ارائه مدل برنامه آموزشی برای دانشگاه های نسل چهارم در ایران با رویکرد آمیخته (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
هدف : پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل برنامه آموزشی برای دانشگاه های نسل چهارم در ایران انجام شد.روش شناسی: روش تحقیق از نظر هدف بنیادی و از نظر روش اجرا آمیخته (کیفی-کمی) بود. جامعه بخش کیفی شامل خبرگان و اساتید برنامه ریزی آموزشی دانشگاهی ایران در سال تحصیلی 400-1399 بودند که طبق اصل اشباع نظری 17 نفر از آنها با روش های نمونه گیری گلوله برفی و هدفمند به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. جامعه بخش کمی شامل کلیه دانشجویان مراکز آموزش عالی سراسر ایران در سال تحصیلی 400-1399 بودند که طبق فرمول کوکران 384 نفر آنها با روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چندمرحله ای به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و در بخش کمی از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شد که شاخص های روانسنجی آنها تایید شدند. داده ها با روش های کدگذاری در نرم افزار MAXQDA و تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و مدل یابی معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزارهای SPSS و LISREL تحلیل شدند.یافته ها: یافته های بخش کیفی نشان داد که 51 شاخص در قالب 7 مقوله رویکرد آموزشی مبتنی بر آموزش همتایان، آموزش مبتنی بر عمل، تسهیل فرصت های شبیه سازی شده، توجه به روش های یادگیری گروهی، یادگیری خودهدایت شده و خودراهبر، فعالیت های مبتنی بر یادگیری اکتشافی و روش های نوین تدریس شناسایی شد. یافته های بخش کمی نشان داد که 34 گویه در قالب 7 مقوله مذکور قرار گرفتند که بار عاملی همه آنها بالاتر از 70/0، میانگین واریانس استخراج شده همه آنها بالاتر از 60/0 و پایایی همه آنها بالاتر از 80/0 بود. دیگر نتایج نشان داد که برنامه آموزشی برای دانشگاه های نسل چهارم بر هر هفت مقوله رویکرد آموزشی مبتنی بر آموزش همتایان، آموزش مبتنی بر عمل، تسهیل فرصت های شبیه سازی شده، توجه به روش های یادگیری گروهی، یادگیری خودهدایت شده و خودراهبر، فعالیت های مبتنی بر یادگیری اکتشافی و روش های نوین تدریس اثر مستقیم و معنادار داشت (05/0P<).بحث و نتیجه گیری : با توجه به شناسایی هفت مقوله و اثر مستقیم و معنادار برنامه آموزشی پژوهش حاضر بر هفت مقوله، برنامه ریزی جهت بهبود برنامه آموزشی برای دانشگاه های نسل چهارم از طریق هفت مقوله ذکرشده در بالا ضروری است.Providing a Curriculum Model for Fourth Generation Universities in Iran with a Mixed Approach
Purpose: In our country, most universities are in the first generation and a limited number of them are in the second generation, and the third and fourth generations of universities in Iran have not been seriously considered yet. Accordingly, many graduates do not succeed in the market due to lack of entrepreneurial skills. Therefore, it is essential that the university, as the source of all changes in society, be at the forefront of the entrepreneurial process, and in order to change educational and research patterns and change students' skills and abilities, they must change their education strategy and train entrepreneurial and creative people. In fact, third and fourth generation universities are education-oriented, research-oriented and knowledge-based universities that seek to create value and wealth by developing effective knowledge and entrepreneurship. Curricula, as the heart of higher education, must be aligned with the indicators of this generation of academics in order to pave the way for progress in line with these indicators. The fourth generation universities provide the ground for the realization of up-to-date progress and in accordance with the requirements that are commensurate with the development of changing knowledge and technology. The present study was conducted with the aim of providing a curriculum model for fourth generation universities in Iran.Methodology: The research method was fundamental in terms of purpose and mixed (qualitative-quantitative) in terms of implementation method. The qualitative community consisted of experts and professors of Iranian university educational planning in the academic year 2020-21, according to the principle of theoretical saturation, 17 of them were selected as a sample by snowball and targeted sampling methods. The quantitative population consisted of all students of higher education centers throughout Iran in the academic year 1399-400, according to the Cochran's formula, 384 of them were selected as a sample by multi-stage cluster sampling. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect information in the qualitative section and a researcher-made questionnaire was used in the quantitative section, and their psychometric indices were confirmed. Data were analyzed by coding methods in MAXQDA software and heuristic factor analysis and structural equation modeling in SPSS and LISREL software.Findings: The findings of the qualitative section showed that 51 indicators in the form of 7 categories of educational approach based on peer education, action-based education, facilitating simulated opportunities, attention to group learning methods, self-directed and self-directed learning, activities based on exploratory learning and new methods Teaching was identified. The findings of the quantitative section showed that 17 items were removed due to a factor load of less than 0.30 and the initial questionnaire was reduced from 51 items to 34 items. , According to group learning methods, self-directed and self-directed learning, activities based on exploratory learning and new teaching methods, all of which have a factor load of more than 0.70, the mean variance of all of them is higher than 0.60 and the reliability of all of them is higher than It was 0.80 that their factor loading was confirmed due to being higher than 0.30, their mean extracted variance was confirmed due to being higher than 0.50 and their reliability was confirmed due to being higher than 0.70. Other results showed that the curriculum for fourth generation universities on all seven categories of peer-to-peer educational approach, action-based education, simulated opportunities, attention to group learning methods, self-directed and self-directed learning, exploratory learning-based activities and new methods. Teaching had a direct and significant effect (P <0.05).Conclusion: Considering the identification of seven categories and the direct and significant effect of the current research curriculum on the seven categories, planning to improve the curriculum for fourth generation universities through the seven categories mentioned above is necessary.