آرشیو

آرشیو شماره ها:
۲۳

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی هسته کلیدی بخش زیربنایی استان آذربایجان شرقی، با رویکرد تحلیل چندبخشی (MSA) است. با توجه به ماهیت پژوهش حاضر، روش پژوهش مبتنی بر رویکرد تحلیل چندبخشی است و از تکنیک هایی مانند مدل تحلیلی SWOT جهت تحلیل یافته ها بهره گرفته شده است و در پایان راهبرد های ارائه شده با استفاده از روش ماتریس برنامه ریزی استراتژیک کمی (QSPM) اولویت بندی شده اند. این پژوهش در گام نخست به استخراج فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات به عنوان کلیدی ترین زیربخش بخش زیربنایی استان با بکاربست مدل تحلیلی MSA و نرم افزار اکسل پرداخته و بااهمیت ترین معیارها را در این بخش استخراج می کند. نتایج یافته ها بیانگر این است که در سطح زیربخش ها فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات به عنوان هسته کلیدی با 72/0 امتیاز و در سطح معیار ها، ایجاد ارزش افزوده بالا، ارتقاء توان تولید (فرآیند، تجهیزات و فناوری) و جذب سرمایه خارجی به ترتیب بیشترین اهمیت را دارند. از سویی فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات به عنوان تأثیرپذیرترین و تأثیر گذار ترین زیربخش نیز شناخته شده است. در گام بعدی این مطالعه با روش SWOT به بررسی نقاط قوت و ضعف، فرصت ها و تهدید های هسته کلیدی استخراج شده از تحلیل MSA و با استفاده از روش ماتریس برنامه ریزی استراتژیک کمی (QSPM) به اولویت بندی راهبرد های ارائه شده پرداخته شد. یافته های تحقیق نشان می دهد فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در استان آذربایجان شرقی جایگاه مناسب خود را نیافته و اگر استان بخواهد در این بخش پیشرفت کند باید استراتژی های گروه تدافعی (WT) را که مبتنی بر کاهش نقاط ضعف و پرهیز از تهدید هاست، در اولویت قرار دهد که طبق نتایج، استراتژی فراهم سازی بستر مناسب کسب وکارهای الکترونیک و ایجاد واحد استانی توانمند سازی کسب وکارهای اینترنتی جهت افزایش امنیت اطلاعات و توانمند سازی متخصصان فاوا و صاحبان ایده های کسب وکار در استان آذربایجان شرقی توصیه می شود.

Identifying Information and Communication Technology as a Key Factor in the Development of the Infrastructure Sector of East Azerbaijan Province: A Multisectoral Analysis (MSA) Approach

Extended abstract 1-INTRODUCTION Economic theories and experiences of different countries show that there are different paths for economic growth and development, and the rate of growth and development depends on what sectors of the economy to invest in. the growth rate also varies according to the sectors in which it is invested. for this reason, the production system is usually divided into two parts: production and consumer goods, and it is often said that the productive goods sector is the driving force of growth. therefore, in the long run, maximizing growth depends on allocating as much investment as possible to key sectors of the economy. 2-THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK In general, growth and development theories are classified into three main groups in order to identify the importance of economic sectors and how resources are allocated: balanced growth theory, unbalanced growth theory and growth pole theory. Rosenstein-Roden (1943), the founder of the theory of balanced growth, argues that one sector alone cannot provide economic development, but if several sectors start producing with increasing and related returns, so that each demand for the product provide another, economic development will be possible. due to the skepticism of the theory of balanced growth, the theory of unbalanced growth was proposed in the economic literature by Hirschman (1958).  according to this theory, investment should be made in sectors so that the benefits of this investment penetrate into other economic sectors and investment conditions are provided in these sectors. in this theory, Hirschman (1958) believes that in order to achieve development, we have to choose one or more projects from different investment plans, according to our possibilities. other categories of theories for providing a path to development are known as growth pole theories. other categories of theories for providing a path to development are known as growth pole theories, first proposed by Peru (1968) in the economic literature. Peru’s innovative concept is actually derived from Schumpeter’s idea that growth is a direct and indirect product of innovation. in Peru’s theory, simultaneous growth does not occur everywhere, but at points or poles of development that have high gravity. these points spread development through channels and affect the entire economy. 3- METHODOLOGY The aim of this study is to identify the key core of the infrastructure sector of East Azerbaijan province with the multi-sector analysis (MSA) approach. In the first step, this research extracts information and communication technology as the key subdivision of the infrastructure sector of the province using MSA analytical model and Excel software and extracts the most important criteria in this sector. In the next step of this study, the SWOT method examined the strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the key core extracted from the MSA analysis, and using the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM) method, the proposed strategies were prioritized. 4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION The results indicate that at the level of subsectors, ICT as a key core with 0.72 points and at the level of criteria, creating high added value, improving production capacity (process, equipment and technology) and absorption. Foreign capital is the most important, respectively. On the other hand, information and communication technology is also known as the most influential and influential sub-sector. Research findings show that information and communication technology has not found its proper place in East Azerbaijan province. 5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS Findings show that information and communication technology in East Azerbaijan province has not found its proper place and if the province wants to progress in this area, the strategies of the Defensive Group (WT), which is based on reducing weaknesses and avoiding threats, should be given priority. According to the results, the strategy of providing a suitable platform for e-businesses and creating a provincial unit for empowering Internet businesses to increase information security and empower ICT professionals and business idea owners in East Azerbaijan Province is recommended.

تبلیغات