Peirce

This bibliometric analysis explores the integration of semiotics within educational contexts, highlighting a transformative shift towards multifaceted understandings of knowledge construction through language, multimodality, and educational transformation. Drawing on 1823 publications from the Web of Science database, this study employs both co-citation and co-word analysis to reveal prevalent themes and keywords in the field of semiotics in education. The co-citation analysis highlights the evolution of semiotic theories and their application in educational practices, from foundational concepts introduced by pioneers such as Saussure and Peirce to modern interpretations that consider the impact of digital technologies on semiotic resources. Co-word analysis, on the other hand, uncovers key research topics such as multimodality, multiliteracies, and the role of technology in mediating semiotic learning processes. This investigation is novel in its comprehensive approach to mapping the semiotic landscape in education through bibliometric methods, offering insights into how semiotic theories shape educational practices and outcomes, especially in language teaching and learning. By synthesizing findings from diverse research clusters, this study emphasizes the importance of adopting a multidisciplinary approach to understand the dynamic interaction between semiotics, technology, and learning. It contributes to advancing educational research by highlighting the transformative potential of semiotics in crafting more engaging, inclusive, and effective learning environments in the digital era.

Human beings are meaning-generators, and their pursuit of meaning manifests through interpreting “signs.” Architectural elements can be perceived as signs capable of conveying valuable and significant messages. The more precise the semiotic interpretation of architectural elements, the deeper the understanding of their meaning. Since entry into any space necessitates passing through its door, the door functions as a connector between different realms, as an intermediary between a given place’s exterior and interior. Given the unique architectural significance of doors at entrances of Islamic pilgrimage shrines, they can be interpreted as meaningful signs. “Being at the shrine” can be understood as a form of human presence, which is materialized at entrances of Islamic pilgrimage shrines, particularly through the focal point of the door. The door marks the beginning of a transition into a sacred space, and numerous rituals are associated with this entry point. These rituals emphasize the commencement of the rites of entrance and initiation into a holy site. This study applies semiotic analysis based on Peirce’s model to examine the architectural element of the door as a meaningful sign. It seeks to answer the following questions: How can the physical characteristics of an entrance be interpreted both as a response to functional necessity and as a meaning-generating sign in the forms of index (namāya), symbol (namād), and icon (shamāyil)? Additionally, what concepts are semantically aligned with the door concerning the entrances of Islamic pilgrimage shrines? The research is based on a library study for data collection and employs a descriptive-analytical method to interpret the semiotics of doors. The findings indicate that the architectural element of the door, beyond its functional essence, encapsulates profound meanings. Semiotics offers a powerful tool for enhancing this architectural element’s understanding and deep analysis, allowing for a more precise interpretation. The primary function of the door as a sign is to establish a communicative space between the exterior and the interior. The door facilitates guidance and invitation into the sacred environment by dividing the spatial domain into inside and outside. Moreover, the first rites of initiation and presence commence here—placing the hand on the chest, expressing reverence, offering salutations, and seeking permission to enter. Therefore, the door is the gateway to the realm of presence and encounter. In the entrance of Islamic pilgrimage shrines, the door can be interpreted as a symbolic manifestation of the Divine Name al-Hādī (the Guide), the Imam’s guidance, the Perfect Man’s station, and the mediator of Divine Grace

Contrairement à l’idée répandue qui réduit le silence à une absence ou à un simple vide, il importe d’envisager celui-ci comme unélément constitutif du langage et du discours. Dans le Masnavi de Jalâl od-Din Rûmî, figure majeure du soufisme et de la littérature persane, le silence apparaît non pas comme une négation de la parole, mais comme une composante essentielle de la production du sens. L’objectif de cette recherche est d’analyser les fonctions sémiotiques du silence dans le Masnavi et de montrer son rôle fondamental dans la dynamique discursive et spirituelle de l’œuvre. La présente étude relève de la recherche théorique et descriptive, fondée sur une analyse textuelle et sémiotique. Elle mobilise la grille conceptuelle de la sémiotique peircienne, articulée avec la sémiotique discursive, pour examiner le fonctionnement du silence dans le discours mystique de Rûmî. L’approche repose principalement sur l’étude des passages du Masnavi où le silence est explicitement évoqué ou se manifeste implicitement à travers la rétention de l’énonciation, les interruptions narratives ou les injonctions au mutisme. Les résultats montrent que le silence, loin d’être neutre, constitue un signe pluriel et dynamique. Il assume différentes valeurs sémiotiques (icône, indice, symbole) et s’articule aux autres signes matériels et discursifs pour former une chaîne interprétative continue. Sur le plan plus spécifique, il apparaît comme une présence signifiante, à la fois linguistique et spirituelle.