درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

Le roman Barbe Bleue d'Amélie Nothomb, une sorte de « réécriture littéraire » et un hypertexte du conte de La Barbe bleue de Perrault, dans un nouveau style propre à Nothomb, est l’un des champs d’étude qui reflètent les effets sociaux et géographiques sur la production littéraire. L’objectif principal de cette recherche sera d’analyser, dans une optique interdisciplinaire tout en supposant une nouvelle construction méthodologique, les dimensions sociologiques qui relèvent de la biographie d’Amélie Nothomb, grâce au point de vue de Bourdieu et dans le but de mettre en relief certain « habitus » chez elle : une personnalité féminine fortement construite par une aptitude d’adaptation aux contraintes sociales. Ce qui est aussi bien reflété dans cette œuvre à travers le personnage principal féminin. Nous distinguons aussi les éléments géographiques participant dans la nouvelle création de Barbe Bleue, et leurs rapports avec l’« habitus » « femme puissante » de l’écrivaine. Cette recherche analytique exploratoire suit certaines approches concernant la « géographie littéraire », comme celles de Gaston Bachelard et de Michel Collot, en se basant aussi sur les réflexions sociologiques de Pierre Bourdieu et d’Anthony Giddens. De ce fait, elle met en lumière l’importance de ces facteurs au sein du processus stylistique dans Barbe Bleue qui est d’ailleurs, une sorte de « réécriture au féminin » où Nothomb fait une nouvelle inspiration d’un espace géographique à l’intérieur duquel elle donne son propre regard sur l’histoire et sur le contexte social.

Résumé De tout temps, la connaissance de la grammaire occupe une place primordiale dans l'enseignement/apprentissage des langues étrangères. En effet, il est tout à fait nécessaire de maîtriser la grammaire d'une langue étrangère pour qu'on puisse écouter, lire, parler et écrire convenablement dans cette langue. Bien sûr, il y a beaucoup de facteurs biographiques, situationnels, affectifs et personnels qui interviennent dans ce processus. Un savoir général est donc indispensable au professeur de langue pour comprendre dans quelles conditions telle ou telle technique aide l'apprenant à apprendre la grammaire étrangère. Cette demande de savoir sur le fonctionnement de l'apprentissage est encore plus évidente chez les adultes qui forment la totalité de nos apprenants. Elle parait liée à la formation qu’ils ont reçue sur leur langue maternelle. Le but essentiel de notre étude est d'identifier les facteurs qui influencent l'apprentissage de la grammaire chez les étudiants de la langue et la littérature françaises en troisième année de licence de l'Université de Tabriz. Pour ce faire, nous avons préparé un questionnaire contenant des questions en rapport avec notre domaine d’étude et expliqué aux étudiants le vocabulaire spécialisé utilisé, afin de résoudre l'ambiguïté de la compréhension des questions avant de les présenter. Les questions et leurs réponses incluent les commentaires des élèves concernant le rôle et l'impact des langues déjà apprises par les apprenants, les facteurs environnementaux, les variables émotionnelles et les stratégies cognitives, métacognitives et socio-affectives d’apprentissage sur l'acquisition de la grammaire française.

L’accueil aux œuvres de Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867) en Iran, date de 1956, presque un siècle après leur publication en France. En 1857, Charles Baudelaire publie son œuvre majeure, un recueil de poèmes intitulé Les Fleurs du Mal. La littérature française a exercé une grande influence sur la littérature persane. On pourrait dire que l’arrivée au pouvoir des différents rois et les conditions qui régnaient dans la société iranienne, ont probablement exercé une influence sur la façon dont ces poèmes ont été traduits. Cette approche tente d’être une analyse de l’accueil de l’Iran aux œuvres de Charles Baudelaire. Pour cela, dans la perspective de la théorie de la réception de Hans Robert Jauss, nous examinons les conditions « socio-culturelles » qui régissent la société et leur impact sur la traduction des poèmes de Charles Baudelaire en Iran, et cherchons à dégager les différents horizons d’attente des lecteurs iraniens avant et après la Révolution islamique. Cet article décrit l’œuvre de ce poète français en Iran, et la façon dont elle a été traduite, lue et commentée.

