حکمرانی و ساختار؛ تأملی نظری بر ساختار حقوق اساسی در ایران (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
تحلیل ساختار حقوق اساسی در جمهوری اسلامی ایران می تواند به بازتعریف نظام حکمرانی و ظرفیت های اصلاح قانون اساسی منجر شود. این مقاله با رویکردی نهادی- هنجاری در پی نشان دادن ظرفیت های نظری نهضت قانون اساسی از سویی و ظرفیت های منطقه الفراغ از سوی دیگر برای بازبینی قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی است. این دو سرچشمه نظری می توانند با تفکیک مقبولیت و کارآمدی اجرایی از مشروعیت نظام، به افزایش دامنه اختیارات عمومی و به احیای قدرت نهاد دولت و مجلس منجر شوند. در حکمرانی ایرانی، مخدوش شدگی تقسیم کار ملی به شکل «ملوک الطوایفی دیوانی» در همه جا دامن گسترد شده و تمایز ساختاری فزاینده فضاهای اجتماعی که منجر به این تفکیک منطقی دین از برخی حوزه های سیاستی می شود، نادیده گرفته شده است. این در حالی است که مفهوم منطقه الفراغ، جهت گیری هایی کلی به سیاست های عمومی می دهد که می تواند اختیارات و وظایف را به مردم و دولت و مجلس بازگرداند بدون آنکه پای مشروعیت نظام سیاسی را به میان کشد.Governance and Structure: A Theoretical Reflection on the Structure of Constitutional Rights in Iran
Analyzing the structure of Constitutional law in the Islamic Republic of Iran can be used to identify the capacities of amending the Constitution and redefining the Iranian governance system. This article, with an institutional-normative approach, seeks to show the theoretical capacities of the constitutional movement on the one hand and the capacities of Mantaghato-laugh (Free area of Islamic regulation) on the other hand to review the Constitution of the Islamic Republic. In Iranian governance, the distortion of the national division of institutional tasks in the form of bureaucratic-tribal monarchy has been widespread in the governance structure. As such, the structural differentiation of social spaces, which leads to the logical separation of religion from public policies, has been ignored. This is while the concept of a “Free area of Islamic regulation” gives general directions to public policies that can return powers and duties to the people, to the government, and the parliament without compromising the legitimacy of the political regime. This article has several theoretical pillars that are used synthetically in connection with the main finding of the article. 1) order and power, 2) separation of powers, 3) legitimacy, 4) unity of religion and politics, and 5) constitutional orientation of public policy making. The main point of the article is that the theoretical capacities of these 5 pillars can be useful for analyzing the structure of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Constitution and revising it. First, with a normative approach, we have discussed the right to exercise power and the separation of powers (the first and second theoretical pillars). The fact that the constitution guides the operation of political societies is born from the idea that the government must protect the fundamental rights of individuals. The fundamental rights have a technical dimension that organizes the exercise of power and therefore creates limitations for the exercise of power. That is why separation of powers is considered a tool against abuse of power, prevention of tyranny, and a factor of national self-actualization, and according to Montesquieu, there will be no freedom without separation of powers. In terms of the third theoretical pillar of this article, it has been discussed that the relation of legitimacy and efficiency are closely intertwined in Iranian governance. In the Constitution, there are several principles that not only determine the direction of the policy-making systems but also lay the foundations of an interventionist government with full responsibility for the welfare of the citizens. As a result, public policies take into account the legitimacy of the political system, and in practice, the legitimacy of the political regime depends on its efficiency. This phenomenon has found an ideological facet in the shadow of the theory of Unity of religion and politics. With regards to the relationship between religion and politics in the Islamic Republic (the fourth pillar of the article), we are facing two aspects of political jurisprudence theory and legal tradition, which appear to be aligned but at the same time can be contradictory. On the one hand, legitimacy refers to the divine sovereignty over the world, and it is embodied in the Islamic Republic's Constitution. On the other hand, for some “official” theorists of the last two decades, this divine sovereignty has led to the acceptance of an approach called the theory of “discovery” and “designation”, which we call "revelation legitimacy". This revolutionist approach, in its essence, makes the legal processes of the constitution irrelevant, which means that at first, it reduces the role of experts to a passive role in the designation of Leader. The fifth pillar of the article deals with the "basic rules of public policies" and the issues of political structure related to public policies. The importance of this article is that it allows freedom of public policy-making to the citizens.
تبلیغات
