درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

هدف از این کار تحقیقی بررسی افعال با ماهیت معنایی «فریب» در لهجه های گویشوران مناطق مختلف تولا است. بر همین اساس، در این مقاله برآن هستیم تا ضمن تجزیه و تحلیل معانی مختلفی که از این گونه افعال استنباط می شود، شکل و ویژگی های دستوری این گونه افعال را در هنگام کاربرد در گویش های گوناگون مردم این مناطق بررسی نماییم. این گونه افعال غالباً ماهیت معنایی منفی دارند. افعال دارای ماهیت معنایی منفی در گویش ها و لهجه ها کاربرد بیشتری دارند. این گونه افعال از نظر تقسیم بندی در زمره افعالی قرار می گیرند که بیان گر نوع رابطه و رفتار افراد نسبت به محیط اطراف هستند. این افعال از اصلی ترین عناصر فعلی تشکیل دهنده گویش های محلی محسوب می شوند. از این گونه افعال معمولاً به عنوان افعال «انسان محور» یاد می شود. مجموعه افعالی که در این کار پژوهشی بررسی و تحلیل شده اند از نظر تک واژی ریشه های گوناگونی دارند. معمولاً تک واژهای ریشه ای این گونه افعال در معنای مستقیم و اولیه خود بیان گر تأثیرگذاری و یا تأثیرپذیری فیزیکی هستند و تا حدود زیادی از نظر شکل ظاهری و همچنین از نظر ماهیت معنایی فرم واحد و یکسانی دارند که وجود گروه افعال مترادف و زایا می تواند دلیلی بر این یک سان بودن باشد.

This research aimed to screen 'essay writing' difficulties that non-native university students at postgraduate levels usually experience regarding scholarly publication in mainstream, English journals. Two sets of variables including written literacy competencies in Persian and English languages were mapped over language uses (General vs. Academic). Initial screenings from one hundred Iranian students at PhD and MA levels with publication experiences in both Persian and English languages gave rise to some fifty-five participants randomly selected from different university disciplines (Humanities, Engineering, Medicine and Basic Sciences) and diverse university settings (Public and Private) across the country and classified via stratified sampling. A validated questionnaire from a large-scale project called ENEIDA (Moreno, 2011) was used for collecting the required data. Two measures were used to assess written literacy competencies across language uses: 1) participants' assumed, self-reported written literacy competencies in using English and Persian languages for General and Academic purposes were denoted as 'perceived' measures and 2) further supported by actual measures: mostly received comments from reviewers in the mainstream, English journals by the target group above. Findings were discussed in the light of recent lines of enquiries in Academic Literacy (AL) trends.

The current study investigated the effect of collaborative prewriting activities on learners’ identity construction and L2 writing development. To this end, 43 sophomore upper-intermediate university students majoring in Teaching English as a Foreign Language at an Iranian university who had enrolled in a course called Advanced Writing were randomly divided into two experimental groups (groups A and B) and one control group (group C). While the students in group A were involved in group activities, the students in group B were engaged in pair activities. The students in control group (group C) worked individually. As a pre-test, a pen-and-paper writing task was given to all the students at the beginning of the semester. During the semester, all the participants were exposed to the same materials and were taught by the same teacher for one semester. The only difference was the type of activities in which the participants were engaged. At the end of one semester, a pen-and-paper writing task was given to all the three groups. The findings of the post-test revealed that all the students could significantly improve their writing skills. Nevertheless, the students in group B significantly outperformed their counterparts. Most importantly, the results of identity analysis showed that the students in group A used authorial plural pronouns along with adjectives more frequently. The findings of this study confirmed two issues: first, the significant efficacy of prewriting activities were confirmed at the end of the semester. Second, each type of prewriting activity could affect the learners’ identity construction

Although investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style on L2 learners’ metaphorical test performance. The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase was quantitative, and the second consisted of a series of case studies using “think-aloud protocol” and “retrospection.” In the statistical phase, aimed at shedding light on the effect of the cognitive style of field (in)dependence (FI/FD) on metaphorical test performance, 80 senior undergraduates majoring in English Translation were selected through a truncated test of TOEFL adopted from Barron (2004). Metaphorical test performance was analyzed through recognition, text-based true-false, and scripturally implicit questions, refined by conducting factor analysis. Moreover, the participants’ cognitive style of FI/FD was identified via GEFT. In the qualitative part, after analyzing the verbal reports of 8 informants, the participants’ strategy preferences were examined. Results revealed the impact of the cognitive style of FI/FD and working memory on the participants’ strategy preferences. Due to the advent of learner-centered approaches, this study has some implications for L2 pedagogy discussed in the paper.