کرم الله دانش فرد

Public policy-making is a six-stage cycle, and the implementation of policies is one of the most sensitive stages of its formulation, failure in this stage leads to the failure of the entire policy-making process. Also, policy-making includes an interactive process between setting goals and necessary actions to realize them, which may be disrupted by many challenges, obstacles, and limitations. In this research, the goal was Pathology of implementation of rural development policies in the fourth and fifth development plans. This research is applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive and survey based on the nature of the data. The results of the research are presented in two qualitative and quantitative sections. In the main and qualitative part of the research, using the Delphi technique, we investigated the damage of rural development in the fourth and fifth programs. At first, using the opinions of experts, the gap between the existing state of rural development and the ideal state was determined, and based on the opinions of experts and the T-Tech test, it was determined that there is a fundamental difference between the current state and the ideal state. and in the current situation in the indicators of employment status, housing, medical and treatment facilities, digital infrastructure, transportation and communication route, industrial agriculture, welfare and recreation, cultural-educational, tourism and underground water the average quality was low. Therefore, the necessity of carrying out the pathology of the implementation of rural development policies became clearer. Then, based on the theoretical background of the research, as well as interviewing and completing the questionnaire by specialists and research elites, the indicators of developmental pathology were compiled, and finally, the final model of the questionnaire was compiled, and the quantitative results of the questionnaire were extracted based on the answers of the participants in the research. In the quantitative analysis and chi square test results, it was shown that the role of policy indicators, juridical and legal obstacles, political, social and economic factors, motivations and attitudes of executives, administrative system and bureaucracy, are insufficient and inappropriate. The lack of tools is significant in the absence of rural development.

Labor relations are a solution for solving organizational problems in order to solve the gaps in government organizations based on the macro policies of the administrative system. The purpose of the research is to identify and validate the drivers of labor relations for digital human resources in government organizations. The current research method is mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of philosophical presuppositions of pragmatism (pragmatism), in terms of cross-sectional data collection, and in terms of exploratory nature, researchers use purposeful sampling in the qualitative phase to collect data using From the method of theme analysis (topic) to interviews with human resource experts in the executive field in the administrative and employment organization with 15 people, they reached theoretical saturation and in the quantitative stage by using G-power specialized software using the sampling method. A simple random sampling of 155 people with the position of executive expert was selected as a sample. The tool of data collection in the qualitative stage was an interview and in the quantitative part, a questionnaire. Validity and reliability were confirmed in the qualitative phase by experts and in the quantitative phase by using composite, Cronbach, and shared reliability in Pls software. The findings of the article showed that digital communication, structural innovation, organizational factors, digital culture, employee retention, and legal factors were introduced as drivers of labor relations.