درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Objective: The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of group logotherapy on psychological distress and belief in a just world in M.S patients. Method: This is a quasi-Experimental study with both control and experimental group. The statistical population of this study was 583 MS patients in Ilam city in 1400. According to the quasi-Experimental research method with the control and experimental group, the number of samples was estimated to be 30 (15 in the control group and 15 in the Experimental group) who were selected by the Iranian MS Society through the introduction of the members of the association. sampling was done as a convenient method. To measure the variables, Kessler's Psychological Distress Assessment Questionnaire (K10), and the Fair World Belief Questionnaire were used by Sutton & Douglas (2005), Dalbert (1999), and Dalbert et al. (2001). The therapeutic intervention in this study was a group logotherapy package for MS patients, and treatment sessions (based on Mohammadi, E-Fard, and Heidari's dual therapy package, 2019). Spss24 software and Covariance or ANCOVA test were used to analyze the data. Results: This study showed a noteworthy contrast between the Experimental and control groups in terms of psychological distress and belief in a just world with a 95% certainty level. Subsequently, two primary theories of affirmation and zero suspicion were rejected. Conclusion: It was found that group logotherapy is compelling to mental trouble and belief in a just world in MS patients.

This study aims to explore how social media algorithms influence brand visibility and customer engagement for new ventures, identifying key strategies and challenges faced by these businesses. This qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to gather in-depth insights from 18 participants, including founders and social media managers of new ventures. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure relevance to the study's focus. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software, with data saturation achieved after 15 interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify recurring themes and subthemes related to social media algorithms, brand visibility, and customer engagement. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: the impact of algorithms on brand visibility, customer engagement through social media, and challenges in leveraging algorithms. Within these themes, subcategories included platform-specific algorithm changes, content optimization techniques, timing and frequency of posts, interaction with algorithmic features, engagement tactics, content personalization, influencer collaborations, resource allocation, platform dependency, knowledge gaps, and data privacy concerns. Participants highlighted the need for continuous adaptation to algorithm changes, effective content strategies, and personalized engagement tactics to enhance visibility and engagement, while also facing significant challenges such as resource constraints and maintaining ethical practices. The study concludes that understanding and effectively leveraging social media algorithms is essential for new ventures to enhance brand visibility and customer engagement.

Aim: The Ethical and Legal Issues Self-Efficacy in Counseling (ELICSES) has been developed to evaluate counselors' and psychologists' self-efficacy in ethical and legal issues. Psychometric properties of the ELICSES in Iranian counselors and psychologists remain a largely unexplored realm. Method: The present study, therefore, seeks to translate the scale from English to Persian while also investigating the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the ELICSES. Online sampling was utilized to collect data from four hundred and forty-seven counselors, psychologists, and trainees who participated in the study. Ethical and Legal Issues in the Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale and Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale were used in the study. Results: The results of face (all items earned greater than 1.5 except one item (1.2)), content (overall CVI > 0.79, CVR > 0.62), and construct validity (CMIN=3.65, CFI=0.922, RMSE=0.45; also AVE> .5 and CR> .7) indicated that the ELICSES held appropriate validity and reliability. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis confirm the three factors of the ELICSES among Iranian counselors, psychologists, and trainees. Conclusion: These results suggested the validity and reliability of the ELICSES in evaluating self-efficacy when it comes to ethical and legal issues among Iranian counselors, psychologists, and trainees