درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The purpose of this research is to investigate the non-linear effect of size and capital structure of companies on profitability in the framework of threshold panel regression in companies listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. For this purpose, 105 companies from different industries were selected as a statistical sample between 2010 and 2021. Hypotheses testing were analyzed under two scenarios: linear multivariate regression and non-linear multivariate regression (threshold panel regression method). Profitability as a dependent variable, capital structure and company size as independent variables and equity, sales growth and company life as control variables were examined. The results of statistical analysis showed that there is no significant relationship between company size and profitability in a non-linear mode. In the case of a threshold panel, the size of the company is known as the threshold variable and the capital structure is known as the dependent variable of the regime. The threshold value was estimated at 15.89, since the model has a threshold limit, so two different regimes were obtained for the capital structure variable. In both regimes, the relationship between capital structure and non-linear profitability is negative and significant. In this way, in the first regime, the capital structure up to the threshold value of the company's size reduces the profitability, and in the second regime, when the capital structure value exceeds the threshold value, the capital structure has less effect on the profitability and increases the profitability. It reduces less than before. According to the obtained results, the companies that are in the second regime have a more favorable capital structure and profitability than the companies in the first regime.

Dividend policy has been an influential factor in corporate investment decisions and has been an issue in recent years. The monetary policy began with the creation of economic organizations and free trade markets during the financial crisis. These were the first examples of capital controls in the history of the European Union and had different effects on the financial position of companies. Since the Central Bank, the monetary policy council or any other monetary committee will change the volume of money by declaring and implementing monetary policies, we try to use a sample of the Middle East countries to distinguish between economic austerity and capital control and to assess the effects of the dividend on corporate capital decisions. All sample countries have a common financial reporting framework (International Financial Reporting Standards - IFRS), and some have a range of measures, from low-tight measures such as tax increases to more stringent measures such as enforcing capital controls. They implemented in order to stabilize their economy. To do this, we will specifically use two factors that determine information asymmetry in accounting: conditional conservatism and the level of revenue management

Considering that today's competitive environment is growing and the movement of organizations towards complexity and dynamism has started, the ability to learn earlier and faster than competitors will be the only relative advantage in the next decade and should The prospects and long-term and short-term contributions of organizations should be examined in a different way, and creativity, innovation along with the use of current information should be an inseparable part of managers' decision-making, and only an organization can claim superiority and success that To use the capabilities, commitment and learning capacity of employees at all levels of the organization in the best way. Based on this, the current research has studied the Board influence on the role of environmental innovation in the success and stock price risk. The statistical population of the research is all the Companies listed in Tehran Stock Exchange to the stock exchange, the period from 2014 to 2019 and the sample is 153 companies. Based on the investigations, the findings showed that environmental innovation has a positive and significant effect on the company's long-term success, and with the Board influence in the company, the role of environmental innovation on the company's long-term success shows a better effect. Also, environmental innovation has a positive and significant effect on the company's success in the short term, and with the Board influence in the company, the role of environmental innovation on the company's short-term success becomes more colorful (intense). Finally, environmental innovation has a negative and significant effect on the Stock price risk in the long run.