درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Task difficulty across different macro-genres continues to remain among less attended areas in second language development studies. This study examined the correlation between task difficulty across the descriptive, narrative, argumentative, and expository macro-genres. The three components of task difficulty (i.e., code complexity, cognitive complexity, and communicative stress) were also compared in the four macro-genres. The design included the administration of short reading texts with comparable length and readability indices based on the four macro-genres followed by task difficulty questionnaire. The macro-genre-based reading textsalong with the task difficulty questionnaire were administered to 50 EFL students in the University ofLorestan, Iran. Task difficulty questionnaire explored the learners’ perceptions of task difficulty in the code complexity, cognitive complexity, and communicative stress domains. The results revealed that there were no significant differences among the task difficulty components in the four macro-genre-based text types. The findings also showed that there was no significant correlation between task difficulty of each macro-genre with those of the other genres except thoseofthe narrative and expository genres.The findings hold implications for the use of macro-genres with different task difficulty indices in task-oriented programs, teacher training, and testing.

این مطالعه تأثیر انواع مختلف ارائه معنای لغات را به صورت چندرسانه ای (متنی، تصویری و ویدئویی) از طریق بردهای هوشمند بر درک مطلب دانش آموزان ایرانی مورد بررسی قرار می دهد. از بین 102 نفر جمعیت کلی زبان آموزان دختر، 60 نفر بر اساس آزمون استاندارد نلسون انتخاب شدند. سپس آنها به صورت تصادفی به 4 گروه 15 نفره تقسیم شدند که عبارتند از: سه گروه آزمایش که از ارائه معنای لغات بهره می بردند و یک گروه کنترل. بر اساس نتایج مطالعه آزمایشی، بعضی از لغات متون کامپیوتری، به وسیله یک برنامه نرم افزار کامپیوتری، دارای چند لینک شدند که از طریق این لینک ها معنای آن ها به روش های مختلف (متنی، تصویری و ویدئویی) از طریق برد هوشمند ارائه می شد. وقتی معلم در حین تدریس لغت لینک دار روی برد هوشمند را لمس می کرد یک صفحه جدید ظاهر می شد. این صفحه یا لغت را با معنی آن به صورت متنی (برای گروهی که معنای لغات را فقط به صورت متنی دریافت می کردند), یا با تصویر آن (برای گروهی که معنای لغات را فقط به صورت تصویری دریافت می کردند) و یا با ویدئو ( برای گروهی که معنای لغات را از طریق فیلم و انیمیشن دریافت می کردند) نمایش می داد. هر گروه از زبان آموزان، متن های کامپیوتری را از طریق اینترنت برد هوشمند در کلاس درس بر اساس یکی از روش های فوق می خواندند. نتایج آماری داده های به دست آمده نشان داد که 1) هر سه گروه آزمایش که از ارائه معنای لغات با استفاده از برد هوشمند بهره می بردند (متنی، تصویری و ویدئویی) نسبت به گروه کنترل که از ارائه معنای لغات توسط برد هوشمند هیچ بهره ای نمی بردند، متون زبان انگلیسی را به صورت قابل توجهی بهتر درک می کردند.2) گروهی که معنای لغات را به صورت فیلم ویدئویی و انیمیشن توسط برد هوشمند دریافت می کردند در درک مطلب نسبت به گروه هایی که معنای لغات را فقط به صورت متنی یا فقط به صورت تصویری توسط برد هوشمند دریافت می کردند عملکرد بهتری داشتند؛ اما به صورت معنادار نبود. و در آخر هیچ تفاوت معناداری بین سه گروه آزمایش در درک و دریافت زبان آموزان از متون زبان انگلیسی از طریق برد هوشمند وجود نداشت.

Academic writing ability is an important goal that learners of English as a Second Language (ESL) or English as a Foreign Language (EFL) try to attain. While ESL students’ academic writings have been widely explored, owing to few studies investigating appraisal resources in EFL students’ argumentative writing, the gap still exists about EFL students’ academic writing. This study aimed to see how Kurdish-speaking learners of English employ appraisal resources in their writings. It further aimed to explore whether the appraisal framework can be utilized as an assessment scale for evaluating the students’ argumentative writing. To this end, the study investigated the argumentative essays written by 15 bilingual Kurdish-Iranian graduates of English within the framework of the appraisal theory. The instruments applied in this study consisted of a modified rating scale for assessing the essays in terms of the macrostructures exploited in them and the framework for the analysis of appraisal resources. Quantitative findings revealed high-graded essays employ more attitudinal items and fewer monoglossic resources than low-graded ones. Qualitatively, the high-graded essays articulated attitudinal values in nominal forms and sometimes in a backgrounded manner while these values were mostly presented by surge of feelings and in a foregrounded way in the low-graded essays. Regarding engagement, unlike the high-graded essays, the low-graded ones were poor in recognizing other voices and alternative positions. Inspired by the strength of the appraisal model evaluating writing, results suggest that high-graded essays are successful in positioning readers attitudinally and clarifying the ethical message to readers.

