خوانشی نشانه شناختی از یک رویای شاهانه (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
در بین نقاشی های دربار گورکانیان در هند، تعداد زیادی نگاره های تک برگی از چهره پادشاه، خاندان سلطنتی، درباریان و پادشاهان و سفرای دیگر کشورها، برجای مانده است. در مقاله پیش رو نگاره ای با عنوان«رویای جهانگیر» از نقاشی های دوران جهانگیر شاه گورکانی، انتخاب شده است. این نگاره که ملاقات خیالی شاه عباس اول و جهانگیر را به تصویر کشیده است پیام های متضادی از تمایل به دوستی و در همین حال میل به غلبه و برتری جویی را به مخاطب منتقل می کند. این پژوهش به دنبال یافتن پاسخ این پرسش است که: نقاشِ تصویر به دنبال پاسخگویی به کدام تمایلات جهانگیر شاه، به عنوان سفارش دهنده اثر بوده است؛ در این راستا با استفاده از روش نشانه شناسی اجتماعی تصویر به تحلیل محتوایی تصویر و خوانش دلالت های ضمنی این متن پرداخته شده است. در نهایت توانستیم به دلالت های ضمنی و آنچه که متن از بیان مستقیم آن اجتناب کرده، دست پیدا کنیم. بر اساس نتایجی که از تحلیل این نگاره به دست آمد می توان گفت دست کم پس از ماجرای قندهار، دلیل ادعای دوستی و برادری جهانگیر با شاه عباس نیاز به یک متحد قدرتمند در منطقه و عدم توان مقابله با او بوده و نه خواستی حقیقی.A Semiotic Reading of a Royal Dream
In the Imperial Mughal painting, there are many monographs of the portraits of the king, royal family, courtiers, and kings and ambassadors from other countries. The political relations between the Safavids and the Mughal are often accompanied by friendly engagement. The influence of these relationships in the Mughal's art can be found from the inspiring of Iranian painting techniques to illustration the Persian literature and the depiction of the portrait of the Safavid kings and ambassadors. This article studies a painting named Jahangir's Dream by a painter in Mughal court in India, and attempts to find out some contemporary meanings of this text by applying the symptomatic approach and visual semiotics methodology. Also, by using some comparative and contextual information that has been grasped by some contemporary verbal and visual texts with this painting, we could get into the unconscious layer of this text and what the text has denied saying them explicitly because of ideological repressions. This painting that was drawn after the siege of Qandahar by the Abbas I king of Iran. Composition of this image is a metaphoric structure such as more paintings that was drawn by the Jahangir's order, in spite of narrative structure that was common during his father Akbar's reign. For analyzing this image, social visual semiotics was selected as the method of research; and according to three metafunction which descript in this method we have done. Results from analyzing the Jahangir's Dream with have been shown that there are some Ideological signs with metaphoric functions in this painting. Have been found contradictory semantic implications that helped us understand the unconscious thought of the text. In this visual text has been tried to illustrate Jahangir as a superior ruler versus Abbas. At the first look deference between their garments attracts the audience attentions. The whit turban of him with contrast by gold halos round his head salience him. Jahangir as the active agent of the sense embracing Abbas, staring at a distant horizon and Left unanswered the eager eyes of Abbas. We could classify participants of this image in tow group, first of two is composed of Jahangir and Abbas and the second composed of lion and ship that lying on a globe with a detailed map. The lion under the Jahangir's foot that in this text Because of Companion Interpret as the metaphor of Mughal's territory push back the ship - metaphor of Safavid's territory- from Qandahar and even more so inside center of Iran. In conclusion, can be said which enmity and hypocrisy with a powerful neighbor and ally who recently attacked a part of their territory is a political position that is not politically in favor of Jahangir and seems to be repressed, but this desperate desire through contradictions and gaps this text is visible. The reason of Jahangir's claim of a friendly relationship between himself and Shah Abbas I, leastwise after Qandahar's story, could be his need of a strong confederate in the region, and his lack of enough power to resist against it, not his true will.
تبلیغات
