مجتبی محمدی

With the incremental integration of technology in writing assessment, technology-generated feedback has found its way to take further steps toward replacing human correcting and rating. Yet, further investigation is deemed necessary regarding its potential use either as a supplement to or replacement for human feedback. This embedded mixed-method research aims to investigate three groups of Iranian intermediate IELTS applicants who received automated, teacher, and blended (automated + teacher) feedback modes on different aspects of writing when practicing for the writing skill of IELTS. Furthermore, a structured written interview was conducted to explore learners’ perception (attitude, clarity, preference) of the mode of feedback they received. Findings revealed that students who received teacher-only and blended feedback performed better in writing. Also, the blended feedback group outperformed the others regarding task response, the teacher feedback group in cohesion and coherence, and the automated feedback group in lexical resource. The analysis of the interviews revealed that learners had high opinion regarding the clarity of all feedback modes and learners’ attitude about feedback modes were positive. However, they highly preferred the blended one. The findings suggest new ideas that can facilitate learning and assessing writing and recommend that teachers provide comprehensive, accurate, and continuous feedback as a means of formative assessment.

This study, contrary to the conventional research on PCK, which attempted to enhance the teachers’ PCK and single out its driving factors, aims to use PCK as an outcome-based lens for evaluating Iranian EFL teachers’ programs. To this end, two current EFL teacher-education programs (i.e., State and Islamic Azad universities on the one hand and Farhnagian Teacher Education University on the other), each with its specific approach to developing EFL teachers’ PCK, were selected. Along with administering a glocally developed and validated PCK questionnaire among 263 student-teachers, this study ran a one-on-one semi-structured interview with 80 student-teachers to capture a crystal-clear evaluation of the outcomes the programs were to cultivate. The results of running qualitative and MANOVA analysis methods showed the student-teachers trained in the program with a more finely-tuned PCK instruction, which was accompanied by four continuous courses of teaching internship, were more cognizant of the role of PCK in their professional development and enjoyed a statistically significant index of developed PCK. Although there existed some similarities between these programs in terms of reviewing high school English course books, evaluation and assessment, and applying technology in teaching English, student-teachers in both programs were not completely aware of different components of PCK, including curriculum design and materials development, language teachers’ technological knowledge, and professional development. The results imply that content knowledge, PCK, and internship should be fettered together. The findings suggest that EFL teachers’ PCK can be applied as an effective lens for delving deeply into teacher training programs.