The impact of humor on language acquisition has been documented in scholarly accounts. Hence, this study investigated Iranian pre-service and high-experienced and low-experienced in-service EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices of humor in the classroom. In order to collect data, the researchers adopted four distinct instruments including pedagogical humor questionnaire, semi-structured interview, observation checklist, and field notes. A total of 182 Iranian EFL teachers participated completed the questionnaires, while 10 in-service EFL teachers engaged in semi-structured interviews. Additionally, the second researcher observed 36 classes. The results indicated that both pre-service and in-service EFL teachers believed that humor was effective. Notably, high-experienced in-service EFL teachers displayed more pronounced positive beliefs in humor compared to their pre-service and low-experienced counterparts. The results also disclosed that humor was a routine practice for high-experienced teachers. Based on the findings of the present study, it can be suggested that it is essential to train and educate both pre-service and in-service EFL teachers in order to integrate humor into different EFL classrooms.

Many studies on L1 and/or L2 pragmatic competence are constrained by universalist orientations towards sociopragmatics and overlook the idiosyncratic cultural scripts and schemas of underexplored languages and cultures. Particularly neglected is the complicating role of Iranian cultural schema of a (dis-)belief in the evil eye with regards to the speech act of complimenting (and responding to it); actually, the schema is hypothesized (Talebzadeh & Rajabi, in preparation; Younesi & Talebzadeh, 202) to pose intricate interactional challenges for both parties due to the possible interpretations of and (non-)verbal responses to compliments (as predominantly Face-Saving Acts versus potentially Face-Threatening Acts). Moreover, still unknown is the way these could confound EFL learners’ cross-cultural communications. To address these gaps, we present the second phase of a more comprehensive study of compliment response (CR) behaviors of Iranian respondents while checking the adequacy of our proposed model (inspired by Herber’s taxonomy). To qualitatively and quantitatively examine the CRs of fifteen proficient Iranian female learners of English, we initially collected the data using two sets of Discourse Completion Tasks (DCT) (in Persian and English) consisting of a variety of situations and variables (e.g., social distance and compliment topics). Then, follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted to tap into the participants’ (non-)beliefs in the evil eye and its presupposed effects on their compliment exchanges. The findings underscore the adequacy of our modified model and the particularities of Iranian cultural schemas. Specifically, being a widespread belief, evil-eye is shown to play a pivotal role in formulating the responses to compliments through the selective application of CR types such as Cheshm-Zadan and Taarof in reaction to the compliments given (particularly those on family members or beloved ones) across both languages. The study concludes with a discussion of the findings with reference to the relevant literature and implications for intercultural communication, language education, and sociopragmatic research and practice.

The process of foreign language syntactic development regarding learners’ L1 literacy level is different among adult learners. Many studies have shown that illiterate and low-literate learners follow the same path in the L2 morphosyntax development despite their L1 literacy level. However, little research has been carried out to focus on differences in the new language literacy development among learners with varying first language proficiency. Therefore, the current study was carried out to investigate the differences in learning English adjectival and prepositional phrases among three Kurdish adult groups of literate, low-literate, and illiterate learners in one term. Additionally, it probed the major difficulties they faced through the English phrase acquisition process. Mixed methods were used for data collection including observations of the classes supplemented by audio recording and English phrase tests. Through the application of three tests of recognition, matching, and multiple-choice type, the outcome knowledge of adjectival and prepositional phrases was assessed and compared among groups. The obtained data were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test. Some tangible results were detected from tests that did not ascribe the differences in learning English absolutely to background schooling and literacy. In fact, they showed that there were significant differences among groups in matching and multiple-choice type post-tests, while there were no considerable differences in recognition-type post-test. Furthermore, results also revealed that illiterate and low-literate learners encountered further complicated difficulties and made an unusual combination of pronunciation and grammatical errors in their production.

