بررسی رابطه ی توسعه ی گردشگری و سرمایه ی اجتماعی در نواحی روستایی، مطالعه ی موردی: دهستان سولقان (شهرستان تهران) (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
سرمایه ی اجتماعی را می توان به عنوان زیربنای توسعه ی گردشگری در نواحی روستایی به شمار آورد. در همین رابطه باید به پیامدهای توسعه ی گردشگری اشاره نمود که به عنوان یک فعالیت پر رونق می تواند سرمایه های مختلف نواحی روستایی را با تحول همراه سازد. بنابراین در جهت توسعه ی گردشگری و ارتقاء سرمایه ی اجتماعی در روستاها بررسی رابطه ی بین این دو ضروری به نظر می رسد. بر همین اساس این پژوهش در راستای پاسخگویی به این سؤال که «بین سطح توسعه ی گردشگری و میزان سرمایه ی اجتماعی در روستاهای دهستان سولقان چه رابطه ای وجود دارد؟» تدوین یافته است. تحقیق حاضر از نوع کاربردی و روش انجام آن توصیفی-تحلیلی است. تهیه ی داده های مورد نیاز مبتنی بر روش میدانی است. جامعه ی آماری این پژوهش، خانوارهای محلی ساکن در روستاهای محدوده ی مطالعاتی است که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران تعداد 195سرپرست خانوار به عنوان حجم نمونه تعیین شدند. همچنین تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با بهره گیری از نرم افزار Spss (آمار توصیفی و استنباطی) انجام شده است. نتایج بدست آمده مبین وجود رابطه ی مستقیم معنادار آماری بین توسعه ی گردشگری و سرمایه ی اجتماعی است.Correlation Analysis Between Tourism Development and Social Capital in Rural Area Case study: Soleghan District (Tehran County)
Extended
Introduction
Rural areas in their way to development need some social capital so that in its absence, it makes nonsense of other capitals and it is then difficult to proceed to development and cultural and economic evolution. So, in the issue of tourism in rural areas, its relationship with social capital is of importance, Social Capital is the base of tourism development in rural area. Rural tourism is considered as a device to access economical, social growth as well as recreation. So far developed actions are taken for developing tourism as an effective source for income and creating jobs in rural areas. This kind of tourism is grabbed attention with the goal of local areas sustainable development as a device for economical, social development and one of the most important jobs in rural areas. Tourism should be in harmony with number and kinds of users and those demands which are the feature of rural areas in order to be efficient and potentially sustainable. In this regard, tourism development consequences should be mention, because, as a profitable activity can evolutes different rural capitals. So, it seems necessary that tourism development and Social Capital gradation in rural area need to investigation about correlation between this two parameters. In this regard, this research pays to answer this question: which kind of relationship is there between tourism development and amount of social capital in rural area of Soleghan?
Materials and Methodology
Our research method of the present study is the descriptive analytical one that relies on both library and field methods. The study area is villages of souleghan dehestan located in kan. According to the 2006 census population of this dehestan are 63566. Five village selected as sample Villages based on criteria such as population, thriving tourist and location. Statistic society in this research is includes of: local household habitant in villages of case study, and sample volume were determinate with 195 of household headman using Cochran formula. Criteria for measures of social capital include three Criteria: social trust, social cohesion, solidarity and social participation (14 Index). For assess of tourism development level selected three Criteria include dependence rural employment to tourism income dependence of rural household to tourism. It is worth mentioning that we analyzed our data using SPSS (descriptive and deductive statistics).
Discussion and Results
Our results show that the levels of social capital in our surveyed villages are higher than the mean value and there is a statically significant difference in the level of social capital between the studied villages and there is also statically significant difference in the level of tourism development between them. In sum, in order to answer the key question of the study, we address to analyze correlation type using Pearson correlation coefficient. In this respect, results of our calculations show a statistically significant and direct relationship with alpha level of 0.01 between tourism development and social capital in the rural areas Soleghan district.
Conclusion
Regarding our results and admitting the role of social capital as the underlying fundamental of any development and regarding a statistically significant and direct relationship between this type of capital and tourism development in the rural areas, we should emphasize on taking various social bodies part in developing tourism in rural areas which can be led to promote social capital in these areas.