آرشیو

آرشیو شماره ها:
۳۲

چکیده

وسواس یک اختلال اضطرابی مزمن است که با اشتغال ذهنی مفرط در مورد نظم و ترتیب و امور جزئی و همچنین کمال طلبی همراه است، تا حدی که به از دست دادن انعطاف پذیری، صراحت و کارایی می انجامد. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی روابط ساختاری میان نشانه های اختلال شخصیت مرزی و سبک های دلبستگی با نشانه های وسواس به واسطه تنظیم هیجان بود. طرح پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی همبستگی مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری ( SEM) و روش نمونه گیری آن تصادفی خوشه ای بوده، بدین ترتیب که 5 دانشکده دانشگاه تبریز به طور تصادفی انتخاب شدند و در بین دانشکده ها به طور تصادفی بین کلاس های ورودی 98 پرسشنامه ها توزیع گردید و به منظور سنجش نشانه های وسواس از سیاهه بازنگری شده وسواسی-جبری Foa et al. (2002) نشانه های شخصیت مرزی از پرسشنامه اختلال شخصیت مرزی (1984) Claridge and Broks و سبک های دلبستگی از پرسشنامهHazan and Shaver (1987) و تنظیم هیجان از پرسشنامه Gross and John (2003) استفاده گردید. داده های به دست آمده از طریق مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که نشانه های شخصیت مرزی و سبک های دلبستگی در قالب روابط ساختاری و به واسطه ی راهبردهای تنظیم هیجان (سرکوبی – ارزیابی مجدد) قادرند تغییرات نشانه های وسواس را بطور معنی دار تبیین کنند.

Structural Relationships of Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms and Attachment Styles with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms

Introduction Obsession is a chronic anxiety disorder that is associated with excessive mental preoccupation with order and detail, as well as perfectionism, to the extent that it leads to the loss of flexibility, openness, and efficiency, which, despite the high prevalence, is one of the most resistant disorders to treatment.Obsessive-compulsive disorder sufferers experience a range of emotional reactions when faced with situations that trigger obsessive thoughts and actions. There are individual differences related to the sensitivity to these emotions and the way they are regulated, which is called emotional regulation (Hoffman, Carpenter, & Joshua, 2016). Therefore, the purpose of this research was to investigate the structural relationships between borderline personality disorder symptoms and attachment styles with obsessive symptoms through emotion regulation.   Method Research design the present is a descriptive correlation (Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and its sampling method is cluster random, so that 5 faculties of Tabriz University were randomly selected and 200 questionnaires were randomly distributed among the faculties. In order to measure the signs of obsession from the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCI-R) list, borderline personality traits from the Borderline Personality Disorder (STB) questionnaire, and attachment styles from the Hazen and shaver and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire from Gross and John (2003) The data were analyzed through structural equation modeling Results The obtained data were analyzed through structural equation modeling. The results showed that the effect of borderline personality disorder on obsessive symptoms is significant with an effect size of 0.35. The effect of borderline personality disorder on reappraisal is significant with an effect size of -0.52, and the effect of borderline personality disorder on repression is significant with an effect size of 0.38. The effect of borderline personality disorder on obsessive symptoms due to reappraisal is significant with an effect size of -0.36, and the effect of borderline personality disorder on obsessive symptoms due to suppression is significant with an effect size of 0.16. The effect of secure attachment on obsessive symptoms is significant with an effect size of -0.39. The effect of secure attachment on reappraisal and suppression is significant with an effect size of -0.31. The effect of avoidant attachment on obsessive symptoms is significant with an effect size of 0.27, on reappraisal with an effect size of -0.32, and on suppression with an effect size of 0.31. The effect of avoidant attachment on obsessive symptoms is not significant due to reappraisal with an effect size of -0.07 and suppression with an effect size of 0.06. The effect of ambivalent attachment is significant on obsessive symptoms with an effect size of 0.30, on reappraisal with an effect size of -0.29, and on suppression with an effect size of 0.50. The effect of ambivalent attachment on obsessive symptoms due to reappraisal is not significant with an effect size of -0.09, and the effect of ambivalent attachment on obsessive symptoms due to suppression is significant with an effect size of 0.15.   Discussion Therefore, it can be concluded that the findings of this research can have important practical effects for clinical therapists and psychologists to pay attention to the structural relationships of borderline personality disorder symptoms and attachment styles with obsessive symptoms through emotional regulation.  

تبلیغات