رامین اکبری

طی سالهای اخیر، معلمین به عنوان یکی از مهمترین عوامل در تعلیم و تربیت بیش از پیش مورد توجه محققین قرار گرفته­اند. در این راستا، تلاشهای زیادی جهت یافتن روابط بین متغیرهای مختلف معلمان (از جمله کارآمدی، تحلیل­رفتگی شغلی، سبک تدریس و هوش هیجانی) و ویژگیهای جمعیت شناختی آنان (نظیر جنسیت، میزان تحصیلات، و سابقه تدریس) در رشته­های وابسته به تعلیم و تربیت صورت گرفته است. با این وجود، فقدان چنین تحقیقاتی در رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی محسوس می باشد. هدف از تحقیق حاضر، یافتن روابط میان برخی از این متغیرها در بین معلمان زبان انگلیسی ایرانی بود. بدین منظور، 264 معلم زبان انگلیسی به چهار پرسشنامه کارآمدی، تحلیل­رفتگی شغلی، سبک تدریس، و هوش هیجانی پاسخ دادند. نتایج تحلیل داده­های جمع­آوری شده حاکی از وجود همبستگی معنا دار در بین برخی از اجزا این چهار متغیر از یکسو و اختلاف معنا دار در بین بعضی از این اجزا بر اساس جنسیت، میزان تحصیلات، و سابقه تدریس افراد شرکت­کننده در تحقیق بود.

هدف از مقاله حاضر بررسی توانش شناختی مدرسین متخصّص زبان انگلیسی می باشد که برای نخستین بار به عنوان بخشی از جدیدترین مدل تحت پژوهش راجع به تعریف تخصّص در آموزش زبان انگلیسی در حیطه زبان شناسی کاربردی مطرح است. بدین منظور، تحقیقات پیشین در این زمینه مطالعه گردید که ماحصل آن استخراج ده تم شناختی بود که سپس از طریق مصاحبه هایی که با صاحب نظرانِ این رشته انجام گرفت مورد بررسی بیشتر واقع شد. مصاحبه شونده ها شامل اساتید دانشگاه در رشته زبان انگلیسی، تعلیم دهندگان معلمین زبان و نیز مدرّسین برجسته زبان انگلیسی در ایران بودند. ده تم استخراج شده مورد تأیید ایشان واقع شد که در نهایت شامل موارد ذیل هستند: سرعت در شناخت الگوها، توجه گزینشی، دیدگاه کلی نگر، حافظه برتر، سرعت در کدگزاری اطلاعات، قدرت پیش بینی، نگرش به نقش معلم، آگاهی از موقعیت-محور بودن رویدادهای کلاسی، آگاهی از سطح دانش، و برقراری ارتباط بین دانش پیشین و دانش جدید. در این مقاله هر یک از تم ها به همراه گزیده ای از سابقه تحقیقات پیشین و توصیفاتی از نظرات مصاحبه شوندگان به تفصیل آمده است. هم چنین بر این نکته تاکید شده است که ویژگی های شناختی مدرسین متخصّص تنها یک بعد از چند بعد مدل توصیفی تخصّص در آموزش زبان انگلیسی می باشد که در یک رساله تکمیلی دوره دکتری تخصّصی این رشته در حال تدوین می باشد.

The significance of research article (RA) abstract as a key academic genre has recently motivated analysts to focus on this neglected area. Considering a summary function for abstracts, most genre researchers have adopted the conventionally proposed Introduction- Method- Results- Discussion (or Conclusion) (IMRD) model for analysis. However, the problems reported, especially for Results and Discussion sections, question the vitality of such accounts and prompt further scrutiny. Moreover, in spite of claims about disciplinary and cultural variations which can affect communication within and across discourse communities, sufficient contrastive studies which address the Iranian academics' need to communicate with and participate efficiently in the international discourse communities are scarce. Inspired by English for Specific/Academic Purposes tradition of genre analysis, this paper tries to fill these gaps presenting a comparative generic analysis of soft sciences abstracts to see what the characterizing features of the texts of Iranian scholars and their international peers are. The macro-structure, micro-structure, and some features of 100 experimental RA abstracts taken from a number of reputable Iranian (Persian) and international (English) journals were analyzed and explained drawing upon some existing rigorous models. The results revealed similarities in the presence of Introduction, Method, and concluding units, while there were also differences in the realization of units, Moves, and Steps. It is argued that the differences can point to the varying cultural norms and values of the two groups. Plus, considering the inadequacy of the four-way macro-model, an alternative three-way model was suggested, instead. Some implications of the study are discussed, too

Teacher education is deemed to play a critical role in revolutionizing any education system. As a result, pre-service teacher education has received considerable attention in education systems world over. In the context of Iran, the process of teacher education has not been properly implemented and following their being recruited teachers would go directly to classes, without possessing adequate professional competencies. Hence, the present study intends to provide a comparative account of EFL pre-service teacher education in Iran and five other countries attempting to address applicable issues, criticisms, and constructive lessons to be learned from the relevant experiences of such countries. To this end, the study examines recruitment requiremnets, EFL teacher professional preparation and evaluation, and teaching practice in the Iranian context and those of other countries.In so doing, this study analyzed the existing documents and reports published by international and governmental organizations and previous research done relevant to the countries included in the study. The results indicated that almost all the five countries bear some resemblance to one another in pre-service teacher recruitment requirements. Iran and Japan, however, seem to have a more sensitive stance on teachers and conducting interviews with candidates than other countries.  Moreover, Germany and the U.S. appear to have built up a more sophisticated teacher education system compared to other countries. The results further revealed that the TEP program in Iran has made arrangements to keep up with the new trends in teacher education and has partly been successful in following in developed countries’ footsteps.

A rich research base suggests that high-stakes tests reforms serve as vehicles for promoting quality of learning, standards of teaching, and credible forms of accountability. Iran’s last decade policies to reform its University Entrance Examinations (UEEs) heralded such a case. What sparked off this reform was the long-lasting pernicious impact of the UEEs on curriculum, instruction, learning, and on societal values and access to the upward social mobility. However, attempts to introduce intended changes are often not as effective as their planners hoped. A scrutiny of change ‘antecedent conditions’ as well as its initial ‘process of diffusion’ i.e., a ‘baseline study’ will ameliorate such a failure (Weir & Roberts, 1994, Fekete et al, 1999). Assessing the feasibility of the UEEs reform through such a ‘baseline study’ is a gap in Iran’s reform initiatives. As such, the authors applied Henrichsen’s (1989) Hybrid Diffusion Model (HDM), underscoring an awareness of and a need for evaluation of any changed program from a multiplex of factors, as its theoretical framework to critically evaluate the reformed program. The paper thus first presents the policy deliberations and steering National Documents that pushed through an assessment-led reform in Iran’s education. Then it sketches a detailed discussion of the contextual policies and practices of the long-lasting UEEs program, its alternative and associated stakes. While the results highlight key political dynamics which drove national policymaking, they are suggestive of the challenges, controversies, and risks that thwart the success rate of ideals intended by the underpinning policies.