واکاوی ارتباط مؤلفه های تأثیرگذار بر ایجاد حس دل بستگی به محیط در مدارس متوسطه دخترانه ارومیه بر اساس نظریه سیمون؛ نمونه موردی: پایه هفتم مدارس دخترانه ناحیه 2 ارومیه (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
امروزه طراحی محیط های آموزشی به عنوان عرصه رشد و تکامل نوجوانان به عنوان نسل آینده، فراتر از ساحت کالبدی، از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار است که نوجوانان در طول دوران تحصیل خود به آن معنا بخشیده و به آن دلبسته می شوند. مکان از جنبه های مادی و غیر مادی، نوعی احساس را در کاربران خود القا می کند که می تواند نوعی دلبستگی به مکان در افراد ایجاد نماید و این دلبستگی منجر به ایجاد روابط اجتماعی بین افراد و محافظت از مکان می شود. برای افزایش حس دلبستگی به مکان نظریه های متعددی از جمله نظریه سیمون مطرح شده است. هدف از این پژوهش شناسایی مؤلفه های تاثیرگذار نظریه سیمون (Being of place - Becoming of place) و ارتباط آن ها با حس دل بستگی به مکان در مدارس می باشد. در جهت تحقق اهداف، ابتدا با روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی در بستری پیمایشی و بامطالعه منابع کتابخانه ای نظریه سیمون بررسی و مؤلفه های موثّر به صورت چارچوب نظری تدوین گردید و سپس با استفاده از روش تحلیل عامل تأییدی به اولویت بندی و ارتباط مؤلفه ها پرداخته شد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 7404 نفر از دانش آموزان دختر پایه هفتم متوسطه اول مدارس دولتی ناحیه 2 شهر ارومیه که تعداد نمونه 365 نفر از فرمول کوکران بدست آمد. گردآوری اطلاعات از طریق پرسشنامه مؤلف ساخت انجام پذیرفت. یافته ها نشان داد در این پژوهش از میان متغیرهای درون زای مدل نظریه سیمون شامل تقویت مکانی، مکان آفرینی، تحقق مکانی، رهایی مکانی، هویت مکانی و تعامل مکانی، مولفه های تاثیرگذار بر حس دلبستگی در مدارس دخترانه عبارتند از تقویت مکانی، مکان آفرینی و تحقق مکانی. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که تحقق مکانی نقش واسطه ای در ارتباط با تقویت مکانی و مکان آفرینی دارد لذا می توان با ارتقای متغیر تقویت مکانی، تحقق مکانی را افزایش داد و از این طریق به ارتقای حس دلبستگی به مکان به کمک متغیر مکان آفرینی رسید.Analyzing the factors influencing place attachment among 7th-grade students in girls’ secondary schools in Urmia based on Seamon’s attachment theory; Case study: Municipal district 2
Extended Abstract
Background and Objectives: A place is any environmental setting where individual or group actions, experiences, intentions, and meanings come together spatially. The physical and social interactions that shape a place and define its character and values can be understood through theories of place attachment. Educational environments, being key spaces for adolescent growth and development, are among the most important of these places. As these environments play a significant role in the lives of adolescents, who form emotional connections to them during their education, their design is especially important. Place attachment influences individuals’ behaviors, often driving them toward collective action aimed at improving the well-being of the community rather than personal gain, aligning with the spirit of community activism. Both tangible and intangible elements of a place evoke emotions in its users, fostering place attachment, strengthening social bonds, and encouraging protection of the space. Several theories on place attachment have been proposed, including Seamon’s place attachment theory. This research seeks to identify the components influencing place attachment in schools, specifically through the lens of Seamon’s attachment theory. The study aims to explore how Seamon’s “processes of place attachment (2012, 2014, 2015, 2018)” can enhance our understanding of place attachment in educational settings and inform school management practices.Methods: This research is a descriptive-analytical study. In order to achieve the research goals, the research began with an in-depth examination of Seamon’s place attachment theory through surveys and bibliographic review. Accordingly, key components influencing place attachment were identified and presented as a theoretical framework. These components were then prioritized and their relationships analyzed using confirmatory analysis. The statistical population comprised 7,404 7th-grade female students attending public schools in Municipal District 2 of Urmia during the 2022-2023 academic year, with a sample size of 365 determined by the Cochran formula. All students had been in these schools for at least three years. Simple random sampling was used to select the participants, and data was collected through a researcher-developed questionnaire.Findings: Results indicated that, among the endogenous variables of Seamon’s attachment theory—such as place interaction, place identity, place release, place realization, place creation, and place intensification—the factors most influencing students’ place attachment were place intensification, place realization, and place creation. These three components accounted for 5% of the changes in place attachment. Place intensification and place creation explained 18% of the variance in place realization, and place intensification explained 3% of the variance in place creation. Additionally, the indirect effect of place creation on place attachment was positive and significant at the 0.01 level, with a value of 0.06, mediated through the physical characteristics of the place. Therefore, the body of place plays a mediating role in the relationship between place intensification and place attachment. This effect is introduced through place realization; therefore, place realization played a mediating role between place intensification and place creation. The total effect of place intensification on the sense of place attachment is 0.15 positive and significant at the 0.01 level.Conclusion: This study provided deeper insights into place-based community groups and their motivations to either preserve or promote changes in place development and management. Each place requires a tailored approach to place management in order to effectively mobilize resources and partnerships. According to Seamon’s theory, place attachment is influenced by six main factors, divided into two categories: “Becoming of Place,” which includes place realization, place creation, and place intensification, and “Being of Place,” which includes place interaction, place identity, and place release. In this study, the effective factors in schools were identified, with place realization serving as a mediator between place intensification and place creation. Enhancing place intensification was found to boost place realization, which in turn enhanced place creation, ultimately improving place attachment. The indirect effect of place intensification on place realization was positive, with a value of 0.07, and significant at the 0.01 level.