ترجیحات سکونتی طبقه خلاق شهر رشت و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)
درجه علمی: نشریه علمی (وزارت علوم)
آرشیو
چکیده
در نظریه های شهری جدید، آنچه باعث توسعه اقتصادی یک منطقه می شود، وجود نیروهای انسانی خلاق در آن منطقه است و نقش عوامل سنتی همچون موقعیت جغرافیایی، دسترسی و... کم رنگ شده است؛ چرا که قدرت حضور طبقه خلاق در یک شهر خود می تواند سایر عوامل رشد اقتصادی را تحت الشعاع قرار دهد. بنابراین توجه به ویژگی های سکونتی طبقه خلاق و ترجیحاتی که آنان برای سکونت در موقعیت مکانی مشخصی از شهرها دارند، از موضوعات مهم در توسعه شهرها است. پژوهش حاضر، عوامل مؤثر بر ترجیحات سکونتی طبقه خلاق شهر رشت را ارزیابی کرده است. هدف اصلی این تحقیق بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر ترجیحات سکونتی طبقه خلاق شهر رشت بوده است. در این پژوهش، داده ها به صورت اسنادی و پیمایشی گردآوری شده است. تعداد 384 پرسشنامه در بین اعضای طبقه خلاق در شهر رشت تکمیل شده و داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار Spss و آزمون های آماری فریدمن، علامت و ویلکاکسون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفته است. بر اساس یافته های تحقیق، در ترجیحات سکونتی طبقه خلاق شهر رشت، عوامل کلاسیک سهم بسزایی داشته اند و تأثیر عوامل نرم کمتر از عوامل کلاسیک بوده است. همچنین یافته های تحقیق نشان داده است میزان تمایل و ترجیح سکونت طبقه خلاق در لایه های داخلی شهر، بالاست و هرچه از لایه های اولیه شهر به سمت پیرامون حرکت می کنیم، از تمرکز ترجیح سکونتی طبقه خلاق کاسته شده است. با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش، محله هایی که افراد طبقه خلاق شهر رشت ترجیح می دهند در آنجا زندگی کنند، عبارت بوده است از: منظریه، گلسار و بلوار گیلان، معلم، بازار، کاکتوس، ضیابری، فلسطین، نیکمرام، پارک شهر.Residential Preferences of the Creative Class of Rasht and the Factors Influencing It
In new urban theories, what causes the economic development of a region is the presence of creative human forces in that region. Meanwhile, traditional factors such as geographical location, access, etc., are dimmed because the creative class's presence in a city can overshadow other factors of economic growth. Therefore, paying attention to the residential characteristics of the creative class and their preferences for living in a specific location in cities is one of the important issues in the urban development. The study has evaluated the factors influencing the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city. The main purpose of this research was to investigate the factors influencing the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city. It was a descriptive-analytical study. Data was collected through documentary and field studies. 384 questionnaires were distributed among the creative class members in Rasht city. The data were analyzed using Friedman, Sign, and Wilcoxon tests. Findings showed that classic factors significantly contributed to the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city, and the influence of soft factors was less than the classic factors. Also, the findings of the research have shown that the desire and preference of the creative class to live in the inner layers of the city is high, and as we move from the initial layers of the city to the periphery, the concentration of the residential preference of the creative class has decreased. According to the results, the neighborhoods where people of the creative class of Rasht city prefer to live included Manzariyeh, Golsār and Giulān Boulevard, Moalem, Bazaar, Cāctous, Ziābri, Felestin, Nikmarām, and Park Shahr. Extended Introduction In new urban theories, what causes the economic development of a region is the presence of creative human forces in that region. Meanwhile, traditional factors such as geographical location, access, etc., are dimmed because the creative class's presence in a city can overshadow other factors of economic growth. Therefore, paying attention to the residential characteristics of the creative class and their preferences for living in a specific location in cities is one of the important issues in the development of cities. This study has evaluated the factors influencing the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city. The basic purpose of this research is to identify the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht according to the classical and soft factors. This article seeks to answer the following questions: What factors influence the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city? Are the classical factors more important than soft factors? Does moving away from the city center decrease the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city? Is there any difference between the residential preferences of the creative class and their current residence in Rasht city? Methodology It was a descriptive-analytical study. In terms of duration, it was cross-sectional research Data was collected through documentary and field studies. The hypotheses of this research have been analyzed and tested using SPSS software. After some modifications and alterations, the validity of the researcher-made questionnaire has been confirmed by the professors of urban affairs. Cronbach's Alpha was computed to assess the questionnaire reliability (α = 0.706), indicating the questionnaire's appropriate and high reliability. 