مطالب مرتبط با کلیدواژه

Kantian ethics


۱.

Has Richard Rorty a moral philosophy?(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
منبع: پژوهش های فلسفی پاییز و زمستان ۱۳۹۴ شماره ۱۷

کلیدواژه‌ها: moral philosophy solidarity moral progress Kantian ethics Rorty

حوزه‌های تخصصی:
  1. حوزه‌های تخصصی فلسفه و منطق فلسفه غرب رویکرد موضوعی فلسفه های مضاف فلسفه دین
  2. حوزه‌های تخصصی فلسفه و منطق فلسفه غرب رویکرد موضوعی فلسفه های مضاف فلسفه اخلاق
تعداد بازدید : ۸۲۳ تعداد دانلود : ۳۶۶
I try to show that Richard Rorty, although is not a moral philosopher like Kant, nerveless, has moral philosophy that must be taken seriously. Rorty was not engaged with moral philosophy in the systematic manner common among leading modern and contemporary moral philosophers. This paper has two parts: first part, in brief, is concerned with principles of his philosophy such as anti-essentialism, Darwinism, Freudism, and historicism. Second part which be long and detailed, considers many moral themes in Rorty's thought such as critique of Kantian morality, solidarity, moral progress, cruelty and concept of other, etc. Subsequently, I will try to answer the research question of the article namely, has Rorty a moral philosophy?
۲.

On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai(مقاله علمی وزارت علوم)

نویسنده:
منبع: پژوهش های فلسفی پاییز ۱۳۹۸ شماره ۲۸ 75-93

کلیدواژه‌ها: dignitarianism Statism identitarianism Kantian ethics Martin Luther King civil disobedience Samurai ethics

حوزه‌های تخصصی:
تعداد بازدید : ۳۵۴ تعداد دانلود : ۲۵۱
On the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly Kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of Statism, e.g., neoliberal nation-States, whether democratic or non-democratic—hence fundamentally non-coercive and non-violent, then is self-defense or the defense of innocent others, using force, ever rationally justifiable and morally permissible or obligatory? We think that the answer to this hard question is yes; correspondingly, in this essay we develop and defend a theory about the permissible use of force in a broadly Kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, including its extension to non-violent civil disobedience in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Jr; and perhaps surprisingly, we also import several key insights from Samurai and Martial Arts ethics into our theory.