درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The occurrence of unexpected phenomena in recent decades in financial markets around the world,led to the development of theories,beyond the defined principles and criteria of classic finance.These theories are based on financial psychology and they are explaining the role of psychology in financial sciences as an influential factor and became irreplaceable in financial markets and investor decisions.One of the important theories in this field is the bounded-rationality-theory,which can explain the behavior of decision-makers about financial and economical issues based on defined theoretical frameworks and assumptions.This study developed the stock pricing model by comparing the predicted stock price based on the bounded-rationality-theory and the real stock price through collecting the data of 122 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange during the period 2011to 2019.The results of this study show the effectiveness of the bounded-rationality-theory based on the separation of stock return components and measuring the irrationality coefficient and emotional reactions of investors' decisions in stock prices.Accordingly,the limitations of investors 'ability to process information seem to affect the level of use of reasoning and rationality in decision-making and the effect of bounded-rationality through the irrationality and limited attention on stock pricing.Therefore,it is expected that knowledge about the process of bounded-rationality based on the rational-bounded of investors and the behavioral biases resulting from the irrational part of their thinking,will provide a good explanation for the process of changes in financial markets.This can provide both profit opportunities and costs in investment management so that it can be used in modeling,analysis and investment strategies.

The improved model of the Agile Kanban (i-KAM) is developed to enhance the software project monitoring task when employing Agile project management (APM) approach. The i-KAM have been initially verified by 11 knowledge and domain experts. In consequence, it has been reconstructed and enhanced based on the remarks and recommendations provided by the experts. This paper aims to present the final evaluation results of i-KAM achieved from seven software practitioners participated in a focus group. The focus group method was selected because it is an empirical approach used in the evaluation studies conducted in the software engineering (SE) domain. Therefore, this method was employed to obtain the practitioners’ feedback on the proposed model. Results confirm the effectiveness of i-KAM, in which it can assist the project managers and team members in monitoring their projects’ progress effectively. In addition, it is indicated that i-KAM is an applicable model with easy and practical implementation. This study contributes to improve the task of monitoring software development projects within the APM environment. Accordingly, this would systematically facilitate the top managements’ work, and assist in making meaningful decisions regarding to the management of projects’ workflow. Practically, case studies will be carried out in different software development organizations (SDOs) to implement i-KAM in actual projects within real environments

Organizational anomie (OA) is defined as the lack of law, as well as violations or weaknesses in the implementation of laws and norms in the organization, which can have detrimental effects on the performance of the organization and its members. The main focus of this study is to establish and validate an organizational anomie scale that can be employed to implement and operate this tool in field studies. The present research is applied-exploratory in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of method. To conduct this research, issues related to organizational anomie using factor analysis approach and content analysis method of scientific texts as well as from the perspective of qualified and experienced thinkers and experts and a researcher-made questionnaire on organizational anomie in COVID-19 pandemic are analyzed. it placed. Completed by experts and managers. The reliability coefficient of the test was calculated to be 0.85 using Cronbach's alpha test. Exploratory factor analysis of organizational questions revealed that the components of this questionnaire may explain more than 78.512 % of the desired variance. After one rotation of Varimax factors, the correlation between each item with each component was determined in the best situation and accordingly, twelve components were selected and extracted with the most weight: conflicting goals of the individual and organization, weakness in communication, standard selection ,ambiguity in goals, level of trustworthiness, negative attitude of employees towards themselves, feeling useless, understanding justice, weak control, common norms, organizational indifference, lack of socialization. According to the research findings, it can be concluded that organizational anomie is a multidimensional concept with many dimensions and components and cannot be studied with limited dimensions and components.