A large number of studies dealing with phonology have focused their attention on phonological production at the expense of phonological perception which provides the foundation stone for phonological production. This study focuses on phonological perception at phonemic level. The purpose of the study is helping beginning learners improve their perception of the English phonemes which are confusable for them. To this end, we propose transcribing as an aural input enhancement device and examine its effect on learners’ phonemic perception. Thirty one females who were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups participated in this study. The experimental group had transcribing exercise during the experiment while the control group did not. The results of the study show that transcribing improves beginning learners’ phonemic perception significantly. Therefore, EFL teachers are advised to include transcribing exercise as one of the techniques to improve learners’ phonemic perception and, hence, their listening comprehension.

This research aimed to screen 'essay writing' difficulties that non-native university students at postgraduate levels usually experience regarding scholarly publication in mainstream, English journals. Two sets of variables including written literacy competencies in Persian and English languages were mapped over language uses (General vs. Academic). Initial screenings from one hundred Iranian students at PhD and MA levels with publication experiences in both Persian and English languages gave rise to some fifty-five participants randomly selected from different university disciplines (Humanities, Engineering, Medicine and Basic Sciences) and diverse university settings (Public and Private) across the country and classified via stratified sampling. A validated questionnaire from a large-scale project called ENEIDA (Moreno, 2011) was used for collecting the required data. Two measures were used to assess written literacy competencies across language uses: 1) participants' assumed, self-reported written literacy competencies in using English and Persian languages for General and Academic purposes were denoted as 'perceived' measures and 2) further supported by actual measures: mostly received comments from reviewers in the mainstream, English journals by the target group above. Findings were discussed in the light of recent lines of enquiries in Academic Literacy (AL) trends.

The sociocultural approach to writing strategy use emphasizes the importance of context and the mediating resources that learners can use to enhance the quality of their performance in writing (Lei, 2008). Accordingly, the present study explored the sociocultural strategy use of a convenient sample of 105 BA level students of English Language and Literature who had passed essay-writing courses in a state university in Iran by analyzing their responses to the items of a newly-developed sociocultural strategy use questionnaire consisting of different sub-scales, namely, artifact-mediated, rule-mediated, community-mediated and role-mediated strategies. The results of the descriptive statistics revealed that the tool-mediated strategies, which are the subcategory of artifact-mediated strategies, had the highest frequency of use which is rather justified in the context of Iran. In addition, the students’ overall strategy use and their writing ability were correlated and a statistically significant relationship was found between these two variables. However, the results of the multiple regression analysis indicated that none of the sub-scales had a unique predicting power in accounting for the learners’ writing ability. The researchers also compared the sociocultural strategy use of more- and less-skilled student writers and found a significant difference in the strategy use of different individuals.

هدف از تحقیق حاضر مقایسه فراوانی وقوع بخشهای متوجه به شکل زبان در مکالمات گروه های دو نفره متشابه و نا متشابه بود. این مطالعه با شرکت شصت نفر از دانشجویان رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی که بر اساس نمراتشان در یک آزمون بسندگی استاندارد به دو گروه تقسیم شدند صورت گرفت. در یگ گروه، گروه های دونفره متشابه و در گروه دیگر گروه های دونفره نامتشابه تشکیل شدند. زبان آموزان در هر دو گروه مکالماتی در طی نه فعالیت نوشتاری مشارکتی انجام دادند که مکالمات ضبط و نگشاته شدند. میزان فراوانی وقوع بخشهای متوجه به شکل زبان، در مکالمات ضبط شده از گروه ها، شمارش و با روش آماری آزمون تی گروه های مستقل مقایسه گردید. نتایج تحلیل های آماری نشان دادند که گروه های دونفره نا متشابه، در مکالمات خود، بطور قابل توجه و معنی داری، از بخشهای متوجه به شکل زبان بیشتری استفاده کرده بودند. نتایج بدست آمده با توجه به نظریه اجنماعی فرهنگی ویگوتسکی مورد بحث قرار گرفته و نهایتا فواید آموزشی متعددی بدست آمد.

Although investigating the factors that influence test scores is important, a majority of stakeholders show a paucity of attention towards individual learner differences due to having large classes of L2 learners. This study sought to explore the possible effect of working memory and cognitive style on L2 learners’ metaphorical test performance. The study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase was quantitative, and the second consisted of a series of case studies using “think-aloud protocol” and “retrospection.” In the statistical phase, aimed at shedding light on the effect of the cognitive style of field (in)dependence (FI/FD) on metaphorical test performance, 80 senior undergraduates majoring in English Translation were selected through a truncated test of TOEFL adopted from Barron (2004). Metaphorical test performance was analyzed through recognition, text-based true-false, and scripturally implicit questions, refined by conducting factor analysis. Moreover, the participants’ cognitive style of FI/FD was identified via GEFT. In the qualitative part, after analyzing the verbal reports of 8 informants, the participants’ strategy preferences were examined. Results revealed the impact of the cognitive style of FI/FD and working memory on the participants’ strategy preferences. Due to the advent of learner-centered approaches, this study has some implications for L2 pedagogy discussed in the paper.