مدل شناسی تطبیقی پاسخ به بیوتروریسم کشاورزی (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
بروز هرگونه آسیب در صنعت کشاورزی موجب ناامنی ملی و غذایی می شود. در این عصر مقابله با بیوتروریسم کشاورزی جز در سایه تعامل، دوراندیشی و سازمان دهی مناسب کشورهاامکان پذیر نخواهد بود. با بهره مندی از دیپلماسی پاسخ گذاری می توان به بررسی و ارائه یک مدل جهت پاسخ دهی به بیوتروریسم کشاورزی از طریق انعقاد قراردادهای دو یا چندجانبه و معاهدات پرداخت. مقاله حاضر به دنبال پاسخ به این پرسش اساسی است که آیا جمهوری اسلامی ایران همانند کشورهای پیشرو دارای مدل پاسخگویی خاصی جهت مقابله با بیوتروریسم کشاورزی است؟ در پاسخ به این پرسش باید به این نکته اذعان کرد که در سیاست جنایی ایران تاکنون مدل و چارچوبی برای مدیریت خطر به جهت جلوگیری و یا کاهش بیوتروریسم کشاورزی و یا ارائه واکنش های اضطراری به آن تدوین نشده است. این در حالی است که کشورهایی مانند آمریکا، انگلستان و استرالیا سال هاست که پی به اهمیت این موضوع برده و بعضاً ملاحظات این پدیده مجرمانه را در ساختار کلی امنیت ملی خود گنجانده اند. تحقیق حاضر از نظر نوع و هدف، کاربردی و از نظر ماهیت و روش، توصیفی بوده که با جمع آوری اطلاعات از طریق بررسی اسنادی و فیش برداری و رجوع به سایت ها و مقالات متعدد به رشته تحریر درآمده است.Comparative Modeling of Responses to Agricultural Bioterrorism: A Legal Analysis
The occurrence of any damage within the agricultural industry can have severe ramifications for national and food security. Addressing this insecurity necessitates international cooperation, foresight, and effective organization among countries. This article explores the potential of employing diplomatic strategies to establish response models for agricultural bioterrorism through bilateral or multilateral agreements and treaties. The central question addressed in this study is whether the Islamic Republic of Iran possesses a specific response model for addressing agricultural bioterrorism, akin to other nations. The examination reveals that Iran lacks a comprehensive risk management model within its criminal policy to prevent or mitigate agricultural bioterrorism and provide timely emergency responses. In contrast, countries like the United States, England, and Australia have recognized the significance of this threat for years, incorporating it into their national security frameworks. This descriptive study draws upon extensive document reviews, referencing numerous sources and articles. The dynamic global landscape, characterized by political, economic, and social transformations, underscores the critical importance of agriculture, which serves as a vital source of employment, self-sufficiency, and food security for nations. Consequently, one of the most economically impactful strategies that can be employed by malicious actors is targeting a country's agricultural and food supply. Terrorism, as a subject of criminal law and policy, encompasses various forms, with bioterrorism being particularly significant, as it encompasses a wide array of potential threats. An intentional biological attack on the agricultural sector can lead to extensive consequences, giving rise to the phenomenon known as agricultural bioterrorism or agroterrorism. Agricultural bioterrorism involves the deliberate release of pathogenic agents affecting animals or plants with the intent to instill fear, inflict economic damage, and disrupt a nation's stability. The discussion surrounding agricultural bioterrorism is multifaceted and fundamental, posing risks to agricultural products, livestock populations, and human health. Furthermore, it poses a threat to ecosystems and can facilitate the introduction of pests through contaminated seeds, infected livestock, novel fertilizers altering soil structure, tainted meat imports, and biodiversity concerns. In the context of threats to the agricultural industry, the emergence of "bio-agricultural warfare" or "bio-terrorism" as a contemporary phenomenon is not inconceivable.The threats associated with agricultural bioterrorism primarily stem from three factors: a lack of awareness among citizens and agriculture professionals, weak legal frameworks, and inadequate infrastructure to combat agricultural bioterrorism. In recent decades, these threats have undergone significant and complex developments on both domestic and international fronts due to factors such as the ease of transferring and storing biological agents, their ability to reproduce, the difficulty of attributing attacks to specific perpetrators, and the involvement of organized criminal groups. The economic and national security repercussions of an agricultural bioterrorism attack far surpass those of a conventional war, making it a pressing concern in the contemporary global landscape. The globalization of terrorism has allowed perpetrators to operate across international borders without restraint, making no region, government, or nation immune to their actions. Consequently, addressing the multifaceted challenges and threats posed by agricultural bioterrorism demands international cooperation among governments and international organizations.Models serve as valuable tools for navigating the complexity of the criminal process, similar to how natural science models offer coherent plans for experimentation. Within the criminal justice context, models simplify details while highlighting common themes and trends. A comprehensive criminal justice system can incorporate multiple models rather than adhering to a single, isolated model. In light of the interconnectedness of legal systems, it is imperative for contemporary legal systems to draw from the successes of others. Therefore, embracing various models and adopting an optimal criminal policy, in collaboration between government and social systems, offers a promising avenue for preventing and mitigating threats associated with agricultural bioterrorism, both domestically and internationally. This study underscores the importance of localized international regulations, swift and accurate methods for identifying dangerous biological agents, education initiatives, and the enactment of necessary legislation to address agricultural bioterrorism effectively.
تبلیغات
