درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Universities require highly qualified and committed instructors to carry out the significant tasks of educating the future generation of the society. The primary interest of this study was to explore the construct of teacher commitment to determine its dimensions and components and finally design EFL Teachers’ Professional Commitment Questionnaire. First, through a thorough analysis of the available literature as well as a semi-structured interview, the core dimensions and components were opted. Then, in the second qualitative phase, the researcher designed the early draft of a structured questionnaire which was handed into 25 experts. Content Validity Ratio was computed to ensure validity. Subsequently, the modified draft of the EFL Teachers’ Professional Commitment Questionnaire was designed and administered to 70 EFL university instructors to investigate the validity and reliability of the instrument employing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. As a result, three dimensions of Commitment to Students, Commitment to Profession, and Commitment to University along with 10 components were confirmed. The practical implication of this study is a validated EFL Teachers’ Professional Commitment Questionnaire performing as an evaluative tool to assess the level of teachers’ commitment with respect to their commitment to students, university, and profession in the EFL academic context of Iran.

There has been increasing interest in utilizing corpora in linguistic research and pedagogy in recent years. Rhetorical organization of different sections of research articles may appear similar in various disciplines, but close examination may show subtle differences nonetheless. One of the features that has been at the center of attention especially in recent years is the idiomaticity of a discourse which can be examined from the perspective of multi-word units captured by the automatic retrieval of lexical bundles. This study takes a corpus-based approach for the identification of lexical bundles. A corpus of 801,894 words from 790 articles was collected. In order to fulfill the purposes of the present study, ABBYY FineReader 10 professional edition, Total Assistant, Antconc 3.2.3, and WordSmith Tools 5 were used to identify lexical bundles. Then these bundles were classified structurally and functionally based on the presented taxonomies in the literature. The results of the current study indicated that the writers of medical research articles mostly rely on text-oriented bundles in the discussion section of research articles to establish academic discourse.

Pragmatic assessment and consistency in rating are among the subject matters which are still in need of more profound investigations. The importance of the issue is highlighted when remembering that inconsistency in ratings would surely damage the test fairness issue in assessment and lead to much diversity in ratings. Our principal concern in this study was observing the criteria that American and Iranian EFL/ESL teachers consider when rating Iranian EFL learners’ pragmatic productions regarding the speech act of compliment. The instrument utilized in this study was WDCTs and a speech act rating questionnaire administered to sixty American and sixty Iranian EFL/ESL teachers. In order to come up with the criteria, the reasoning and justifications of the raters when rating learners’ pragmatic productions were analyzed carefully through content analysis. The results showed that overall the raters considered nine general criteria when rating. They included: “Strategy use”, “Affective factors”, “Politeness”, “Interlocutors’ relationships”, “Linguistic accuracy”, “Sincerity”, “Authenticity”, “Fluency”, and “Cultural issues”. Also, the most frequent criterion among the native and non-native raters was “Strategy use” and “Politeness” respectively. Finally, it was concluded that due to some inconsistencies and variations in the ratings and criteria of both native and non-native raters, it seems that both groups are in need of pragmatic workshops and training sessions. The results of this study can have important implications for EFL/ESL teacher educators who are considerate of the importance of pragmatic training and instruction.

تحقیق حاضر به بررسی اثرات دو نوع از انواع حاشیه نویسی تعاریف واژگان بر درک مطلب خواندن در میان دانشجویانی که در سطح متوسطی از مهارت زبانی هستند پرداخته است.بدین منظور، دو گروه آزمایشی مورد مطالعه به خواندن 10 متن آکادمیک تحت شرایط مختلف مبادرت ورزیدند. یکی از گروه ها، هنگام خواندن متن چندرسانه ای کامپیوتری، از تعاریف متنی که با اشاره گر ماوس بر صفحه نمایش ظاهر می شد استفاده کرد. گروه دیگر، هنگام خواندن متون، از تعاریف ترکیبی(متن و تصویر) که به آشکارسازی معانی کلید واژگان کمک می کرد بهره جست. گروه کنترل، در مقابل،از هیچ نوع حاشیه نویسی استفاده نکرد و تنها بر متد حدس زدن تکیه کرد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که گروه آزمایشی که از حاشیه نویسی ترکیبی استفاده کرده بود میانگین بالاتری را نسبت به دو گروه دیگر در آزمون درک مطلب کسب نمود. در عین حال، گروهی که از تعاریف متنی استفاده کرده بود نسبت به گروه کنترل میانگین بالاتری اخذ کرد. یک توجیه آن است که به احتمال زیاد حاشیه نویسی ترکیبی تعاریف واژگان در آشکارسازی بهتر و مؤثرتر واژگان کلیدی متن خواندن کمک بیشتری می کند که در نتیجه آن درک مطلب به نحو عمیق تری صورت می گیرد.