درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Today, there is a growing trend towards qualitative research in different areas of academic investigations. However, students face difficulties in deciding on qualitative methods of research, because most of the literature on qualitative research focuses on the philosophical and theoretical aspects, and they hardly offer any practical guidelines. This problem is rooted in the essence of qualitative research, which makes the details of the research process unachievable at the beginning. As a result, the features of the sampling plan—like the accurate size and form of the sampling—remain uncertain until after the data has been gathered, and this makes the jury doubtful about the approval of the research proposal. Hence, framing an appropriate and assayable plan for sampling can be of great help in the approval and execution of qualitative research plans. From this perspective, the present article aims to design a framework for a sampling plan in qualitative researches using theoretical sources of the grounded theory method and researchers’ suggestions based on practical involvement, as well as the recent experience of the authors in grounded theory research. By studying these sources, and considering the feedback for and practical involvement in the grounded theory method, a two-stage plan of sampling is proposed. The initial stage aims to ensure adequate diversity for the appropriate distribution of the samples, and the second, as a theoretical sampling stage, guarantees the theoretical attribute of sampling in qualitative research.

The conclusion of any contract aims at implementation of the obligations arising from it. Morality dictates that people adhere to what they assumed regarding others. The law also supported the moral judgment and in case of breach of obligations to oblige, compensation as a sanction is imposed on obligor. In view of the economic analysis, he also committed to respect his contract and the Contract shall be performed contrary to the intention of breaching party, and on both sides the effectiveness is motivated to build trust and to maximize contract efficiency. Typically there are two basic solutions in compensation for breach of contract. First, the obligation of obligator to perform obligation, secondly, payment of damages for non-performance, either by the parties in the form of penalty clause or by the court to refer the matter to the expert identified and they are required to pay it. In choosing one of these, economic perspective considers the economic benefits of each of these two solutions. If so economic benefit in cases where subjective commitment and intellectual damage on the implementation of the commitment, as compensation for these losses not compensated correctly, and basically cannot be estimated. In second view, sentence in view of the compensation usually refers to material damages or economic damages, in such cases compensation for losses caused to the obligee can be compensated better and more efficient method is considered. Finally, it must be borne in mind that the purpose of signing the contract because is its implementation and in cases where the performance of contractual obligations under changed circumstances faced hardships, the elimination of obstacles to the implementation of the contract will be resolved, it seems to modify the contract as a mechanism for the implementation of the contract must be considered unless they agreed to be imposed on them by law or judicial authority. In this case, unless the modification is done by mutual consent, it is modification by legal and judicial means economically, we'll see how the parties to the agreement have wanted to do risk allocation or choose the more efficient ones, that is, which party can a lower cost can bear the risk of changing circumstances and consider same party responsible for it.