اصغر عربیان

SUBJECT & OBJECTIVES: The crisis of forced migration driven by environmental degradation and climate change has emerged as one of the most complex challenges confronting the global community in the 21st century. While dominant policy discourses tend to locate solutions primarily in green technologies, climate policies, and humanitarian assistance, this article advances a novel interdisciplinary argument: at its core, the crisis is rooted in a profound moral and spiritual rupture in the modern human–nature relationship. Effective engagement with this challenge, therefore, requires the revitalization of a comprehensive, meaning-giving framework for living on Earth. METHOD & FINDING: Employing an analytical–descriptive methodology and drawing upon foundational Islamic sources—the Quran and the Sunnah—as well as contemporary interdisciplinary literature on environmental ethics, this study proposes and explicates a conceptual model of a sustainable Islamic lifestyle. This model is presented as a human, value-oriented approach that complements conventional policy solutions. Grounded in Islam’s divine unity (tawḥīd)-centered ontology, the model organizes the key components of lifestyle across three interrelated levels: the individual, the social, and the governance spheres. CONCLUSION: The findings of the article demonstrate that this integrated framework—by institutionalizing principles such as tawḥīd-orientation, trusteeship (amānah), moderation (iʿtidāl), contentment (qanāʿah), intergenerational justice, and shared responsibility—can systematically reduce pressure on natural resources, enhance community resilience, and mitigate the principal drivers of forced environmental migration. The article concludes that reviving a lifestyle rooted in practical wisdom (ḥikmah ʿamaliyyah) of Islam is not merely a cultural option but an ecological and ethical imperative for navigating the current crisis and building a just and sustainable future for all inhabitants of the Earth.

According to the reports of relevant national and international authorities about corruption, the rank of Iran is high according to the determined indicators. In such a way that among the 133 evaluated countries, it has been ranked 79th, which has harmful effects on the country's development. What is certain is that many efforts have been made in the field of administrative health in Iran. However, administrative health policies have not been very successful with regard to the injuries suffered. The main purpose of this article is to identify the harms of administrative health policies in the areas of planning and formulating policies, implementing and monitoring the implementation of administrative health policies, and designing its conceptual model. Therefore, for the first time in Iran, this research has investigated the damage components of administrative health policies by using the existing theoretical foundations. The statistical population of this survey consists of 390 employees and academics in the fields of political science, law, management, and economics, in five provinces of the country (Tehran, Golestan, East Azerbaijan, Qom, and Hormozgan); which were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The findings of the survey show that the following components are confirmed as damages of administrative health policies: 1- Damages related to the formulation of administrative health policies. 2- Damages related to the implementation stage of administrative health policies. 3- Damages related to monitoring the implementation of administrative health policies.

Neglecting and ignorance of citizenship rights by the socio-political system is one of the soft war manifestations against the Islamic Revolution of Iran in recent decades. Accordingly, to defend and introduce the original Islamic thought in the field of citizenship rights, the present study aimed to explain the position of this concept and its derived components by examining the principles and perspectives related to citizenship rights in the Islamic Revolution foundations. To this aim, used library and descriptive method and discourse analysis of Laclau and Mouffe using Quranic verses and critical legal documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Then, the symbols of Islamic discourse on citizenship rights were extracted, and objective examples were studied in important legal documents of the republic. Citizenship rights in Islamic discourse are based on the semantic system from the central symbol of purified life and the signs of the principles of dignity, security, freedom and the executive guarantee of citizenship rights. Evaluating the status of citizenship rights in the social and political context of post-revolutionary Iran indicates that the Islamic Revolution discourse has a strong potential for fulfilling citizenship rights. The constitution addresses citizenship rights in various dimensions, including public-private security, judicial law, liberty rights in multiple sizes, participant rights in the administration of national affairs, economic, social and cultural rights, and the rights of vulnerable groups. The implementing citizenship rights specified in this law are guaranteed in parts of the Islamic Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code.