درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

As the main part of a large-scale project, the present study investigated the relationship among reflective thinking, listening anxiety, and listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners with regard to their proficiency level. To this end, 223 (106 intermediate and 117 advanced) adult male and female Iranian EFL learners from a private language institute took part in the study by completing the Reflective Thinking Questionnaire (RTQ) developed by Kember et al., (2000), the Foreign Language Listening Anxiety Scale (FLLAS) developed by Kim (2000) and a listening comprehension test selected from the listening part of IELTS. Using factor analysis and Chronbach’s Alpha, the questionnaires were revalidated and their reliability was re-estimated. The results of Pearson product moment correlations indicated there was a statistically significant: (a) positive association between reflective thinking and listening comprehension, (b) reverse correlation between listening anxiety and listening comprehension, and (c) reverse relationship between reflective thinking and listening anxiety of Iranian EFL learners. Furthermore, the results of multiple regression analysis indicated listening anxiety, compared to reflective thinking, was a significantly stronger predictor of listening comprehension. Additionally, the results of MANOVA revealed there was a significant difference between intermediate and advanced EFL learners with respect to their reflective thinking and listening anxiety. In the light of the findings of the study, foreign language education policy makers in general and EFL teachers in particular are thus recommended to introduce ways to enhance reflective thinking of the students and decrease their listening anxiety if they are to improve their listening comprehension. The results and implications of the study are discussed in more detail in the paper.

امروزه٬ هم راستا با گرایش های آموزش زبان که به دنبال نهادینه کردن فعالیت های آموزشی و آزمون سازی دانشجو محور هستند٬ پذیرش بیشتری در مورد تفاوت های فردی و هوش های چندگانه دانشجویان وجود دارد. همچنین٬ اتکا به نفس یکی از عوامل تعیین کننده موفقیت افراد تقریبا در هر بافتی می باشد. با فرض اینکه نمایه های هوش های چندگانه در تعامل با اتکا به نفس معلم ها به صورت مشترک ممکن است میزان بهره وری و کارآیی آموزشی معلمان را شکل دهند٬ این مطالعه به بررسی رابطه بین هوش های چندگانه دانشجو-معلم های زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی و اتکا به نفس آنها پرداخته است. در این راستا، سی و پنج دانشجو-معلم زن و مرد زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی در موسسات خصوصی زبان ارومیه پرسشنامه های هوش های چندگانه مک کنزی (1999) و مقیاس اتکا به نفس معلمان (چانن-موران و ولفلک-هوی٬ 2001) را تکمیل کردند. در مجموع رابطه قوی مثبتی بین هوش های چندگانه و اتکا به نفس دانشجو-معلمان زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارج حاصل شد. مقدار مجذور آر (R Square)در تحلیل رگراسیون نشان داد هوش های چندگانه اتکا به نفس معلمان را تعیین می کند و هوش درون-فردی در تعیین اتکا به نفس این معلمان نقش محوری دارد. بعلاوه بر اساس نتایج این پژوهش، بیشترین و محبوب ترین توانایی٬ هوش های درون-فردی و وجودی بودند. در مورد زیرمجموعه های اتکا به نفس٬ دانشجو-معلمان نشان دادند که در مقوله های مشارکت دانشجو و راهبردهای آموزشی اتکا به نفس بیشتری دارند. بر اساس این مطالعه پیشنهاد می شود که برنامه های آموزشی هوش های چندگانه برای معلمان تهیه و تدوین گردد و از این اصول در جهت تقویت و ارتقای کیفیت ارائه مواد درسی توسط معلمان بهره گرفته شود.

In response to the increasing interest in and need for a practical brief measure in language testing, this study explored the properties of an offline short-form test (OSF) versus a conventional lengthy test. From the total of 98 vocabulary items pooled from the Iranian National University Entrance Exams, 60 items were selected for the conventional test (CT). To build the OSF, we created an item bank by examining the item response theory (IRT) parameter estimates. Data for the IRT calibration included the responses of 774,258 examinees. Upon the results of the item calibration, 43 items with the highest discrimination power and minimal guessing values from different levels of ability were selected for the item bank. Then, using the responses of 253 EFL learners, we compared the measurement properties of the OSF scores with those of the CT scores in terms of the score precision, score comparability, and consistency of classification decisions. The results revealed that although the OSF generally did not achieve the same level of measurement precision as the CT, it still achieved a desired level of precision while lessening the negative effects of a lengthy test. The results also signified an excellent degree of correspondence between OSF and CT scores and classification results. In all, findings suggest that OSF can stand as a reasonable alternative for a longer test, especially when conditions dictate that a very short test be used.

Alternative assessment approaches received considerable attention soon after a discontent with traditional, one-shot testing. These approaches, however, have been used only to improve learners’ linguistic ability despite communicative models of language which pointed that knowledge of language also involves pragmatic ability (Bachman, 1990; Bachman & Palmer, 1996). The present study tries to explore the effect of two alternative assessment approaches (self-assessment and conference) on students’ production of four speech acts (apology, complaint, request, and refusal) plus politeness markers. A sample of 64 EFL students participated in this study. Metapragmatic explanations were given to three groups of university students studying English as a foreign language. The two treatment groups received instruction through self-assessment and conference and a comparison group was exposed to the conventional one-shot testing. The results of the One-Way ANOVA conducted after the treatment revealed an outperformance of alternative assessment approaches to the conventional one in the production of the four speech acts and politeness markers in WDCTs. A qualitative analysis of students’ self-ratings in the self-assessment group revealed that they focused more on linguistic criteria during the initial sessions and on pragmatic ones by the end of the treatment. It can be concluded that alternative assessment approaches are beneficial to students’ production of speech acts and politeness markers. In the end, the applicability and the positive effect of alternative approaches in pragmatic assessment are emphasized.