درخت حوزه‌های تخصصی

جامعه شناسی علم و معرفت و تکنولوژی

فیلتر های جستجو: فیلتری انتخاب نشده است.
نمایش ۶۶۱ تا ۶۶۴ مورد از کل ۶۶۴ مورد.
۶۶۳.

بررسی رابطه بین عوامل فردی و اجتماعی کاربران ICT با میزان پذیرش ICT در سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان چهارمحال و بختیاری در سال 1386(مقاله پژوهشی دانشگاه آزاد)

۶۶۴.

The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals

منبع: Journal of Scholarly Publishing Vol. 42, No. 2, January 2011.

کلید واژه ها: scientific journals peer-review process types of refereeing referee editorial board

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۳۲۰
The purpose of this research was to study the peer-review process for articles in Iran's accredited scientific journals. The study considered the types of refereeing currently practised, the decision-making methods and criteria for acceptance of articles, the major decision makers, and the current norms in the peer-review process. The method used was a survey, and the data-collecting tool was a questionnaire. The statistical population of this research included 245 scientific journals. The results of the study show that, currently, the predominant type of refereeing for articles submitted to these journals is ‘double blind’ and the prevailing method of informing authors about the results of manuscript evaluation is ‘commenting on the manuscript after refereeing it and after consideration in an editorial board meeting.’ The findings also indicate that two criteria—‘Originality and creativity of the research’ and ‘Being within the journal's scope’—play the most important role in article acceptance. Of the five main parties cooperating in the peer-review process for these journals, the editorial board plays the most fundamental role.

پالایش نتایج جستجو

تعداد نتایج در یک صفحه:

درجه علمی

مجله

سال

زبان