علیرضا جلیلی فر

علیرضا جلیلی فر

مطالب
ترتیب بر اساس: جدیدترینپربازدید‌ترین

فیلتر های جستجو: فیلتری انتخاب نشده است.
نمایش ۴۱ تا ۴۲ مورد از کل ۴۲ مورد.
۴۱.

Exploring retrospective/prospective patterns in MICUSP: A comparative study of English as a first language and English as an additional language(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
منبع: پژوهش های زبان شناسی سال ۱۵ پاییز و زمستان ۱۴۰۲ شماره ۲ (پیاپی ۲۹) 77 - 92

کلید واژه ها: academic writing Metadiscourse Prospective Categories Retrospective Categories MICUSP Genre

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۲۸ تعداد دانلود : ۳۹
English as a First Language (EFL) and English as an Additional Language (The results indicated that both EFL and EAL students used a diverse array of linguistic features to express their ideas in academic prose, with the prospective categories being the most commonly used.
۴۲.

Examining Classroom Observation Forms in the Iranian Context: A Rhetorical Analysis of Academic Commentary in Teacher Evaluation(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
منبع: Applied Research on English Language, V. ۱۲ , N. ۴ , ۲۰۲۳ 103 - 130

کلید واژه ها: Supervisory discourse Rhetorical analysis Academic commentary Class observation Teacher evaluation

حوزه های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۱۴ تعداد دانلود : ۱۲
Delivering supervisory feedback to teachers is considered a challenge in teacher education and evaluation. This study analyzed the rhetorical features and effectiveness of the academic commentary that observers write at the end of observation forms. The study aimed to explore the qualitative section of an observation form that is filled out by observers during classroom observation and obtain an understanding of macro and micro features, and how they are perceived by observers and observees through a questionnaire. For this purpose and on account of the Swalesian approach (2004), we gleaned 200 commentaries written by different observers across the country, examined the recurring rhetorical patterns of structure, and subsequently developed a questionnaire to elicit the effectiveness of these features in academic commentaries. The result revealed that as a review genre the extracted framework enjoyed a rhetorical structure generically representative of a common practice in characterizing academic commentary in the Iranian context, and in terms of effectiveness, although there were discrepancies, the majority of observers and observees were found to have shared concepts of how to establish rapport, present evaluation, and finalize the academic commentary.  

کلیدواژه‌های مرتبط

پدیدآورندگان همکار

تبلیغات

پالایش نتایج جستجو

تعداد نتایج در یک صفحه:

درجه علمی

مجله

سال

حوزه تخصصی

زبان