مطالب

James Bellamy is one of the contemporary Orientalists in Quranic studies who, considering the Qur'an as a historical text, attempts to recognize some problematic Quranic phrases and suggests their corrections by using the textual criticism method. Analyzing the textual difficulties of the Qur'an, he points out that the Holy Prophet did not cause these errors, but based on some traditions, he believes that the scribes of revelation made mistakes while copying the text of the Qur'an. Referring to twelve of these mistakes, he tries to indicate that the scribes might have made mistakes in every period, and by exemplifying such cases, he proposes their corrections. This article intends to critically analyze the first six proposed corrections of James Bellamy's article entitled "Some Proposed Emendations to the Text of the Koran" published in 1993. A serious critique of Bellamy's view is the neglect of frequency in the written quotation of the Quranic text and the dominance of reading over writing. Furthermore, many of his inscriptional claims are inconsistent with ancient manuscripts of the Qur'an dating back to the early centuries of Islam.

Introduction: Audit quality is one of the most important issues in the field of auditing and capital market. In order to know the factors that determine the audit quality, the conducted researches confirm that compliance with ethics by auditors is one of the important and influencing variables on audit quality. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between auditors' ethical disengagement and audit quality. Material & Methods: According to its nature, the present research is applied research, and in terms of method, it is among descriptive-correlational research. Its statistical population consists of auditors working in audit institutions, and 185 people have been selected among them as an in access sample. The data collection tool is a questionnaire. The collected data were summarized by Excel software and analyzed using SPSS software through multivariate regression. Results: The results of this research show that there is moral disengagement among auditors and it has a significant and negative relationship with the auditor's understanding of audit quality. In other words, with the increase of moral disengagement in the auditors, the audit quality also decreases. Conclusion: Audit quality is affected by factors and behavioral characteristics, including auditor's moral disengagement. The rule of ethics in the auditing profession can strengthen individual ethics in auditors, and this ultimately increases the quality of auditing.