384 questionnaires have been distributed among the creative class members in Rasht, and the data have been analyzed using SPSS software and Friedman, Sign, and Wilcoxon's statistical tests. The research variables were extracted using documentary studies, which included 2 dimensions of classical and soft criteria, 16 sub-criteria, and 59 items. Soft criteria included: factors related to leisure, cultural facilities, neighborhoods with outstanding artistic features in which people feel very comfortable, having many restaurants and cafes, and having the characteristics of freedom and the capacity to accept cultural diversity. Classical criteria also included demographic and economic factors that effectively choose the location of normal employees. Results and discussion Friedman's test was used to measure the effect of soft and classical factors on the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht City. There is a difference in the residential preference of the creative class of Rasht city referring to the value of the Chi-Square test (38.76, P>0.05). According to the mean rank of the two general categories of classical factors (1.66) and soft factors (1.34), the effect of classical factors on residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city is more than soft factors. The most important factors in the residential preferences of the creative class included the characteristics of the residence, busy streets full of facilities, environmental issues, life cycle, security, tolerance and diversity, locality and health. Also, these factors have the least importance in the residential preferences of the creative class: Ethnic-linguistic factors, Cost of Living, Historical factors, Income, Marginalization, Educational-artistic spaces, Workplace access and Recreational spaces. The value of the Z test and the significance level (S=0.000) indicated the significance of the apparent difference in the selection of residential preferences of the creative class. Also, in addition to the significance of the difference between the residential preferences of the creative class and their current residential environment, we can get a better view of the residential preference situation of the creative class by specifying the difference. Therefore, the number of those whose current residence is equal to their residential preferences is around 122 cases or 31.77% of the statistical sample. Therefore, about a third of the creative class people live exactly in residential environments that are equal to their preferences and desires. The total number of people whose residential preference is different from their desired place of residence is about 262 people, or 68.23% of our full statistical sample. In other words, the current living environment of more than two-thirds of the people of the creative class of Rasht differs from their preferences and desires. Florida's creative class theory considers soft factors' influence on creative people's residential preference to be more effective than classical factors and insists on reducing the influence of classical factors in its theories. However, the results indicated that the influence of classical factors on the selection and preference of the residential environment for creative people is more effective. Also, it should be acknowledged that soft factors are not entirely unaffected, and they are also effective in the residential preferences of the creative class of Rasht city. Yet, the extent of this effect is less than the effect of classical factors. Furthermore, the results differ from those in America and are in line with some European studies. Therefore, the current article violates the assumption that all people who introduced as the creative class necessarily choose their residential preferences based on a number of specific factors (soft factors); but their residential preferences are based on a combination of classical and soft factors. Conclusion The research findings show that the level of desire and preference of the creative class in the inner layers of the city is high, and as we move from the initial layers of the city to the surrounding area, the concentration of the residential preference of the creative class is reduced. According to the results of this study, the neighborhoods where creative people prefer to live in Rasht have been: Manzarieh (25%), Golsār and Guilān Blvd (21%), Moalem (15%), Bazaar (14%), Cactous (10%), Ziābari (8%), Felestin (3%), Nikmarām (2%), Pārk Shahr (1%). Funding There is no funding support. Authors’ Contribution Authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of the article. All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work Conflict of Interest Authors declared no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments We are grateful to all the persons for scientific consulting in this paper.
تبلیغات
