درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Cet article concerne l’analyse de la traduction d’un film célèbre iranien : Une séparation . Comme en Iran, ce film avait a un succès considérable en France avec près d'un million de spectateurs et a remporté presque 50 prix au niveau international. Nous allons analyser le sous-titrage pour savoir si le film est bien traduit ou non, ce qui est l’objectif de cette recherche. Pour cela, nous profitons comme méthode d’analyse, d’une branche de la traductologie cibliste, le courant fonctionnaliste et également la théorie de Skopos de Reiss et Vermeer dans lesquels on donne plus d’importance à la fonction qu’à la forme et ainsi fait-on une traduction-adaptation. Nous allons étudier les décisions que le sous-titreur a prises pour résoudre les problèmes et voir si les solutions choisies sont adéquates et si les sous-titres sont en bonne qualité. Alors en utilisant ces deux théories, nous allons, évaluer la qualité des sous-titrages français d’un film persan.

George James Frazer (1854-1941), the spiritual father of myth-ritual school, was bred up in the British tradition of empiricism. Believing in the evolutionary process of culture, Frazer mainly focused his attention on explaining such epistemic forms of thought as magic, religion and science. Accordingly, while interpreting the processes through which magic leads to religion and finally evolves into science, Frazer noticed the importance of myth and ritual and their position in this process. However, most researchers regard his reasoning in this regard as incoherent and variable. Thus, in this article, the author tries to reconsider the methodology and axioms on which Frazer relies as well as to make clear the position of myth in his anthropological system. The author believes that Frazer’s dual viewpoint about myth’s position results in no way from the attributed incoherency of his thoughts, but in fact his contemplations on intermediate levels, which make possible going from one stage to the other, provides him with an adequate explanation of the position of myth and its relation to ritual. In the end, it is revealed that Frazer thinks of myth as posterior to ritual in the first intermediate level, while prior to ritual in the second intermediate level. Accordingly, analyzing the validity of Frazer’s reasoning as well as his methodological and epistemic viewpoints, the author has put forth a couple of critical suggestion

In this article, the story of Sin , by Jalal Al-e Ahmad, is analytically criticized in a two-sided comprehensive view. Literature is a link between art and thought, and an important part of the ideas visualized in literary texts are social. The story, and especially the short story, is an appropriate genre for expressing the writers' thoughts and thus it is a distinguished context for sociological-literary interdisciplinary research. Generally, the criticism of these works is one-dimensional and one-sided, and usually either literary is examined regardless of the social context, or the former is overlooked at the cost of the latter. Jalal Al-e Ahmad on the one hand, due to his excellent writing and literary skills, and on the other hand, because of the precision, sensitivity, and specificity to social issues, has a special place among the short story writers. In the Sin story of the Se Tar collection, describing the narrator-hero inner characteristics, he has depicted the social conflict and, consequently, the anti-normalization. Gender discrimination, misbeliefs, ignorance of the truth of religion, and, as a result, hypocrisy, and weakness of religiousness, routine life, and stagnation of society are other features depicted in this story.