درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Georgia underwent a revolutionary transformation in 1979 and 2003; However, there are fundamental differences between the two revolutions, including in ideology, the extent and scope of revolutionary developments, the nature of social forces and movements, the nature of the former and post-political regimes, and the direction of their new foreign policy. The country has been very influential in both domestic and foreign arenas. With this in mind, this article seeks to examine why the Iranian revolution became social in 1979 while the Georgian revolution in 2003 was limited to the political sphere. It seems that the Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1979, in response to the quasi-modernism of the Pahlavi period and inspired by cultural and identity components, led to the formation of a discourse called self-return, which realized such a possibility without changing political, social, economic and Culture was not possible. But the color revolution in Georgia, under the influence of components of historical memory resulting from the suppression of nationalist and independence-seeking tendencies, saw a change in the ruling political structure as sufficient to achieve this goal. Data and information of this research have been collected through documentary (library) method and have been analyzed using comparative analysis method. In order to examine the above question and hypothesis, this comparative study first takes a brief look at the background of the formation of the two revolutions and then examines their possible differences and similarities.

The Islamic Revolution and the Islamic Republic, which arose from the nature-oriented thought of Imam Khomeini (ra), was a unified and cohesive matter that you had to dismantle all the structures and apparatuses of government and thread them all with a rosary thread, but in the meantime, and with the inability to A deep understanding of this nature-based event, some systems, could not, align with that basis and take a new foundation; Among them is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which in the field of diplomacy and diplomacy, in the Oral History Project of the Twelfth Government, in some respects, was clearly acknowledged by those in charge of foreign policy. The main question of the present article was how to theorize in order to align foreign policy and its responsible institution with the Islamic Revolution in the second step of the Islamic Revolution? By descriptive and analytical study in the framework of the thinking of the leaders of the Islamic Revolution, it was concluded that any structural reflections in this regard should originate from the fountain of the idea of ​​nature based on human dignity and naturalistic foreign policy and be the basis for reviewing the Foreign Ministry. Foreign law-making civilization appropriate to the Islamic Revolution in the second step of the Islamic Revolution.