هدف اصلی این مقاله بررسی اعتبار زبان و عوامل هوشی به منظور طبقه بندی عملکرد انشا نویسی در فراگیران زبان انگلیسی ایرانی می باشد. از شرکت کنندگان ایرانی این مطالعه سه آزمون به منظور بررسی دستور زبان، وسعت و عمق واژگان، و دوآزمون به منظور بررسی هوش کلامی و روایتی گرفته شد. همچنین شرکت کنندگان تعدادی انشای تحلیلی در پاسخ به نمونه آیلتس انجام دادند. تعدادی تحلیل تابع تفکیکی برای بررسی قدرت طبقه بندی پنج متغیر با هدف تمایز بین توانایی بالا و پایین نویسندگان زبان دوم مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که در میان عوامل زبانی، عمق واژگان (دانش هم نشینی) بهترین عملکرد تفکیک را تولید می کند. به طور کلی، هوش روایتی قابل اطمینان ترین پیش بینی کننده برای عضویت در گروه های پایین و بالا ارزیابی شد. همچنین مشخص شد که در میان پنج زیر سازه هوش روایتی، ""طراحی داستانی"" بالاترین ارزش طبقه بندی را داراست. در نهایت، کاربردها ی این پژوهش برای پژوهشگران زبان دوم، متخصصان علوم شناختی و زبانشناسان کاربردی مورد بحث قرار گرفت.