اخبار ساختگی و اطلاعات گمراه کننده در چشم انداز صلح و امنیت بین المللی؛ با نگاهی بر منازعات قومی (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
اخبار ساختگی و اطلاعات گمراه کننده در عصر دیجیتالی شدن ارتباطات، پدیده ای است که پیچیدگی مفهومی و آثار متفاوت آن در ابعاد مختلف زندگی فردی و جمعی انسان ها، نیاز به واکاوی و بررسی های عمیق و دقیق دارد. این مقاله تلاش دارد تا با بررسی رویکردهای اخیر در سازوکارهای بین المللی به ویژه از سال 2015 به این سو، به بررسی این مهم بپردازد که چگونه و چرا اخبار ساختگی و اطلاعات گمراه کننده در حال تبدیل شدن به تهدیدی جدی و جهانی علیه صلح و امنیت بین المللی است. از این رو چشم انداز حاکم بر این مقاله توصیفی-تحلیلی است. هرچند سازمان ها و نهادهای بین المللی چه در سطح منطقه ای و چه در سطح جهانی در کنار نهادهای دولتی و داخلی کشورها و در سطوح مختلف، تلاش هایی ذیل عنوان «مبارزه با اخبار ساختگی و اطلاعات گمراه کننده» با هدف (ادعایی) حمایت از ساختارهای دموکراتیک و حقوق گروه های اقلیت، امنیت و ثبات در جامعه صورت داده اند، اما این تلاش ها با نقدهایی به ویژه بر محور آزادی بیان روبرو بوده است و منقدین بیم آن را داشته اند که در مسیر مبارزه با اخبار ساختگی و اطلاعات گمراه کننده، حقوق و آزادی های فردی و گروهی نقض شود.Fake News and Disinformation in the Perspective of International Peace and Security
Fake news and disinformation have emerged as significant challenges in the digital age, with profound implications for individual and societal well-being. This article aims to provide an extensive analysis of recent international legal mechanisms developed since 2015 to address the escalating threat posed by fake news and disinformation to international peace and security. Employing a descriptive-analytic approach, this study explores the reasons behind the proliferation of fake news and disinformation, and their multifaceted impacts, and draws upon several legal articles addressing this issue.Efforts to counter the spread of fake news and misinformation have gained traction among international organizations, regional and global institutions, national governments, and various stakeholders at different levels. These initiatives aim to uphold democratic structures, protect the rights of minority groups, and maintain security and stability in society. For instance, the United Nations (UN) has recognized the impact of disinformation on peace and security, emphasizing the importance of promoting information literacy, critical thinking, and responsible journalism to combat this issue (UN, 2020). The UN Security Council, in its Resolution 2317 (2016), acknowledged the potential role of fake news in exacerbating conflicts and destabilizing regions.However, such endeavors have not been without criticism, particularly concerning the potential infringement upon freedom of expression. Critics argue that measures taken to combat fake news and disinformation may inadvertently curtail the rights and freedoms of individuals and groups. Balancing the need to address the harmful effects of fake news while safeguarding freedom of expression remains a complex challenge for policymakers and legal experts alike. Legal scholars such as Fenwick (2019) highlight the necessity of finding the right balance between countering disinformation and protecting free speech, advocating for nuanced approaches that do not undermine democratic values.Moreover, research conducted in multi-ethnic countries reveals that fake news and disinformation can exacerbate ethnic tensions, leading to a new form of threat and discrimination against ethnic groups. False information can perpetuate existing conflicts and foster animosity between different communities. A study by Johnson et al. (2018) examined the role of disinformation in fueling ethnic conflicts in Southeast Asia, highlighting the need for comprehensive strategies to counter its divisive impact. Similarly, research by Di Gennaro and Dutton (2019) explored the impact of disinformation on ethnic polarization in Nigeria, emphasizing the role of social media platforms in amplifying divisive narratives.To effectively address the challenges posed by fake news and disinformation, international legal mechanisms should be carefully designed to target the dissemination of false information while upholding the fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals and groups. Collaborative efforts between international organizations, governments, civil society, and media institutions are crucial in developing and implementing strategies. The Council of Europe, for instance, has adopted a comprehensive approach, emphasizing media pluralism, transparency, and supporting fact-checking initiatives (Council of Europe, 2017). The European Union, through its Code of Practice on Disinformation, seeks to promote transparency, integrity, and accountability in online platforms (European Commission, 2018).Drawing upon the experiences and recommendations of legal scholars and researchers, several key strategies can be identified to address the issue of fake news and disinformation comprehensively. First, fostering media literacy and critical thinking skills is essential in enabling individuals to discern reliable information from falsehoods. Educational programs, awareness campaigns, and media literacy initiatives should be promoted to enhance the public's ability to critically evaluate news sources and content (Kaplan, 2019). The importance of media literacy is also recognized by organizations such as UNESCO, which emphasizes the need for comprehensive media and information literacy programs to counter disinformation (UNESCO, 2018)Second, promoting responsible journalism practices is vital to combating the spread of fake news and disinformation. Media organizations should uphold journalistic ethics, fact-checking protocols, and professional standards to ensure the dissemination of accurate and reliable information. Collaborative efforts between media institutions, fact-checking organizations, and technology platforms can contribute to the verification and debunking of false information (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2017). The role of media self-regulation in maintaining journalistic integrity and countering disinformation is highlighted in the research by Nielsen and Graves (2017), which emphasizes the importance of industry-wide initiatives to address this issue.Third, the regulation of social media platforms and technology companies is crucial in curbing the spread of fake news and disinformation. Transparent algorithms, improved content moderation, and cooperation with fact-checkers can help mitigate the dissemination of false information. Striking a balance between regulation and avoiding censorship is a challenge that requires careful consideration of the potential impact on freedom of expression (Citron & Norton, 2011). Legal scholars such as Gillespie (2018) argue for a comprehensive regulatory framework that ensures accountability, transparency, and user empowerment in the digital ecosystem.Furthermore, international cooperation and coordination are essential to effectively address the transnational nature of fake news and disinformation. Cross-border collaboration between governments, international organizations, and technology companies can facilitate the sharing of best practices, information, and resources in combating this global challenge. The Global Disinformation Index, for example, serves as a collaborative effort to provide tools and data to mitigate the spread of disinformation (Global Disinformation Index, n.d.).In conclusion, the rise of fake news and disinformation poses a grave global threat to international peace and security. Countermeasures against this phenomenon have encountered both support and opposition, with the need to balance the preservation of freedom of expression and the mitigation of harmful effects. Efforts to combat fake news and disinformation should encompass a multi-faceted approach that includes media literacy, responsible journalism practices, regulation of technology platforms, and international cooperation. By implementing comprehensive legal mechanisms and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, societies can effectively confront the challenges posed by fake news and disinformation while upholding the principles of freedom of expression and preserving peace and security.