آینده پژوهی سازماندهی دانش: شناسایی نیروهای پیشران، چالش ها، راهکارها و خلأها (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
مقدمه: هدف، آینده پژوهی سازماندهی دانش با استفاده از نظرات متخصصین ایرانی این حوزه درباره آینده و مسائل مرتبط با آن هست. روش شناسی: نوع پژوهش کاربردی با رویکرد کیفی است که با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی، گراندد تئوری و ابزار مصاحبه گردآوری شده است. روش نمونه گیری هدفمند است. جامعه پژوهش نیز 20 نفر از متخصصین علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی با زمینه تخصصی سازماندهی دانش هستند که با آن ها مصاحبه شد. یافته ها: به نظر متخصصین، نیروهای پیشران تأثیرگذار در آینده سازماندهی دانش عبارت اند از: تولیدکنندگان دانش، دست اندرکاران دانش، کاربران دانش و برخی مصاحبه شوندگان مجموعه پژوهش های سازماندهی دانش را روند روبه رشد و در عین حال متنوعی می دانند. فهرست نویسی و رده بندی، تاکسونومی، مباحث سنتی از جمله موارد کاهشی و ابزارهای تحت وب، ابزارها و استانداردهای سازماندهی دانش، وب معنایی و هستی شناسی از جمله موارد افزایشی بیان شده است. در زمینه چالش های سازماندهی دانش نیز می توان به عواملی مانند مشکلات پژوهشی، نیروی انسانی، آموزش و ...، اشاره کرد. نتیجه گیری: سازماندهی دانش موضوعی چندوجهی، روبه رشد و دارای زایش در علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی است که با مسائل و موارد قوت و ضعف خود دست به گریبان است. هر کدام از بخش های مدل پارادایمی با یکدیگر در تعامل بوده و بر یکدیگر اثر مثبت یا منفی می گذارند. صاحب نظران سازماندهی دانش شناخت خوب و روشنی از مسائل این حوزه دارند و موارد تأثیرگذار مختلفی را بیان کرده اند. بنابراین لازم است با بهره گیری از خرد جمعی و حمایت های مالی و معنوی اهمیت بیشتری به سازماندهی دانش داد و در ارتقای نقاط قوت و رفع نقاط ضعف کوشید.Future Study of Knowledge Organization: Identify Driving Forces, Challenges, Solutions and Gaps
Introduction: Knowledge organization is one of the oldest and most fundamental topics in knowledge and information science. Future study is a general human capacity that enables a person to think about the future and examine, model and create future possibilities and show them in front of themselves. Success in identifying driving forces, macrotrends and shapers of the future and investigating their impact on key factors affecting each future and analyzing the feasibility of certain futures with the aim of creating desirable futures are among the goals of future research. The future of information science has faced new developments. Undoubtedly, the future will be different from what has been customary before. The profession of information science must make fundamental and specific changes, otherwise it will be abandoned. Futuristic science is a science that opens the view of information science to possible future events, challenges and opportunities and makes it possible to reach the desired future from the right path. It seems that there is no clear, accurate and correct view of the developments, effective forces, challenges, solutions and matters related to the knowledge organization. Not having the right knowledge and making decisions based on trial and error and different tastes, causes waste of time and money, getting lost, reducing efficiency, rework, lack of coherence, getting lost, etc., and causes a lot of losses to this important field. The purpose of this research is to future study of knowledge organization using the opinions of Iranian experts in this field about the future and related issues. Methodology: The type of research is applied with a qualitative approach that has been collected by qualitative content analysis, grounded theory and interview tools to obtain the opinions of knowledge organization experts. The collected data were analyzed based on thematic analysis. After asking questions, the interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner and implemented. The transcripts of the interviews were then read and reviewed several times so that the researcher had sufficient control over the data. In the third stage, the data were broken down into semantic units in the form of sentences and paragraphs related to the main meaning. Semantic units were reviewed several times and then the appropriate concepts of each semantic unit were written. The research population is 20 experts in information science and science with a specialized field of knowledge organization who were interviewed by phone. Findings: The results led to the identification of several factors about the driving forces, trends, challenges and strategies affecting knowledge organization. According to experts, the influential driving forces in the future of knowledge organization are: knowledge producers, knowledge stakeholders, knowledge users, knowledge theorists, education, cooperation of information science and computer science experts, etc. Some interviewees see the collection of research on knowledge organization as a growing yet diverse trend. Cataloging and classification, taxonomy, traditional topics including reduction items and web-based tools, tools and standards for organizing knowledge, semantic web and ontology are expressed as incremental items. In the field of knowledge organizing challenges, we can also mention factors such as: research problems, manpower, education, data problems, software problems, non-compliance with standards. The interviewees also provided a variety of solutions in the fields of education, research, manpower, financial resources and technology-related issues. Finally, the paradigm model of the research was drawn and the related factors in each category were identified. Conclusion: Organizing knowledge is a multifaceted, growing and prolific subject in knowledge and information science that is struggling with its strengths and weaknesses. Each part of the paradigm model interacts with each other and has a positive or negative effect on each other. Paying attention to the positive points and eliminating the weak points can help in promoting the knowledge organization and knowledge and information science. Education is one of the most important driving forces of knowledge organization and is like a double-edged sword that can act as an effective force if paid attention to. Otherwise it is considered a big challenge. Experts in knowledge organization have a good and clear knowledge of the issues in this area and have expressed various influential cases. Therefore, it is necessary to use collective wisdom and financial and spiritual support to pay more attention to knowledge organizing and try to promote strengths and eliminate weaknesses.
تبلیغات
