بررسی گسترش معنا و بافت کاربردی واژه ها و اصطلاح ها به/ از حوزه خودرو در گونه گفتاری زبان فارسی (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
واژه ها و اصطلاح های بسیاری درباره حوزه خودرو دستخوش انواع گسترش معنا یا گسترش بافت کاربردی شده اند. پیکره زبانی این پژوهش مجموعه واژه ها و اصطلاح هایی است که با تغییر معنا یا گسترش بافت کاربردی به حوزه خودرو راه یافته یا از حوزه خودرو به گنجینه واژگان زبان فارسی افزوده شده است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش توصیفی- تحلیلی ارائه و تعریف این واژه هاست. سپس به چگونگی رخداد این تغییرها و گسترش ها با بهره گیری از نظریه «ربط» اسپربر و ویلسون پرداخته شده است. طبق نتایج گویشوران زبان فارسی با توجه به دانش ها، تجربه ها و اطلاعات زمینه ای مشترکشان هم معنای اولیه این دست واژه ها و اصطلاح ها را می دانند، هم به معانی و کاربرد گسترش یافته آنها دسترسی دارند. مطابق نظریه «ربط» هنگامی که شنونده واژه یا اصطلاحی درباره حوزه خودرو دریافت می کند، با در نظر گرفتن بافت موقعیت، آن را با اطلاعات زمینه ای خود می سنجد و تطبیق می دهد و سرانجام درک می کند منظور گوینده معنی اولیه آن واژه و اصطلاح، یا معنی گسترش یافته آن است. دلیل این بده بستان واژه ها و اصطلاح ها جدایی ناپذیری حوزه ترابری از زندگی انسان و بهره بردن از ویژگی های خودرو در توصیف برخی از ویژگی های بدن و رفتار انسان است.Extension of The Meaning and Physical Context of Vehicle Terms to Everyday Persian Vocabulary And Vice versa
Many Persian terms and expressions realated to vehicles have undergone extension of the meaning and physical context. The corpus under study includes vehicle terms that have entered Persian vocabulary as well as common words and expressions that have been added to vehicle terms through extension of the meaning and physical context. Identifying whether a word or an expression has undergone extension of meaning and physical context is based on the linguistic intuition of the author as a native speaker of Persian. This research presents several examples and discusses them within the framework of Relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986). In line with this theory, there exists a combination of knowledge, experiences and shared background information about vehicle-realated terms in the mind of every Persian speaker. Using this combination, not only Persian speakers are aware of their original meanings and physical contexts but also they have access to their extended meanings and/ or physical contexts. In accordance with the Relevance theory, when a Persian speaker hears a vehicle-realated term, s/he considers the physical context to evaluate it and then matches it with her/his background knowledge in order to figure out if the speaker intended its original meaning or its extended meaning.Extended abstract 1.IntroductionTransportation is an effective and inseperable part of human life. It has always been the reason for creating many words, idioms and proverbs in Persian. Its effect has been so great that vehicles and their features have been used to describe some of the features of human body and behavior. There are also some common Persian words and expressions that have been added to vehicle terms through extension of the meaning and physical context. The present study aimed to address the following research questions:Which common Persian words and expressions have been added to vehicle terms through the extension of the meaning and physical context?Which vehicle-realated terms have been added to the Persian vocabulary through the extension of the meaning and physical context?What are the reasons of this word and expression exchange? 2.Theoretical frameworkThe theoretical framework of this paper is the Relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986). In fact this theory is the extended modle of Grice’s maxim of relation as one of the cooperative principles. According to Luchjenbroers (1989: 1), Grice’s theory is speaker-oriented while Sperber & Wilson’s theory is listener-oriented. According to the relevance theory, relevance means that the listener expects the speaker to do their best to create a message which is as relevent as possible. And the listener receives and interprets the message with the same expection. The more contextual information in the message, the more relevent it is; and the existance of more relevent message requires less mental effort by the listener. Sperber & Wilson (1986) argue that human is evolved to look for the most relevent information. In accordance with this theory, there exists a combination of knowledge, experiences and shared background information in the mind of every speaker. When the listener hears the speaker’s message, s/he considers the physical context to evaluate it and then matches it with her/his background knowledge in order to figure out its meaning.3.MethodologyThis research primarily aimed at addressing the extension of the meaning and physical context of vehicle terms to common Persian vocabulary and vice versa. Then, it discussed these words and expressions within the framework of Relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1986). They were collected using dictionaries, internet search, car classified ads, the experieces of the present reseacher in dealing with mechanics, drivers, and petrolheads as well as his own vocabulary knowledge. Identifying whether a word or an expression has undergone extension of meaning and physical context is based on the linguistic intuition of the author as a native speaker of Persian. The corpus under study includes vehicle terms that have entered Persian vocabulary as well as common words and expressions that have been added to vehicle terms through extension of the meaning and physical context.4.Results & DiscussionIn response to the first and second research questions, it should be stated that almost all the Persian words and expressions that have been added to vehicle terms through extension of the meaning and physical context and those vehicle-realated terms that have been added likewise to the Persian vocabulary were introduced. In response to the third research question “What is the reason of this word and expression exchange?”, it should be stated that the analysis of these exchanges indicated that different semantic changes, extension of the physical context, and metaphorical extention occur due to the similarity between the function and behavior of vehicles and humans as well as the similarity between the appearance of some vehicle parts and the features of human body and life style. The possessor-possessee relation as a type of metonymy is one reason for the extension of vehicle-realated terms to the Persian vocabulary, while metaphorical extention is a reason for the addition of Persian vocabulary to vehicle terms. 5.Conclusions & SuggestionsUsing their shared background knowledge about vehicle-realated terms, Persian speakers not only are aware of their original meanings and physical contexts but also they have access to their extended meanings and/ or physical contexts. According to the Relevance theory, when a Persian speaker hears a vehicle-realated term, s/he considers the physical context to evaluate it and then matches it with her/his background knowledge in order to figure out if the speaker intended its original meaning or its extended meaning.Select BibliographyEvans, V. How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford University Press. 2009.Galiñanes, C. L. Relevance theory, Humor and the narrative structure of humorous novels. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses. Vol.13. 2000.Grice, H. P. ‘Logic and conversation’, William James Lectures, Harvard.1967. Published in Grice 1989, 1–143.Grice, H.P. "Further Notes on Logic and Conversation," Syntax and Semantics, 1978. vol.9 edited by P. Cole, Academic Press. Reprinted as ch.3 of Grice 1989, 41–57.Hurford, J. R. & Heaslry, B. Semantics: A Coursebook. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996.Jam, B. Extension of the Meaning and Physical Context of Religious words and Expressions in Spoken Persian: A Relevance-Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Linguistics & Khorasan Dialects Biannual, 2022; 4(24): 81. pp. 55-81. [In Persian].Luchjenbroers, J. Relevance Theory and Context Selection. La Trobe Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 2). 1989.Safavi, K. Which meaning? Journal of Linguage Science. 2013; 1(1): 11-40. [In Persian].Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition with a new postface, 1995. Stalnaker, R. Pragmatics. Synthese. 1970: 22: 272–289.
تبلیغات
