سید امین منصوری

EXTENDED ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The number of revealed corruption-related crimes is one of the major challenges of Iran which has been significantly increased in recent years. According to official reports, although only two cases of embezzlement were reported in 1990s and 2000s with a total value up to $ 800 million, administrative corruption has significantly increased in 2010s with 13 large corruption cases and a total value up to $ 14 billion and a growth of over 1500% compared to 1990s and 2000s (The Iranian Students News Agency[1] (ISNA), 2017). The spread of such amount of corruption in administrative and bureaucratic system of the country can have irreparable economic and social consequences. The statistic investigations have shown that macroeconomic indicators including economic growth, employment, unemployment, poverty, inflation and income distribution have become less favorable in 2010 compared to previous decades (Statistical Center of Iran, Iran Statistical Yearbook, 2017). In this regard, the following questions can be raised: is there a relationship between corruption and the indicators of income distribution and poverty in the country? Since the volume of international and unilateral sanctions on Iran has increased in the 2010s, does such a widespread growth in the volume and value of corruption cases in Iran have a relationship with sanctions?   METHODOLOGY Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of sanctions on causal relationship between corruption, income inequality and poverty in Iran during 1984 to 2020. For this purpose, the indices of per capita income, poverty line, administrative corruption and control of corruption, Atkinson and Gini have been utilized to investigate their interactions through Toda-Yamamoto Causality Test.   FINDINGS Findings of research show that:   sanctions have affected the causality of per capita income on administrative corruption. sanctions have affected the causality of corruption control on per capita income. sanctions have affected the causality of income distribution on per capita income. sanctions had no effect on causality of per capita income, on Atkinson Index and vice versa. sanctions had no effect on causality of per between poverty line, on administrative corruption and vice versa. sanctions had an effect on causality of per between poverty line, on corruption control and vice versa. sanctions had a significant positive effect on poverty line, but had no significant effect on GINI index. In other words, sanctions have affected the causality of income distribution on poverty line. sanctions had no effect on causality of poverty line, on Atkinson Index and vice versa. sanctions had no effect on causality of GINI index, on administrative corruption and vice versa. sanctions had no effect on causality of GINI index, on corruption control and vice versa. sanctions had a significant positive effect on administrative corruption, but had no significant effect on Atkinson index. In other words, sanctions have affected the causality of income distribution on administrative corruption. sanctions had a significant positive effect on Atkinson index, but had no significant effect on corruption control. In other words, sanctions have affected the causality of corruption control on income distribution.     CONCLUSION The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of sanctions on causal relationship between corruption, income inequality and poverty in Iran during1984 to 2020. For this purpose, the indices of per capita income p, poverty line, Atkinson, GINI, administrative corruption and corruption control were investigated. In general, the following results were obtained from the present study:   Income distribution is not an effective variable for poverty in Iran. Corruption is an effective variable for causality of poverty in Iran and its significance level is higher under sanctions condition. Corruption and poverty cannot properly explain the income distribution in Iran. However, the corruption control can be the cause of income distribution and poverty line is a proper representative for the cause of income distribution under sanctions conditions. Income distribution is a strong variable for causality of corruption in Iran. Poverty can properly explain the causality of corruption in Iran under sanctions condition, but is not the cause of corruption under normal condition.   According to the obtained results, it seems that sanctions condition is an effective variable for the relationship between variables of income distribution, corruption and poverty. However, the effective factors of income distribution need further investigations in future.  

EXTENDED ABSTRACTINTRODUCTION Human Development Index is a composite one to measure three criteria of longevity, access to knowledge and appropriate level of welfare. Since 2011, education, the combination of mean study years for adults (25 years of age and elder) and expected years of studying, life expectancy and income per capita have been considered as components of Human Development Index. Human Development Index is in fact the geometrical mean of these three indexes. This index is annually calculated for countries by the United Nations but not for their states, provinces, cities and regions. Therefore, researchers themselves must calculate this index for provinces for certain purposes. METHODOLOGYLack of such statistics is also a statistic deficit in Iran that has made regional and provincial researches limited and inaccurate. To remove this deficit in this research Khouzestan Human Development Indexes in the years 1996, 2006, 2011 and 2016 have been calculated using the latest formula. It needs to be mentioned that the simulation of Human Development Index is difficult and time consuming. Not paying attention to details can deviate the index. So in order to ensure the precision of calculations, the Human Development of the country has also been calculated and compared with the same index calculated by the United Nations for Iran in order to ensure the authenticity of Human Development Index in Khouzestan. The applied method was a simultaneous behavioral pattern which considers the changes in Human Development Index through components of the United Nations Human Development Index and also simultaneously predicts and includes it in Human Development Index. The estimation method is based on Stock and Watson (1993) Dynamic least squared method that is helpful for predicting variables. FINDINGSAccording to results, Khouzestan Human Development Index for the period 1990-2019 can be simulated. The related results are presented in table 1. Table 1. Simulation of Khuzestan Human Development IndexFor further investigation of the results of simulation with real data, the results of calculating simulation assessment criteria have been shown in table 2. The results verify the validity of simulation. Table 2. prediction error criteriaAs table 10 shows, Khouzestan Human Development Index had a slow rising trend up until 2005 but from 2006, there seems to be a jump or structural failure in Human Development Index. However, during 2016-2018 the trend reached a plateau and it seems to have reached its stabilized level. Also, based on this simulation Khouzestsan Human Development Index was in an average level up until 2008 but since 2009 it has reached its high. CONCLUSIONTo assess this hypothesis, in this research using the new formula Khouzestan Human Development Indexes for the years 1996, 2006, 2011 and 2016 were calculated. The results showed that the indexes of life expectancy and education in Khouzestan were in a worse situation than that of the country but the index of income (taking oil into account) was more than that of the country. The calculation of Khouzestan Human Development Index without oil showed a worse situation than that of the country.Based on results, Kouzestan Human Development Index reached from an average level in 1996 to a high level during 2006 to 2016. This is an acceptable growth. Also, Khouzestan Human Development Index without oil is lower than that of the national index and this represents the worse status of the province compared to the country.The results of simulating Human Development Index show that up until 1389, there was a slight rising trend but from this year on there has been a jump or failure. Moreover, Khouzestan Human Development Index was in an average level up to 1385 but it has reached a high one since 2010.