Digital formative assessment was considered as using digital tools and technology to apply formative assessment in the EFL classrooms. Moreover, language learners’ vocabulary retention and spelling abilities are at the heart of language learning. Therefore, the present study examined the effects of digital formative assessment in improving Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners’ spelling achievement and vocabulary retention in Mashhad. Fifty (N=25 male & N=25 female) pre-intermediate EFL learners into two groups took part in the study. The study was an experimental study with pre-test and post-test designs. The experimental group used the Spelling Bee application in contrast to the control group. This application could present corrected words to students when they did something wrong. Moreover, the teacher gave feedback to students during tasks. The control group did their tasks on the sheet and got feedback from the teacher. KET (Key English Test) test, vocabulary, and spelling test were used as the instruments of the study. At the beginning of the study vocabulary and spelling tests were presented as a pretest to participants in both groups. The participants answered the spelling and vocabulary tests as the post-tests. After the posttest, a delayed posttest was presented to assess vocabulary retention. The obtained results revealed that the use of the digital formative assessment had no significant effect on pre-intermediate Iranian EFL learners ’spelling achievement and vocabulary retention. Administrators, EFL teachers, and EFL language learners, can take advantage of the result of the present study.

Although the EFL teachers' challenges in developing and enhancing Professional Identity Formation (PIF) in face-to-face and virtual instruction contexts have extensively been explored, there were a limited set of practical and advantageous strategies, particularly for the novice teachers, in promoting their PIF in E-teaching especially since the emergence of changed priority of teaching contexts amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Accordingly, this study attempted to check the Iranian novice EFL teachers’ PIF, uncover the potential impacts of utilizing Online Image Management (OIM) strategies in promoting their PIF, and identify the most-preferred OIM strategies. Based on the convenience sampling, 184 male and female Iranian novice EFL teachers were selected to participate in this quasi-experimental study. Two instruments, including a Questionnaire of Perceived Professional Identity (QPPI) and a series of Quantitative Online Interviews (QOIs), were used to collect the data via the virtual platform of Survey Planet. The descriptive statistics and Independent Samples t-Test packages in R were utilized to analyze the data. The results confirmed the low levels of professional identity among Iranian novice EFL teachers, verified the significant effects of OIM strategies in promoting PIF of Iranian novice EFL teachers, and shed light on reflection practices and strategies in enhancing digital literacy as the most-favored OIM strategies in promoting PIF among these teachers. This study may provide implications for EFL teachers and trainers in helping novice EFL teachers to promote their PIF with OIM strategies.

Willingness to communicate is subject to the moment-by-moment fluctuations in the classroom. Therefore, teachers’ decisive role comes to the foreground as they can increase learners’ desire to communicate at a particular moment by their interventions. Online instruction, despite furnishing learners with authentic material, has failed to culminate in communication thanks to connection problems or lack of non-verbal clues. Thus, the present study aimed to explore Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of strategies to promote willingness to communicate of learners in online classes. The mixed-methods design was employed to answer the research questions. To this end, a self-designed questionnaire was first piloted and then administered to the main sample which included thirty-seven teachers. The questionnaire subsumed five effective factors garnered from extant literature. Five teachers were interviewed as to their perceptions of pros and cons of promoting WTC in online classrooms. The results indicated that teachers’ motivational strategies were perceived to promote WTC best in online classes followed by teacher immediacy. Qualitative reports also corroborated the numerical data. Lack of non-verbal clues i.e. body language was perceived to decrease learners’ motivation and participation; however, technological resources like games were reported to increase WTC in online classes. Teachers should pay heed to their crucial role in inciting positive atmosphere and get better equipped to capitalize on online affordances to increase participation in online classes.

The present study compares the elements and main elements of the sentence (subject, predicate, and linking verbs) in Persian and Arabic languages to prove the hypothesis of many rhetorical similarities in the science of semantics of these two languages. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the researcher directly goes to the contents and expresses them, then concludes by analyzing these direct data. The main goal of the research is to answer the question of what is the main structure of the sentences and the position of the subject, and the predicate from the point of view of the semantics of Persian and Arabic languages. Further, it proved the hypothesis of the plurality of rhetorical commonalities. In general, what can be stated as the final and summary result of all the discussions in this paper is the correctness of the hypothesis of a large number of rhetorical correspondences in the discussed subject in Persian and Arabic languages; however, sometimes, differences are observed in the topics or existing materials. Also, in this research, the writer discusses issues such as article and indefinite article, addition, and omission, position and different forms of subject and predicate in Persian and Arabic languages, along with their commonalities and differences.