یأس و امید در شعر أمل دنقل و سیاوش کسرایی (تحلیل نشانه شناسی مؤلفه های: مکان-زمان و اسطوره ها) (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
در سال های اخیر دانش نشانه شناسی بابی تازه در تحلیل، فهم و نقد متون ادبی و کشف زوایای پنهان آن به وجود آورده است. أمل دنقل شاعر معاصر مصری و سیاوش کسرایی از جمله شاعران دغدغه مندی هستند که در زمانه ای متلاطم زیسته اند. نابسامانی های سیاسی و اجتماعی در محتوا و ساختار شعر این دو به شدت تأثیر گذاشته است. این مقاله با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی، مضمون «یأس و امید» در مؤلفه های نشانه شناسی مکان-زمان و اسطوره ها، در سروده های این دو شاعر را بررسی و با هم مقایسه نموده است و درصدد پاسخ گویی به این پرسش است که این درون مایه چگونه در شعر دو شاعر متجلی شده است. نتایج به دست آمده از این پژوهش، گویای آن است که شعر دو شاعر با وجود شباهت های فراوان در درون مایه-هایی چون اعتراض به وضع موجود و دعوت به مبارزه، بسیار با هم متفاوت است. در شعرکسرایی همواره جلوه هایی از روشنایی و بالندگی دیده می شود. کاربست نشانه های مکان، زمان و اسطوره ها در شعر او، به منزله دمیدن روح امید در هموطنان است. شعر حماسی «آرش کمانگیر» نمونه ای آشکار از این نگاه سرشار از امیدواری است؛ اما شعر امل دنقل که سرشار از هنر شعری و هنجارگریزی های زبانی است، به شکلی عمیق متأثر از شکست های پی در پی جهان عرب و در گرداب یأسی سهمگین غوطه ور است؛ به گونه ای که کاربرد مکان، زمان و اسطوره ها در شعر وی، به شدت تیره است. شعر وی سویه تاریک حوادث را برجسته نموده است. سروده «البکاء بین یدی رزقاء الیمامه»، تصویری جامع از همه شعر اوست.متن
Hope and Despair in Amal Donqol and Siavash Kasraei’s Poems (A Semiotic Analysis of Time-Place and Myths Components)
Introduction Semiotics has provided researchers in the immediate past years with a tool for analyzing, understanding, and criticism of literary texts and discovery of hidden meanings. Semiotics has tried to unveil, decipher, and discover the deep meanings behind the structure. Amal Donqol (a contemporary Egyptian poet) and Siavash Kasraei (an Iranian poet) lived in their turbulent times. Political and social disorders intensively influenced the content and structure of their poems. The comparative semiotic study investigates meticulously and in detail the works of the Egyptian and Iranian poets considering hope and despair. It hopes to have a better and deeper understanding of the poets’ thoughts and spirits and their influence on their poems. Moreover, the study makes the ground for better presenting of the similarities and differences of their attitudes, as they live in rather similar conditions. Using the semiotics of the application of time, place, and myths, the study investigated the duality of despair and hope in some poems of the two poets regarding the structure and poetic language. It tried to answer the question that how despair and hope have been presented in the poems and in mentioned components and how their poetic and artistic manifestations are. Method This descriptive-analytic study was done within the American framework of comparative literature. Discussion Semiology (or semiotics) is a new type of criticism that has had a great impact on literary studies and related research. This field of study interprets literary texts according to such criteria and layers as time, place, intertextuality, narration, character, etc. This study explored the place, time, and mythical characters to show the appearance of hope and despair in the selected poems. The components work as codes for the poet through which he shows his inner feelings and imposes positive or negative meaning upon them. The analysis of the signs unveils the hidden layers of meanings in a literary text and familiars readers with the world, thoughts, and feelings of its writer. Time and place as signs and their signified are various and wide in literary texts and important for reading texts. The poets have used many words showing place and time. In many cases, adverbs showing the place in Donqol and Kasraei's poems lose the characteristic of being adverb of place and become a signifier having specific signifiers. The time adverbs have also been used in this way as their poems shows the change many times. The words become positively or negatively marked as they convey the poets’ feelings. These words convey meanings different from their place and time meanings, which engages the readership with one of the dualities of despair or hope . Myth is also an important component that imposes meaning on the meaning in works of both poets. Using and recreating the myths, the poets communicate their ideals and spirits to the audience. Conclusion - The study investigated the duality of despair or hope in the poems of two poets based on the application of some components of the semiotics of time, place, and myths. The socio-political conditions that the two poets live in seem to be the same and their poems protest against their contemporary situation, but based on the mentioned examples one can say that when the poems have been composed, when death and despair were dominant in the mental space of poets, he optimistically expected a bright future, whereas death and despair are always dominant in Amal Danqol's poems. - As a result of the different views of the poets, time, place, and myth have a hopeful and liberating application in the poems. In Amal's poems, however, the place, time, and myth components become nightmares of fear and failure, as a result of his sad and desperate creations. - Finally, looking from semiotic analysis, it can be concluded that the fully optimistic and hopeful poems of Siavash Kasraei sometimes lack poetic fantasy and becomes similar to prose, making it a weakness of the poems. On the contrary, Amal Danqol's poems, though exaggerates in expressing darkness, they are totally strong and surprising sometimes regarding poetic beauties, creating new meanings, and linguistic deviations. -
تبلیغات
