درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

The study of compliment speech act has been under investigation on many occasions in recent years. In this study, an attempt is made to explore appraisals performed by native English speakers and Iranian EFL learners to find out how these two groups diverge or converge from each other with regard to complimenting patterns and norms. The participants of the study were 60 advanced Iranian EFL learners who were speaking Persian as their first language and 60 native English speakers. Through a written Discourse Completion Task comprised of eight different scenarios, compliments were analyzed with regard to topics (performance, personality, possession, and skill), functions (explicit, implicit, and opt-out), gender differences and the common positive adjectives used by two groups of native and nonnative participants. The findings suggested that native English speakers praised individuals more implicitly in comparison with Iranian EFL learners and native speakers provided opt-outs more frequently than Iranian EFL learners did. The analysis of data by Chi-square showed that gender and macro functions are independent of each other among Iranian EFL learners’ compliments while for native speakers, gender played a significant role in the distribution of appraisals. Iranian EFL learners’ complimenting patterns converge more towards those of native English speakers. Moreover, both groups favored explicit compliments. However, Iranian EFL learners were more inclined to provide explicit compliments. It can be concluded that there were more similarities rather than differences between Iranian EFL learners and native English speakers regarding compliment speech act. The results of this study can benefit researchers, teachers, material developers, and EFL learners.

This study investigated the role of interactive output tasks in developing EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. The participants were 103 elementary female Iranian EFL learners who were randomly divided into three groups: input-only, input-output-no-interaction, and input-output-interaction. After all participants took a placement test and a vocabulary pretest, the input-only group was exposed to input tasks, while the other two groups received both input and output tasks with or without interaction. Then, all the participants took a vocabulary posttest. The results of ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests showed that the participants in both the input-output-no-interaction group and the input-output-interaction group outperformed the ones in the input-only group in the vocabulary posttest (in both the overall vocabulary test and in the productive vocabulary section). Moreover, the results of the t-test and the Mann-Whitney test revealed that the participants in the interaction and no-interaction groups performed similarly on both the overall vocabulary posttest and the productive vocabulary section. The findings of this study support the idea that output is a facilitative factor for the acquisition of L2 vocabulary and, specifically, productive vocabulary development. The results also suggest that both interactive and non-interactive output-plus-input tasks can lead to higher achievement in vocabulary knowledge compared to the input-only condition lacking output tasks

تحقیق حاضر تلاشی است برای یافتن اینکه آیا مباحثه دو نفره برخط می تواند توان گفتاری زبان آموزان را تقویت کند. این مساله از آن جهت حائز اهمیت است که می تواند باعث از بین رفتن موانع برقراری ارتباط در کلاس شود و نیز از نظر روانی شرایط مناسبتری برای ایجاد ارتباط بین زبان آموزان فراهم کند. 30 دانشجوی سال اول دانشگاه تهران با استفاده از پیامرسان یاهو (Yahoo Messenger) به مدت 6 هفته پیاپی، دو به دو با یکدیگر به صورت برخط صحبت کردند. نتایج آزمون توانش گفتاری حاکی از وجود تفاوت معنی داری بین نمرات دانشجویان در پیش آزمون و پس آزمون بود. علاوه برآن، نتایج بدست آمده از پرسشنامه ها و آزمون های مورد استفاده در این تحقیق نشان داد که مباحثات برخط برای دانشجویان خجالتی و آنهایی که از نظر زبانی ضعیف ترند و نیز آنهایی که ایستاری مثبت نسبت به اینگونه فعالیتها دارند مفید تر بوده است. همچنین تجزیه و تحلیل میزان صحبت کردن دانشجویان از نظر تعداد دفعات و واژه هایی که در هر جلسه مورد استفاده قرار می دادند نشانگر آن بود که میزان شرکت فراگیران در مباحثات دو به دو یکسان نبود. این یافته برخلاف نتایج تحقیقات قبلی است .