درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

SUBJECT AND OBJECTIVES : The issue of economy, occupation and livelihood is one of the most primitive and urgent issues that always accompany human life and form a major part of his life. The economic system governing the family should be such that it can overcome the existing problems and obstacles as the human life advances in any era. METHOD AND FINDING : In this regard, the study of family economy and the methods of its management, the explanation of the economic fundamentals of family and the role of each member in its management are of particular importance. It is necessary to identify the correct pattern of consumption in the family and to explain successful strategies in the family economic management. each family member with their good tactfulness has a strong role in managing the family economy. Meanwhile, women’s role is more than others considering their position and responsibility. Identifying the costs and managing the income at home brings about the right consumption and optimal usage of the facilities, resulting in balance, the salvation of problems, the reduction of anxiety and worries, and the governance of peace and tranquility on the family atmosphere. CONCLUSION : Simplicity and avoidance of formalities, creation of love and intimacy, reduction of wastefulness, creation of a spirit of patience and endurance and attention to the poor are the effects of the correct economy in the family. According to this research, the how of household economy management has become clear, in the light of which the existing economic problems in the families can be partly overcome.

According to a widely held view in the philosophy of mind, property dualism is a respectable theory whereas substance dualism need not be taken seriously. This paper argues that property dualism, as it is usually understood, is incoherent. The commitments that are meant to lead to property dualism actually lead to substance dualism. The argument presented here adds weight to David Chalmers’ suggestion that the serious nonphysicalist options are in fact various kinds of panpsychism and substance dualism. Along the way, I offer an account of the substance/property distinction, argue against the existence of substrata as distinct from substances and properties, and describe a new position that I call ‘transcendent panpsychism’. I identify some reasons why philosophers of mind might have overlooked the incoherence of property dualism and finish with some thoughts on the significance of my conclusion for developmental psychology.