درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Prior research demonstrates that flipped approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom positively affects learners' achievement. However, the way learners with distinct cognitive styles respond to this method remains less unexplored. This study examines the effect of flipped classroom instruction on grammar learning of Iranian EFL beginners at Iran Language Institute in Tabriz, Iran with different cognitive styles, i.e., field dependent (FD), field independent (FI), and field neutral (FN). A convenience sample of two groups in five classes taught by the same teacher were given a Group Embedded Figures Test to identify their cognitive styles, and a Grammar pre-test and posttest to measure their grammar achievement. Learners in the flipped classes watched videoed lessons of grammar via an application prior to each session. Inside the class, they briefly reviewed the videos and were engaged in interactive activities. Learners in the control group were taught grammar based on their regular syllabus which involved strings of instruction, practice and homework assignment. A two-way ANCOVA revealed that FI learners in flipped classes outperformed their non-flipped counterparts, while FD learners in non-flipped classes performed better compared to FI learners, demonstrating an interaction between cognitive style and the type of instruction. Learners identified as FN performed moderately well in both settings. Overall, flipped classroom led to better grammar achievement. The findings attest to the dynamicity involved in the functioning of flipped instruction. It is suggested that pedagogical variations, individual characteristics, and grammar assessment procedures be taken into account in designing and implementing flipped classrooms. 

This study examines hybridity in translation through a case study of Funny in Farsi: A Memoir of Growing Up Iranian in America . It analyzes how references to American and Iranian cultures are rendered in the Persian translation and how these choices shape the hybrid character of the text for different readerships. To this end, the English source text and its Persian translation are compared to identify the translation strategies applied to hybrid elements reflecting Iranian and American cultures. The findings show that material culture, such as food, clothing, housing, and transportation, constitutes the most prominent category of hybrid elements. Transference is the most frequently used strategy overall, particularly for elements reflecing American culture, indicating a predominantly foreignizing approach. In contrast, hybrid items reflecing Iranian culture are more often translated through cultural equivalence and reduction. Interpreted in light of Venuti’s (1995) concepts of domestication and foreignization, the results suggest that the translator preserves the hybrid nature of the memoir by maintaining the foreignness of American elements while reducing familiar Iranian ones.

This study explores the influence of dialogic reflective journals (DRJ), incorporated with guided collaborative critical reflection (GCCR), on critical thinking skills and professional identity development of Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers, framed by Schön's (1983) Reflective Practice Model and Korthagen's (2004) Onion Model. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research involved 60 EFL teachers (30 in the experimental group and 30 in the control group) over a semester. Quantitative data from pre- and post-intervention surveys were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests, while qualitative insights were derived from thematic analysis of DRJ entries and focus group interviews. Findings indicated significant enhancements in critical thinking and professional identity for the experimental group, with emergent themes of Ethical Mission Alignment, Collaborative Agency, Emotional Resilience, and Socio-Cultural Awareness extending Korthagen's model. These results underscore DRJ's efficacy in promoting transformative reflection, offering implications for EFL teacher training programs in Iran to mitigate barriers like workload and institutional rigidity.

The present study aims to investigate users’ responses to linguistic diversity on Persian-language social media, particularly Instagram, based on Lippi-Green’s theoretical framework of language subordination. The study employs a mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, the data were analyzed using the language subordination framework, which comprises seven core components: Mystification, authority, misinformation, trivialization, accommodators and non-accommodators, threat, and promise. In the quantitative phase, the frequency and proportional distribution of these components were calculated across more than 400 user comments posted on widely followed Persian-language Instagram pages between 2023 and 2026. The findings indicate that the components of misinformation and trivialization occurred most frequently and that social media platforms, contrary to common assumptions, serve as significant sites for reproducing the ideology of the standard language and marginalizing non-standard varieties. Furthermore, the results show that users’ linguistic judgments are largely influenced by entrenched monolingual standard ideologies that, consciously or unconsciously, construct the so-called Persian standard as superior while other language varieties as inferior.

Although peer-assisted collaborative writing has been examined extensively, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) highlights the importance of investigating how AI might affect the way students write and perceive writing. Drawing on the sociocultural theory, the present mixed-methods study examined learners’ integration of AI in their writing process. The participants included 40 TEFL students, randomly assigned to either the peer-assisted collaborative writing or AI-assisted collaborative writing groups. In the first phase of the study, a pretest and a posttest were administered to both groups. They were analyzed in terms of different measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency features (CAF). A series of paired and independent t-tests was used to compare the two groups in each measure. Although there was no difference between the groups in terms of complexity and fluency, learners in the peer-assisted group outperformed those in the AI-assisted group in terms of accuracy measures. In the second phase of the study, the participants in both groups filled in an open-ended questionnaire on their attitudes toward their writing experiences. It was found that learners in the peer-scaffolded group were more satisfied with their writing and experienced less boredom during writing.