محمدرضا قائدی

The primary issue of this research was to investigate the relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and user behavior patterns on social networks, the impact of AI on voting behavior, and the connection between the use of online data analysis and students' decision-making in presidential elections. This question arises while considering the influence of AI on user behavior patterns and decision-making in presidential elections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of AI variables and online data on user behavior and decision-making in various contexts. This re-search examined the study hypothesis to better understand how behavior and decision-making are shaped in the digital age and the role of modern technologies in these processes. To conduct this research, a survey method and available library resources were utilized. The study used existing sources and collected necessary data from the target population, namely students at universities in Tehran, and employed descriptive and inferential statistics for data analysis. The findings of this research indicate that demographic variables and AI play a significant role in user behavior and de-cision-making, and the use of online data analysis can influence students' decision-making in presi-dential elections. Additionally, AI can be effective in detecting user behavior patterns on social networks and influencing voting behavior. These results can be useful for policymakers, election officials, and social activists in designing effective strategies to monitor user behavior and decision-making in the digital age, contributing to a better understanding of AI's role in shaping behavior and decision-making in society.

Social justice, as a concern of human society alongside concepts like freedom, security, democracy, and governance, has always received attention by justice-oriented thinkers. They have provided theo-ries on the concept of justice and how to achieve it. Among them are Morteza Motahari and John Rawls who regarded as influential in global thought. This article focuses on the concept of social jus-tice and its place in governance within the framework of the ideas of these two thinkers, utilizing a descriptive-comparative method by gathering primary data from related articles on social justice with-in a governance approach. For Martyr Motahari, justice is an innate matter, achievable only through the connection of human law to divine law. He sees justice as a fundamental reality created by natural order. In contrast, Rawls views justice as a civil matter, attainable through human consensus under conditions of fairness. This is why, they yield two different outcomes, while ultimately aim to shape reforms and essential concepts by emphasizing that governance cannot start without moving toward justice. Justice is presented as a marker, factor, and aspect essential for progress, development, and the attributes of fair and transcendental governance. Both theories assign duties to governments, as a principal pillar of public rights, in establishing social justice through legislation. However, their views diverge significantly in the origins and foundations of these perspectives, as Rawls approaches justice from a liberal viewpoint, Motahari articulates it in an Islamic context.0